The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: After the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved computer-aided detection (CAD) for mammography in 1998, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) provided increased payment in 2002, CAD technology disseminated rapidly. Despite sparse evidence that CAD improves accuracy of mammographic interpretations and costs over $400 million a year, CAD is currently used for most screening mammograms in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To measure performance of digital screening mammography with and without CAD in US community practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We compared the accuracy of digital screening mammography interpreted with (n = 495 818) vs without (n = 129 807) CAD from 2003 through 2009 in 323 973 women. Mammograms were interpreted by 271 radiologists from 66 facilities in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Linkage with tumor registries identified 3159 breast cancers in 323 973 women within 1 year of the screening. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mammography performance (sensitivity, specificity, and screen-detected and interval cancers per 1000 women) was modeled using logistic regression with radiologist-specific random effects to account for correlation among examinations interpreted by the same radiologist, adjusting for patient age, race/ethnicity, time since prior mammogram, examination year, and registry. Conditional logistic regression was used to compare performance among 107 radiologists who interpreted mammograms both with and without CAD. RESULTS: Screening performance was not improved with CAD on any metric assessed. Mammography sensitivity was 85.3% (95% CI, 83.6%-86.9%) with and 87.3% (95% CI, 84.5%-89.7%) without CAD. Specificity was 91.6% (95% CI, 91.0%-92.2%) with and 91.4% (95% CI, 90.6%-92.0%) without CAD. There was no difference in cancer detection rate (4.1 in 1000 women screened with and without CAD). Computer-aided detection did not improve intraradiologist performance. Sensitivity was significantly decreased for mammograms interpreted with vs without CAD in the subset of radiologists who interpreted both with and without CAD (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.97). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Computer-aided detection does not improve diagnostic accuracy of mammography. These results suggest that insurers pay more for CAD with no established benefit to women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Rejection bias refers to the conscious or unconscious desensitization to excessive alerts. Alert fatigue is a manifestation of this bias, as clinicians may ignore important alerts owing to an overwhelming number of false alarms [81, 82].”
From Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations (2024) · cites this paper as [81]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction
PEPE, M. S. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198509844.001.0001 · Cited by 2,206
Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)
Liberman, L., & Menell, J. H. (2002) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(01)00017-3 · Cited by 2,159
The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction
PEPE, M. S. (2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s278 · Cited by 1,907
A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations
Rutter, C. M., & Gatsonis, C. (2001) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.942 · Cited by 1,510
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System
Berg, W. A., Campassi, C., LANGENBERG, P. W., & Sexton, M. J. (2000) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741769 · Cited by 1,268
Freer, T. W., & Ulissey, M. J. (2001) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2203001282 · Cited by 748
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
Fenton, J. J., Taplin, S. H., Carney, P. A., Abraham, L., Sickles, E. A., D’Orsi, C. J., Berns, E. A., Cutter, G., Hendrick, R. E., Barlow, W. E., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa066099 · Cited by 619
Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis
Jiang, Y., Nishikawa, R. M., Schmidt, R. A., Metz, C. E., Giger, M. L., & Doi, K. (1999) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/s1076-6332(99)80058-0 · Cited by 310
Gur, D., Sumkin, J. H., Rockette, H. E., Ganott, M. A., Hakim, C. M., Hardesty, L. A., Poller, W. R., Shah, R., & Wallace, L. P. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh067 · Cited by 306
