The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: After the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved computer-aided detection (CAD) for mammography in 1998, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) provided increased payment in 2002, CAD technology disseminated rapidly. Despite sparse evidence that CAD improves accuracy of mammographic interpretations and costs over $400 million a year, CAD is currently used for most screening mammograms in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To measure performance of digital screening mammography with and without CAD in US community practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We compared the accuracy of digital screening mammography interpreted with (n = 495 818) vs without (n = 129 807) CAD from 2003 through 2009 in 323 973 women. Mammograms were interpreted by 271 radiologists from 66 facilities in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Linkage with tumor registries identified 3159 breast cancers in 323 973 women within 1 year of the screening. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mammography performance (sensitivity, specificity, and screen-detected and interval cancers per 1000 women) was modeled using logistic regression with radiologist-specific random effects to account for correlation among examinations interpreted by the same radiologist, adjusting for patient age, race/ethnicity, time since prior mammogram, examination year, and registry. Conditional logistic regression was used to compare performance among 107 radiologists who interpreted mammograms both with and without CAD. RESULTS: Screening performance was not improved with CAD on any metric assessed. Mammography sensitivity was 85.3% (95% CI, 83.6%-86.9%) with and 87.3% (95% CI, 84.5%-89.7%) without CAD. Specificity was 91.6% (95% CI, 91.0%-92.2%) with and 91.4% (95% CI, 90.6%-92.0%) without CAD. There was no difference in cancer detection rate (4.1 in 1000 women screened with and without CAD). Computer-aided detection did not improve intraradiologist performance. Sensitivity was significantly decreased for mammograms interpreted with vs without CAD in the subset of radiologists who interpreted both with and without CAD (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.97). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Computer-aided detection does not improve diagnostic accuracy of mammography. These results suggest that insurers pay more for CAD with no established benefit to women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Rejection bias refers to the conscious or unconscious desensitization to excessive alerts. Alert fatigue is a manifestation of this bias, as clinicians may ignore important alerts owing to an overwhelming number of false alarms [81, 82].”
From Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations (2024) · cites this paper as [81]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction
PEPE, M. S. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198509844.001.0001 · Cited by 2,206
Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)
Liberman, L., & Menell, J. H. (2002) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(01)00017-3 · Cited by 2,159
The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction
PEPE, M. S. (2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s278 · Cited by 1,907
A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations
Rutter, C. M., & Gatsonis, C. (2001) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.942 · Cited by 1,510
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System
Berg, W. A., Campassi, C., LANGENBERG, P. W., & Sexton, M. J. (2000) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741769 · Cited by 1,268
Freer, T. W., & Ulissey, M. J. (2001) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2203001282 · Cited by 748
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
Fenton, J. J., Taplin, S. H., Carney, P. A., Abraham, L., Sickles, E. A., D’Orsi, C. J., Berns, E. A., Cutter, G., Hendrick, R. E., Barlow, W. E., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa066099 · Cited by 619
Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis
Jiang, Y., Nishikawa, R. M., Schmidt, R. A., Metz, C. E., Giger, M. L., & Doi, K. (1999) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/s1076-6332(99)80058-0 · Cited by 310
Gur, D., Sumkin, J. H., Rockette, H. E., Ganott, M. A., Hakim, C. M., Hardesty, L. A., Poller, W. R., Shah, R., & Wallace, L. P. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh067 · Cited by 306
Single Reading with Computer-Aided Detection for Screening Mammography
Gilbert, F. J., Astley, S., Gillan, M. G., Agbaje, O. F., Wallis, M., James, J. J., Boggis, C. R. M., & Duffy, S. W. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0803545 · Cited by 296
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 676
Artificial intelligence for the real world of breast screening
Wallis, M. (2021) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109661 · Cited by 17
Artificial Intelligence Support for Mammography: In-Practice Clinical Experience
Tartar, M., Lina, L., Watanabe, A. T., & Enomoto, A. J. (2021) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2021.09.016 · Cited by 13
Zhou, Y. Y., Feng, B., Yue, W., Liu, Y., Xu, Z.-F., Xing, W., Zhao, X., Yao, J.-C., Wang, S., & Xu, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.997306 · Cited by 13
Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Women's Imaging: Cost-Benefit Analysis
Mayo, R. C., & Leung, J. W. T. (2019) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.18.20419 · Cited by 13
He, B., Yu, G., Zhu, Y., Tong, L., Kong, B., Wang, K., Sun, C., Li, H., Huang, F., Wu, L., et al. (2023) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2023.02.013 · Cited by 13
Karagöz, M. A., Nalbantoğlu, Ö. U., Karaboğa, D., Akay, B., Baştürk, A., Ulutabanca, H., Doğan, S., COŞKUN, D., & DEMİR, O. (2024) · TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCES · doi:10.55730/1300-0632.4076 · Cited by 12
"It depends": Configuring AI to Improve Clinical Usefulness Across Contexts
Zając, H. D., Ribeiro, J., Ingala, S., Gentile, S., Wanjohi, R., Gitau, S. N., Carlsen, J. F., Nielsen, M. B., & Andersen, T. O. (2024) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3643834.3660707 · Cited by 17
Hickman, S. E., Payne, N. R., Black, R. T., Huang, Y., Priest, A. N., Hudson, S. M., Kasmai, B., Juette, A., Nanaa, M., & Gilbert, F. J. (2024) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.233147 · Cited by 12
Longitudinal interpretability of deep learning based breast cancer risk prediction
Klaneček, Ž., Wang, Y., Wagner, T., Cockmartin, L., Marshall, N., Schott, B., Deatsch, A. E., Studen, A., Jarm, K., Krajc, M., et al. (2024) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ad9db3 · Cited by 16
Rodríguez‐Ruiz, A., Mordang, J., Karssemeijer, N., Sechopoulos, I., & Mann, R. M. (2018) · International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI) · doi:10.1117/12.2317937 · Cited by 12
Wu, N., Huang, Z., Shen, Y., Park, J., Phang, J., Makino, T., Kim, S., Cho, K., Heacock, L. C., Moy, L. P., et al. (2021) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-021-00530-6 · Cited by 18
Nicol, E. D., Weir-McCall, J. R., Shaw, L. J., & Williamson, E. E. (2022) · Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography · doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2022.07.005 · Cited by 12
A Review of Computer-Aided Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Sequential Mammograms
Loizidou, K., Skouroumouni, G., Nikolaou, C., & Pitris, C. (2022) · Tomography · doi:10.3390/tomography8060241 · Cited by 12
Machine learning based Breast Cancer screening: trends, challenges, and opportunities
Zizaan, A., & Idri, A. (2023) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Imaging & Visualization · doi:10.1080/21681163.2023.2172615 · Cited by 12
Retson, T., & Eghtedari, M. (2020) · Current Radiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s40134-020-00350-6 · Cited by 12
A deep learning-based automated diagnostic system for classifying mammographic lesions
Yamaguchi, T., Inoue, K., Tsunoda, H. S., Uematsu, T., Shinohara, N., & Mukai, H. (2020) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000020977 · Cited by 12
Artificial Intelligence: Is It Armageddon for Breast Radiologists?