Single Reading with Computer-Aided Detection for Screening Mammography
Gilbert, F. J., Astley, S., Gillan, M. G., Agbaje, O. F., Wallis, M., James, J. J., Boggis, C. R. M., & Duffy, S. W. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0803545 · Cited by 296
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence in radiology
Hosny, A., Parmar, C., Quackenbush, J., Schwartz, L. H., & Aerts, H. J. W. L. (2018) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5 · Cited by 3,803
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening
McKinney, S. M., Sieniek, M., Godbole, V., Godwin, J., Antropova, N., Ashrafian, H., Back, T., Chesus, M., Corrado, G. S., Darzi, A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6 · Cited by 3,287
Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence
Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., & King, D. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2 · Cited by 3,136
Artificial intelligence in healthcare
Yu, K.-H., Beam, A. L., & Kohane, I. S. (2018) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z · Cited by 2,817
Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: General Overview
Lee, J., Jun, S., Cho, Y.-W., Lee, H., Kim, G. B., Seo, J. B., & Kim, N. (2017) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.570 · Cited by 1,328
Deep Learning to Improve Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammography
Shen, L., Margolies, L. R., Rothstein, J. H., Fluder, E., McBride, R., & Sieh, W. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48995-4 · Cited by 1,151
Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions
Kooi, T., Litjens, G., van Ginneken, B., Gubern-Mérida, A., Sánchez, C. I., Mann, R., den Heeten, A., & Karssemeijer, N. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.07.007 · Cited by 965
Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis
Chan, H., Samala, R. K., Hadjiiski, L. M., & Zhou, C. (2020) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33128-3_1 · Cited by 848
Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with Deep Learning
Ribli, D., Horváth, A., Unger, Z., Pollner, P., & Csabai, I. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22437-z · Cited by 696
Deep Neural Networks Improve Radiologists’ Performance in Breast Cancer Screening
Wu, N., Phang, J., Park, J., Shen, Y., Huang, Z., Zorin, M., Jastrzȩbski, S., Févry, T., Katsnelson, J., Kim, E. S., et al. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2945514 · Cited by 736
Rodriguez-Ruiz, A., Lång, K., Gubern-Merida, A., Broeders, M., Gennaro, G., Clauser, P., Helbich, T. H., Chevalier, M., Tan, T., Mertelmeier, T., et al. (2019) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djy222 · Cited by 692
Deep neural network improves fracture detection by clinicians
Lindsey, R., Daluiski, A., Chopra, S., Lachapelle, A. S., Mozer, M. C., Sicular, S., Hanel, D. P., Gardner, M. J., Gupta, A., Hotchkiss, R., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1806905115 · Cited by 667
Detection of Breast Cancer with Mammography: Effect of an Artificial Intelligence Support System
Rodríguez-Ruiz, A., Krupinski, E., Mordang, J.-J., Schilling, K., Heywang-Köbrunner, S. H., Sechopoulos, I., & Mann, R. M. (2019) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2018181371 · Cited by 602
Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations
Ueda, D., Kakinuma, T., Fujita, S., Kamagata, K., Fushimi, Y., Ito, R., Matsui, Y., Nozaki, T., Nakaura, T., Fujima, N., et al. (2024) · Japanese Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1007/s11604-023-01474-3 · Cited by 607
Lång, K., Josefsson, V., Larsson, A.-M., Larsson, S., Högberg, C., Sartor, H., Hofvind, S., Andersson, I., & Rosso, A. (2023) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00298-x · Cited by 598
Swanson, K., Wu, E., Zhang, A., Alizadeh, A. A., & Zou, J. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.035 · Cited by 597
Kim, H.-E., Kim, H. H., Han, B., Kim, K., Han, K., Nam, H., Lee, E. H., & Kim, E. (2020) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30003-0 · Cited by 556
Lee, J., Kim, D., Jeong, S., & Choi, S. (2018) · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science · doi:10.5051/jpis.2018.48.2.114 · Cited by 505
Vollmer, S. J., Mateen, B. A., Bohner, G., Király, F. J., Ghani, R., Jonsson, P. F., Cumbers, S., Jonas, A., McAllister, K., Myles, P. R., et al. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l6927 · Cited by 574