Chiwome, L., Okojie, O. M., Rahman, A., Javed, F., & Hamid, P. (2020) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.8923 · Cited by 12
Chang, A. C. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823337-5.00005-6 · Cited by 12
Elmore, J. G. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802209-2.00001-2 · Cited by 12
Waldock, W. J., Guni, A., Darzi, A. W., & Ashrafian, H. (2026) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001310 · Cited by 14
Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound: The Emerging Future of Modern Medicine
Mahant, S. S., & Varma, A. R. (2022) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.28945 · Cited by 11
Kim, H. J., Choi, W. J., Gwon, H. Y., Jang, S. J., Chae, E. Y., Shin, H. J., Cha, J. H., & Kim, H. H. (2023) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-023-10422-8 · Cited by 10
Challenges and Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology
Winder, A. J., Stanley, E. A. M., Fiehler, J., & Forkert, N. D. (2024) · Clinical Neuroradiology · doi:10.1007/s00062-024-01382-7 · Cited by 12
Artificial Intelligence in Radiology
Mohseni, A., Ghotbi, E., Kazemi, F., Shababi, A., Jahan, S. C., Mohseni, A., & Shababi, N. (2024) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2024.03.008 · Cited by 12
Xing, P., Zhang, L., Wang, T., Wang, L., Xing, W., & Wang, W. (2024) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2024.111997 · Cited by 12
AI in 2D Mammography: Improving Breast Cancer Screening Accuracy
Ciurescu, S., Cerbu, S., Dima, C. N., Borozan, F., Pârvănescu, R., Ilaș, D. G., Cîtu, C., Vernic, C., & Sas, I. (2025) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina61050809 · Cited by 16
What Is Fair? Defining Fairness in Machine Learning for Health
Gao, J., Chou, B., McCaw, Z. R., Thurston, H., Varghese, P., Hong, C., & Gronsbell, J. L. (2025) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.70234 · Cited by 17
Leopold, S. S. (2019) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000000787 · Cited by 11
Chang, T.-Y., Lai, K.-J., Tu, C.-Y., & Wu, J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59317-4 · Cited by 11
Advancing Research on Medical Image Perception by Strengthening Multidisciplinary Collaboration
Treviño, M., Birdsong, G. G., Carrigan, A., Choyke, P. L., Drew, T. W., Eckstein, M. P., Fernandez, A. T., Gallas, B. D., Giger, M. L., Hewitt, S. M., et al. (2021) · JNCI Cancer Spectrum · doi:10.1093/jncics/pkab099 · Cited by 11
Multicenter, Multivendor Validation of an FDA-approved Algorithm for Mammography Triage
Retson, T., Watanabe, A. T., Vu, H., & Chim, C. Y. (2022) · Journal of Breast Imaging · doi:10.1093/jbi/wbac046 · Cited by 11
Amin, M. N., Kamal, R. M., Moustafa, A. F. I., Gomaa, M., Rushdi, M. A., & Mahmoud, A. M. (2023) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104808 · Cited by 13
Considerations for the application of artificial intelligence in vascular surgical education
Rigberg, D. A., & Jim, J. (2023) · Seminars in Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2023.07.004 · Cited by 12
Interval Cancers and Duty of Candour, a UK Perspective
Cornford, E. J., & Sharma, N. (2019) · Current Breast Cancer Reports · doi:10.1007/s12609-019-0304-4 · Cited by 11
Implementation and design of artificial intelligence in abdominal imaging
Choi, H. H., Chang, S. D., & Kohli, M. D. (2020) · Abdominal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00261-020-02471-0 · Cited by 13
Multi-tasking Siamese Networks for Breast Mass Detection Using Dual-View Mammogram Matching
Yan, Y., Conze, P.-H., Lamard, M., Quellec, G., Cochener, B., & Coatrieux, G. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59861-7_32 · Cited by 12
Is the future of breast imaging with AI?
Fuchsjäger, M. (2019) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06286-6 · Cited by 11
Regulating AI Adaptation: An Analysis of AI Medical Device UpdatesPreprint
Wu, K., Wu, E., Rodolfa, K. T., Ho, D. E., & Zou, J. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.06.26.24309506 · Cited by 19
Arzamasov, K. M., Vasilev, Y. A., Vladzymyrskyy, A. V., Omelyanskaya, O. V., Михайлович, Ш. И., Kozhikhina, D. D., Goncharova, I., Gelezhe, P., Kirpichev, Y., Bobrovskaya, T., et al. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11121684 · Cited by 11
Artificial intelligence as a second reader for screening mammography