Automated deep-neural-network surveillance of cranial images for acute neurologic events
Titano, J. J., Badgeley, M., Schefflein, J., Pain, M., Su, A., Cai, M., Swinburne, N., Zech, J., Kim, J., Bederson, J., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0147-y · Cited by 458
Role of artificial intelligence in patient safety outcomes: systematic literature review
Choudhury, A., & Asan, O. (2020) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/18599 · Cited by 440
Lotter, W., Diab, A. R., Haslam, B., Kim, J. G., Grisot, G., Wu, E., Wu, K., Onieva, J. O., Boyer, Y., Boxerman, J. L., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-01174-9 · Cited by 423
Schaffter, T., Buist, D. S. M., Lee, C. I., Nikulin, Y., Ribli, D., Guan, Y., Lotter, W., Jie, Z., Du, H., Wang, S., et al. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0265 · Cited by 409
Self-citationDratsch, T., Chen, X., Rezazade Mehrizi, M., Kloeckner, R., Mähringer-Kunz, A., Püsken, M., Baeßler, B., Sauer, S., Maintz, D., & Pinto dos Santos, D. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.222176 · Cited by 369
Deep Learning in Medical Imaging
Kim, M., Yun, J., Cho, Y., Shin, K., Jang, R., Bae, H., & Kim, N. (2019) · Neurospine · doi:10.14245/ns.1938396.198 · Cited by 393
Breast cancer detection using deep learning: Datasets, methods, and challenges ahead
Din, N. M. U., Dar, R. A., Rasool, M., & Assad, A. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106073 · Cited by 385
Computer‐aided diagnosis in the era of deep learning
Chan, H., Hadjiiski, L. M., & Samala, R. K. (2020) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.13764 · Cited by 387
Gerke, S., Babic, B., Evgeniou, T., & Cohen, I. G. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0262-2 · Cited by 359
Peng, Y., Dharssi, S., Chen, Q., Keenan, T. D. L., Agrón, E., Wong, W. T., Chew, E. Y., & Lu, Z. (2018) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.015 · Cited by 363
Sechopoulos, I., Teuwen, J., & Mann, R. M. (2020) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.06.002 · Cited by 376
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cancer imaging
Koh, D., Papanikolaou, N. K., Bick, U., Illing, R. O., Kahn, C. E., Kalpathi-Cramer, J., Matos, C., Martí‐Bonmatí, L., Miles, A., Mun, S. K., et al. (2022) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-022-00199-0 · Cited by 341
With an eye to AI and autonomous diagnosis
Keane, P. A., & Topol, E. J. (2018) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0048-y · Cited by 304
A systematic survey of computer-aided diagnosis in medicine: Past and present developments
Yanase, J., & Triantaphyllou, E. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112821 · Cited by 303
AI-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD): the latest review to read first
Fujita, H. (2020) · Radiological Physics and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12194-019-00552-4 · Cited by 324
Geras, K. J., Mann, R. M., & Moy, L. P. (2019) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2019182627 · Cited by 304
Salim, M., Wåhlin, E., Dembrower, K., Azavedo, E., Foukakis, T., Liu, Y., Smith, K., Eklund, M., & Strand, F. (2020) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3321 · Cited by 301
Sendak, M. P., Ratliff, W., Sarro, D., Alderton, E., Futoma, J., Gao, M., Nichols, M., Revoir, M., Yashar, F., Miller, C., et al. (2020) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/15182 · Cited by 287
Toward robust mammography-based models for breast cancer risk
Yala, A., Mikhael, P. G., Strand, F., Lin, G., Smith, K., Wan, Y.-L., Lamb, L., Hughes, K., Lehman, C., & Barzilay, R. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aba4373 · Cited by 287
Self-citationMachine learning in clinical decision making
Adlung, L., Cohen, Y., Mor, U., & Elinav, E. (2021) · Med · doi:10.1016/j.medj.2021.04.006 · Cited by 321
Artificial intelligence in breast imaging
Le, E., Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Hickman, S. E., & Gilbert, F. J. (2019) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.006 · Cited by 283
Deep convolutional neural networks for mammography: advances, challenges and applications
Abdelhafiz, D., Yang, C., Ammar, R., & Nabavi, S. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-2823-4 · Cited by 274
Interpretive Error in Radiology
Waite, S., Scott, J. A., Gale, B. D., Fuchs, T., Kolla, S. S., & Reede, D. L. (2016) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.16.16963 · Cited by 274
Will Artificial Intelligence Replace Radiologists?