Nakai, E., Miyagi, Y., Suzuki, K., Pappagallo, A. S., Kayama, H., Matsuba, T., Yang, L., Xu, S., Kelly, C. J., Najafi, R., et al. (2024) · Radiology Advances · doi:10.1093/radadv/umae011 · Cited by 11
Hsu, C.-C., Su, Y., Rittenhouse‐Olson, K., Attwood, K. M., Mojica, W. D., Reid, M. E., Dy, G. K., & Wu, Y. (2024) · Cancer Research Communications · doi:10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0505 · Cited by 10
Bulletti, C., Franasiak, J. M., Busnelli, A., Sciorio, R., Berrettini, M., Aghajanova, L., Bulletti, F. M., & Ata, B. (2024) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings Digital Health · doi:10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.08.007 · Cited by 14
Increasing transparency of computer-aided detection impairs decision-making in visual search
Kunar, M. A., Watson, D., & Montana, G. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02601-5 · Cited by 10
Zając, H. D., Andersen, T. O., Kwasa, E., Wanjohi, R., Onyinkwa, M. K., Mwaniki, E. K., Gitau, S. N., Yaseen, S. S., Carlsen, J. F., Fraccaro, M., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3715115 · Cited by 19
Caldas, F. A. A., Caldas, H. C., Henrique, T., Jordão, P. H. F., Fernandes-Ferreira, R., Souza, D. R. S., & Bauab, S. D. P. (2025) · European Journal of Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.ejrai.2025.100013 · Cited by 10
Alam, K. N., Zadeh, P. B., & Sheikh-Akbari, A. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14153024 · Cited by 12
Ipsilateral Lesion Detection Refinement for Tomosynthesis
Ren, Y., Liu, X., Ge, J., Liang, Z., Xu, X., Grimm, L. J., Go, J., Marks, J. R., & Lo, J. Y.-C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2023.3280135 · Cited by 11
Aljondi, R., Alghamdi, S. S., Tajaldeen, A. A., Alassiri, S. A., Alkinani, M. H., & Bertinotti, T. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app132112087 · Cited by 12
Shafique, A., Gonzalez, R., Pantanowitz, L., Tan, P. H., Machado, A., Cree, I. A., & Tizhoosh, H. R. (2023) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100381 · Cited by 10
Khushalani, J. S., Ekwueme, D. U., Richards, T. B., Sabatino, S. A., Guy, G. P., Zhang, Y., & Tangka, F. K. L. (2019) · Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2018.7543 · Cited by 10
Breast Cancer Lesion Detection and Classification in mammograms using Deep Neural
Silalahi, A. R. J. (2021) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1115/1/012018 · Cited by 10
Artificial Intelligence in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening. A Review
Straňák, Z., Penčák, M., & Veith, M. (2021) · Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology · doi:10.31348/2021/6 · Cited by 11
Richardson, M. L., Amini, B., & Kinahan, P. E. (2022) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2021.11.011 · Cited by 10
Malliori, A., & Pallikarakis, N. E. (2022) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-022-00693-4 · Cited by 11
Large-Scale Mammography CAD with Deformable Conv-Nets
Morrell, S., Wojna, Z., Khoo, C. S., Sebastien Ourselin, A., & Iglesias, J. E. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00946-5_7 · Cited by 10
Kim, R. Y. (2024) · Cancer Biomarkers · doi:10.3233/cbm-230360 · Cited by 12
Chaudhary, N., & Dhunny, A. Z. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1627876 · Cited by 12
Images Are Data: A Breast Imaging Perspective on a Contemporary Paradigm
Dietzel, M., Clauser, P., Kapetas, P., Schulz‐Wendtland, R., & Baltzer, P. (2021) · RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren · doi:10.1055/a-1346-0095 · Cited by 9
Machine Learning System for Lung Neoplasms Distinguished Based on Scleral Data
Huang, Q., Lv, W., Zhou, Z., Tan, S., Lin, X., Bo, Z.-H., Fu, R., Jin, X., Guo, Y., Wang, H., et al. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13040648 · Cited by 9
Artificial intelligence in screening and diagnosis of surgical diseases: A narrative review
Palomba, G., Fernicola, A., Corte, M. D., Capuano, M., Palma, G. D. D., & Aprea, G. (2024) · AIMS Public Health · doi:10.3934/publichealth.2024028 · Cited by 9
Stargazing through the lens of AI in clinical oncology
Lehman, C. D., & Wu, S. (2021) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-021-00307-4 · Cited by 9
Self-citationLin, T., Huang, P., & Cheng, C. W.-C. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom) · doi:10.1109/healthcom.2016.7749517 · Cited by 9
Artificial intelligence in senology—where do we stand and what are the future horizons?
Mundinger, A., & Mundinger, C. (2024) · European Journal of Breast Health · doi:10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2024.2023-12-13 · Cited by 9
Künstliche Intelligenz in der Mammadiagnostik
Bennani‐Baïti, B., & Baltzer, P. (2019) · Der Radiologe · doi:10.1007/s00117-019-00615-y · Cited by 15
Camurdan, O., Tanyel, T., Cerekci, E. A., Alis, D. C., Meltem, E., Denizoğlu, N., Şeker, M. E., Öksüz, İ., & Karaarslan, E. (2025) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1186/s13244-025-01922-w · Cited by 12
Invasive Breast Cancers Missed by AI Screening of Mammograms
Woo, O. H., Song, S. E., Choe, S. J., KIM, M., Cho, K. R., & Seo, B. K. (2025) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.242408 · Cited by 8
A foundation model for breast and lung cancer screening using non-contrast computed tomography
Liang, Z., Niu, Q., Wang, J., Han, C., Li, Q., Wu, Y., Zhu, B., Han, X., Wang, Z., Wang, X., et al. (2026) · Nature Health · doi:10.1038/s44360-026-00055-8 · Cited by 9
Burger, B., Bernathova, M., Seeböck, P., Singer, C. F., Helbich, T. H., & Langs, G. (2023) · European Radiology Experimental · doi:10.1186/s41747-023-00343-y · Cited by 9
External validation of AI algorithms in breast radiology: the last healthcare security checkpoint?
Martín‐Noguerol, T., & Luna, A. (2021) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-20-1409 · Cited by 9
Missing Data Interpolation of Alzheimer’s Disease Based on Column‐by‐Column Mixed Mode
Miao, S., Li, S.-Q., Zheng, X.-Y., Wang, R., Li, J., Ding, S.-S., & Ma, J.-F. (2021) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2021/3541516 · Cited by 8
What Is Needed for Artificial Intelligence to Be Trusted?
Pellikka, P. A., Hamza, I., & Carter, R. E. (2021) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.11.010 · Cited by 8
Kromrey, M., Steiner, L., Schön, F., Gamain, J., Roller, C., & Malsch, C. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12222225 · Cited by 8
Mathur, A., McNally, C. M., Sasson, A. L., Thoreson, N., Sahraian, S., Mendelson, D. S., & Margolies, L. R. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17233878 · Cited by 7
Nuutinen, M., & Leskelä, R. (2023) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-023-00763-1 · Cited by 9
Bahl, M., Kshirsagar, A., Pohlman, S. K., & Lehman, C. D. (2025) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-024-07589-z · Cited by 7
Self-citationHe, Z., Li, Y., Zeng, W., Xu, W., Liu, J., Ma, X., Wei, J., Zeng, H., Xu, Z., Wang, S., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.773389 · Cited by 7
Deep Learning Based Classification of Wrist Cracks from X-ray Imaging
Jabbar, J., Hussain, M., Malik, H., Gani, A., Khan, A. H., & Shiraz, M. (2022) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2022.024965 · Cited by 9
Jawad, M. A., & Khursheed, F. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-15134-1 · Cited by 7
Koo, C., Yang, A., Welch, C., Jadav, V., Posch, L., Thoreson, N., Morris, D., Chouhdry, F. I., Szabo, J. R., Mendelson, D., et al. (2023) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.10.6.061108 · Cited by 7
Artificial Intelligence for Image Interpretation: Point—The Radiologist's Potential Friend
Miles, R. C., & Lehman, C. D. (2021) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.21.25564 · Cited by 7
Self-citationRadiomics: A Primer for Breast Radiologists
Grimm, L. J. (2021) · Journal of Breast Imaging · doi:10.1093/jbi/wbab014 · Cited by 7
Detection of Abnormalities in Mammograms Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Devi, K. S., Sekar, K. T. A., Singh, N., Baroi, S. J., Sah, D. K., & Borahi, K. (2022) · Algorithms for intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-6893-7_37 · Cited by 7
Artificial Intelligence to Support Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms—The Time Has Come
Lehman, C. D. (2020) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3186 · Cited by 7
Self-citationSeyyedi, S., Wong, M. J., Ikeda, D. M., & Langlotz, C. P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.08563 · Cited by 9
Lamb, L. R., Lehman, C. D., Do, S., Kim, K., Langarica, S., & Bahl, M. (2024) · AI in Precision Oncology · doi:10.1089/aipo.2024.0022 · Cited by 6
Self-citationAI-supported approaches for mammography single and double reading: A controlled multireader study