Langlotz, C. P. (2019) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.2019190058 · Cited by 270
Conant, E. F., Toledano, A. Y., Periaswamy, S., Fotin, S. V., Go, J., Boatsman, J. E., & Hoffmeister, J. W. (2019) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.2019180096 · Cited by 243
How does artificial intelligence in radiology improve efficiency and health outcomes?
van Leeuwen, K. G., de Rooij, M., Schalekamp, S., van Ginneken, B., & Rutten, M. J. C. M. (2022) · Pediatric Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00247-021-05114-8 · Cited by 236
Framing the challenges of artificial intelligence in medicine
Yu, K.-H., & Kohane, I. S. (2019) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008551 · Cited by 233
Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Personalized Medicine
Ahn, J. S., Shin, S., Yang, S., Park, E. K., Kim, K. H., Cho, S. I., Ock, C., & Kim, S. (2023) · Journal of Breast Cancer · doi:10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e45 · Cited by 281
The role of artificial intelligence in medical imaging research
Tang, X. (2019) · BJR|Open · doi:10.1259/bjro.20190031 · Cited by 236
Radiological images and machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Zhang, Z., & Sejdić, E. (2019) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.02.017 · Cited by 249
A Deep Learning Model to Triage Screening Mammograms: A Simulation Study
Yala, A., Schuster, T., Miles, R., Barzilay, R., & Lehman, C. (2019) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2019182908 · Cited by 210
Self-citationShen, Y., Wu, N., Phang, J., Park, J., Liu, K., Tyagi, S., Heacock, L. C., Kim, S., Moy, L. P., Cho, K., et al. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101908 · Cited by 222
Rodríguez‐Ruiz, A., Lång, K., Gubern‐Mérida, A., Teuwen, J., Broeders, M. J. M., Gennaro, G., Clauser, P., Helbich, T. H., Chevalier, M. L., Mertelmeier, T., et al. (2019) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06186-9 · Cited by 213
Assessment of Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Classification of Chest Radiographs
Dunnmon, J. A., Yi, D., Langlotz, C. P., Ré, C., Rubin, D. L., & Lungren, M. P. (2019) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2018181422 · Cited by 206
Combining the strengths of radiologists and AI for breast cancer screening: a retrospective analysis
Leibig, C., Brehmer, M., Bunk, S., Byng, D., Pinker, K., & Umutlu, L. (2022) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00070-x · Cited by 225
Rise of the Machines: Advances in Deep Learning for Cancer Diagnosis
Levine, A., Schlosser, C. L., Grewal, J., Coope, R., Jones, S. J. M., & Yip, S. S. F. (2019) · Trends in cancer · doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2019.02.002 · Cited by 208
YOLO Based Breast Masses Detection and Classification in Full-Field Digital Mammograms
Hamed, G., Marey, M. A. E.-R., Amin, S. E.-S., & Tolba, M. F. (2020) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105823 · Cited by 208
Yoon, J. H., Strand, F., Baltzer, P., Conant, E. F., Gilbert, F. J., Lehman, C. D., Morris, E. A., Mullen, L. A., Nishikawa, R. M., Sharma, N., et al. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.222639 · Cited by 217
Self-citationJaremko, J. L., Azar, M., Bromwich, R. J., Lum, A., Cheong, L. H. A., Gibert, M., Laviolette, F., Gray, B., Reinhold, C., Cicero, M. D., et al. (2019) · Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal · doi:10.1016/j.carj.2019.03.001 · Cited by 212
Convolutional neural networks for breast cancer detection in mammography: A survey
Abdelrahman, L., Alghamdi, M., Collado‐Mesa, F., & Abdel-Mottaleb, M. S. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104248 · Cited by 199