Brancato, B., Magni, V., Saieva, C., Risso, G. G., Buti, F., Catarzi, S., Ciuffi, F., Peruzzi, F., Regini, F., Ambrogetti, D., et al. (2025) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112101 · Cited by 6
Using deep learning to construct microcalcification clusters in a mammography prediction model
Hsu, P.-Y., Xu, J.-L., Chen, L.-L., & Chen, M. (2025) · Innovation and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1142/s2737599425500306 · Cited by 6
Lastrucci, A., Iosca, N., Wandael, Y., Barra, A., Ricci, R., Cucchiari, J. N., Forini, N., Lepri, G., & Giansanti, D. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15172197 · Cited by 7
Sharma, A., Hussain, R., Learoyd, A., Aristidou, A., Soomro, T., BLANDFORD, A. E., Lawrenson, J. G., Grimaldi, G., Douiri, A., Kernohan, A., et al. (2025) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/qndf3325 · Cited by 6
Triage of 2D Mammographic Images Using Multi-view Multi-task Convolutional Neural Networks
Kyono, T., Gilbert, F. J., & van der Schaar, M. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare · doi:10.1145/3453166 · Cited by 7
Imaging Cancer in Neuroradiology
Raslan, O. A. A., Öztürk, A., Oğuz, K. K., Sen, F., Aboud, O., Ivanović, V., Assadsangabi, R., & Hacein‐Bey, L. (2023) · Current Problems in Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.100965 · Cited by 6
Current status and prospects of breast cancer imaging-based diagnosis using artificial intelligence
Sekine, C., & Horiguchi, J. (2024) · International Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s10147-024-02594-0 · Cited by 7
Merchant, F., Choulerton, J., James, R. W., & Pang, C. L. (2025) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1093/bjr/tqaf019 · Cited by 6
Shahrvini, T., Wood, E. J., Joines, M. M., Nguyen, H. B., Hoyt, A. C., Chalfant, J. S., Capiro, N. M., Fischer, C. P., Sayre, J. W., Hsu, W. W. Y., et al. (2025) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.25.33412 · Cited by 6
Leong, L. T., Malkov, S., Drukker, K., Niell, B. L., Sadowski, P., Wolfgruber, T., Greenwood, H. I., Joe, B. N., Kerlikowske, K. M., Giger, M. L., et al. (2021) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-021-00024-0 · Cited by 6
Self-citationMammographically detected asymmetries in the era of artificial intelligence
Hanafy, M. M., Ahmed, A. A. H., & Ali, E. A. (2023) · The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1186/s43055-023-00979-1 · Cited by 6
Deep Learning for Cancer Screening in Medical Imaging
Jeong, J. (2017) · Hanyang Medical Reviews · doi:10.7599/hmr.2017.37.2.71 · Cited by 6
de Vriendt, M., Sellars, P., & Avilés-Rivero, A. I. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60365-6_18 · Cited by 6
Human-Centered AI for Medical Imaging
Liang, Y., He, L., & Chen, X. (2021) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82681-9_16 · Cited by 6
Mexican consensus on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment
Cárdenas-Sánchez, J. (2021) · Gaceta Mexicana de Oncología · doi:10.24875/j.gamo.m21000215 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehman, C. D., Wellman, R. D., Buist, D. S. M., Kerlikowske, K., Tosteson, A. N. A., & Miglioretti, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lehman, Constance D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2015-11-01
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1828
- ISSN
- 2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4836172
- OpenAlex
- W1917647701
- Cited by
- 678
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 20.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (HHSN261201100031C, U54CA163303, P30CA023108, P01CA154292)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Keywords
- computer-aided detection, digital mammography, breast cancer screening, diagnostic accuracy, mammography sensitivity, screen-detected breast cancer, interval breast cancer, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, community practice, radiologist interpretation, breast cancer detection rate, mammography quality assurance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mammography, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Registries, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Logistic Models, Early Detection of Cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review