Raya-Povedano, J. L., Romero-Martín, S., Elías-Cabot, E., Gubern‐Mérida, A., Rodríguez‐Ruiz, A., & Benito, M. Á. (2021) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2021203555 · Cited by 188
Skaane, P., Bandos, A. I., Niklason, L. T., Sebuødegård, S., Østerås, B. H., Gullien, R., Gur, D., & Hofvind, S. S. H. (2019) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2019182394 · Cited by 173
CAD and AI for breast cancer—recent development and challenges
Chan, H., Samala, R. K., & Hadjiiski, L. M. (2019) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20190580 · Cited by 183
Deep Neural Networks With Region-Based Pooling Structures for Mammographic Image Classification
Shu, X., Zhang, L., Wang, Z., Lv, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2020.2968397 · Cited by 172
Bai, J., Posner, R., Wang, T., Yang, C., & Nabavi, S. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102049 · Cited by 178
Application of Deep Learning in Breast Cancer Imaging
Balkenende, L., Teuwen, J., & Mann, R. M. (2022) · Seminars in Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.02.003 · Cited by 178
Pacilè, S., Lopez, J., Chone, P., Bertinotti, T., Grouin, J. M., & Fillard, P. (2020) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.2020190208 · Cited by 176
Radiomics Improves Cancer Screening and Early Detection
Gillies, R. J., & Schabath, M. B. (2020) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0075 · Cited by 159
AUNet: attention-guided dense-upsampling networks for breast mass segmentation in whole mammograms
Sun, H., Li, C., Liu, B., Liu, Z., Wang, M., Zheng, H., Feng, D. D., & Wang, S. (2019) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab5745 · Cited by 162
Barnett, A. J., Schwartz, F. R., Tao, C., Chen, C., Ren, Y., Lo, J. Y.-C., & Rudin, C. D. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00423-x · Cited by 175
Vasey, B., Ursprung, S., Beddoe, B., Taylor, E. H., Marlow, N., Bilbro, N., Watkinson, P., & McCulloch, P. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1276 · Cited by 154
Prospective implementation of AI-assisted screen reading to improve early detection of breast cancer
Ng, A. Y., Oberije, C., Ambrózay, É., Szabó, E., Serfőző, O., Karpati, E., Fox, G., Glocker, B., Morris, E. A., Forrai, G., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02625-9 · Cited by 176
Computer-aided breast cancer detection and classification in mammography: A comprehensive review
Loizidou, K., Elia, R., & Pitris, C. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106554 · Cited by 166
Photoacoustic imaging of breast cancer: a mini review of system design and image features
Nyayapathi, N., & Xia, J. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Optics · doi:10.1117/1.jbo.24.12.121911 · Cited by 143
Zhang, J., Wu, J., Zhou, X. S., Shi, F., & Shen, D. G. (2023) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2023.09.001 · Cited by 149
Khan, M. H.-M., Boodoo-Jahangeer, N. B., Dullull, W., Nathire, S., Gao, X. W., Sinha, G. R., & Nagwanshi, K. K. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256500 · Cited by 139
Inkpen, K., Chappidi, S., Mallari, K., Nushi, B., Ramesh, D., Michelucci, P., Mandava, V., Vepřek, L. H., & Quinn, G. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3534561 · Cited by 132
Governance of automated image analysis and artificial intelligence analytics in healthcare
Ho, C. W.-L., Soon, D. T. L., Caals, K., & Kapur, J. (2019) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.005 · Cited by 132
Artificial intelligence and deep learning – Radiology's next frontier?
Mayo, R. C., & Leung, J. W. T. (2017) · Clinical Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.11.007 · Cited by 128
Hickman, S. E., Woitek, R., Le, E., Im, Y. R., Luxhøj, C. M., Avilés-Rivero, A. I., Baxter, G. C., Mackay, J., & Gilbert, F. J. (2021) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2021210391 · Cited by 133
Henriksen, E., Carlsen, J. F., Vejborg, I., Nielsen, M. B., & Lauridsen, C. A. (2018) · Acta Radiologica · doi:10.1177/0284185118770917 · Cited by 126
Gao, Y., Geras, K. J., Lewin, A. A., & Moy, L. P. (2019) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.18.20392 · Cited by 128
Applying Data-driven Imaging Biomarker in Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: Preliminary Study
Kim, E., Kim, H.-E., Han, K., Kang, B. J., Sohn, Y., Woo, O. H., & Lee, C. W. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21215-1 · Cited by 121
Mahmood, T., Li, J., Pei, Y., Akhtar, F., Rehman, M. U., & Wasti, S. H. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263126 · Cited by 118
Promises and Perils of Artificial Intelligence in Neurosurgery
Panesar, S. S., Kliot, M., Parrish, R. G., Fernandez-Miranda, J. C., Cagle, Y. D., & Britz, G. W. (2019) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz471 · Cited by 117
Kohli, A., & Jha, S. (2018) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.029 · Cited by 114
Overview of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Medical Imaging
Zheng, D., He, X., & Jing, J. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12020419 · Cited by 113
Artificial Intelligence in Imaging: The Radiologist’s Role
Rubin, D. L. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.036 · Cited by 110
Hickman, S. E., Baxter, G. C., & Gilbert, F. J. (2021) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-021-01333-w · Cited by 110
Teare, P., Fishman, M. D. C., Benzaquen, O., Toledano, E., & Elnekave, E. (2017) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-017-9993-2 · Cited by 110
New machine-learning technologies for computer-aided diagnosis
Lynch, C. J., & Liston, C. M. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0178-4 · Cited by 110
Who Goes First? Influences of Human-AI Workflow on Decision Making in Clinical Imaging
Fogliato, R., Chappidi, S., Lungren, M. P., Fisher, P., Wilson, D., Fitzke, M., Parkinson, M., Horvitz, E., Inkpen, K. M., & Nushi, B. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533193 · Cited by 131
Diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer by high-performance serum metabolic fingerprints
Huang, Y., Du, S., Liu, J., Huang, W., Liu, W., Zhang, M., Li, N., Wang, R., Wu, J., Chen, W., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2122245119 · Cited by 109
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Deep learning approaches to detect breast cancer: a comprehensive review
Sharafaddini, A. M., Esfahani, K. K., & Mansouri, N. (2024) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-024-20011-6 · Cited by 104
RetractedCharacterizing the clinical adoption of medical AI devices through U.S. insurance claims
Wu, K., Wu, E., Theodorou, B., Liang, W., Mack, C., Glass, L., Sun, J., & Zou, J. (2024) · NEJM AI · doi:10.1056/aioa2300030 · Cited by 103
González-Gonzalo, C., Thee, E. F., Klaver, C. C. W., Lee, A. Y., Schlingemann, R. O., Tufail, A., Verbraak, F., & Sánchez, C. I. (2022) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101034 · Cited by 103
Artificial Intelligence for the Future Radiology Diagnostic Service
Mun, S. K., Wong, K. H., Lo, S. B., Li, Y., & Bayarsaikhan, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.614258 · Cited by 106
Tired in the Reading Room: The Influence of Fatigue in Radiology
Waite, S., Kolla, S. S., Jeudy, J. J., Legasto, A. C., Macknik, S. L., Martínez‐Conde, S., Krupinski, E. A., & Reede, D. L. (2016) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.009 · Cited by 100
Kooi, T., van Ginneken, B., Karssemeijer, N., & den Heeten, A. (2017) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12110 · Cited by 105
Watanabe, A. T., Lim, V., Vu, H., Chim, C. Y., Weise, E., Liu, J., Bradley, W. G., & Comstock, C. (2019) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-019-00192-5 · Cited by 96
Hadjiiski, L. M., Cha, K., Chan, H., Drukker, K., Morra, L., Näppi, J. J., Sahiner, B., Yoshida, H., Chen, Q., Deserno, T. M., et al. (2022) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.16188 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehman, C. D., Wellman, R. D., Buist, D. S. M., Kerlikowske, K., Tosteson, A. N. A., & Miglioretti, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lehman, Constance D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2015-11-01
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1828
- ISSN
- 2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4836172
- OpenAlex
- W1917647701
- Cited by
- 678
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 20.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (HHSN261201100031C, U54CA163303, P30CA023108, P01CA154292)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Keywords
- computer-aided detection, digital mammography, breast cancer screening, diagnostic accuracy, mammography sensitivity, screen-detected breast cancer, interval breast cancer, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, community practice, radiologist interpretation, breast cancer detection rate, mammography quality assurance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mammography, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Registries, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Logistic Models, Early Detection of Cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review