Cited by 46Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersTraffic and Road SafetyOlder Adults Driving Studies

Syncope and Motor Vehicle Crash Risk: A Danish Nationwide Study

Open access
Numé, Anna-Karin, Gislason, Gunnar, Christiansen, Christine B., Zahir, Deewa, Hlatky, Mark A., Torp-Pedersen, Christian, Ruwald, Martin H.·2016·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Syncope may have serious consequences for traffic safety. Current clinical guideline recommendations on driving following syncope are primarily based on expert consensus. OBJECTIVE: To identify whether there is excess risk of motor vehicle crashes among patients with syncope compared with the general population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Danish nationwide cohort study from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2012. Through individual-level linkage of nationwide administrative registers, all Danish residents 18 years or older were identified. Of 4 265 301 eligible Danish residents, we identified 41 039 individuals with a first-time diagnosis of syncope from emergency department or hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rate of motor vehicle crashes (including nonfatal and fatal crashes), based on multivariate Poisson regression models, using the total Danish population as reference. RESULTS: The 41 039 patients with syncope had a median age of 66 years (interquartile range [IQR], 47-78 years); 51.0% were women; and 34.8% had cardiovascular disease. Through a median follow-up of 2.0 years (IQR, 0.8-3.3 years), 1791 patients with syncope (4.4%) had a motor vehicle crash, 78.1% of which led to injury (n = 1398) and 0.3% to death (n = 6). The crude incidence rate of motor vehicle crashes was almost doubled among patients with syncope (20.6 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 19.7-21.6) compared with the general population (12.1; 95% CI, 12.0-12.1), with a rate ratio (RR) of 1.83 (95% CI, 1.74-1.91) after adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic position, and relevant comorbidities and pharmacotherapy. Men had a relatively higher rate of motor vehicle crashes (RR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.79-2.03) than women (RR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.63-1.87). The excess risk of motor vehicle crashes persisted throughout the follow-up period. The 5-year crash risk following syncope was 8.2% (95% CI, 7.5%-8.8%) among the population aged 18 to 69 years compared with 5.1% (95% CI, 4.7%-5.4%) in the general population. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Prior hospitalization for syncope was associated with increased risk of motor vehicle crashes throughout the follow-up period. This study suggests that syncope should be considered as one of several factors in a broad assessment of fitness to drive.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.8606

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The main concern in assessing medical fitness to drive for patients with syncope is the risk of causing injury or death to the driver or others as a result of recurrent syncope.

    “The main concern is the risk of causing injury or death to the driver or others as a result of recurrent syncope (691).”

    From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [691]

    The supplied Abstract passage says syncope may have serious consequences for traffic safety and identifies fatal and nonfatal crashes as study outcomes. It does not specifically say that recurrent syncope is the concern or identify injury or death to the driver or others as its consequence. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Numé, A.-K., Gislason, G., Christiansen, C. B., Zahir, D., Hlatky, M. A., Torp-Pedersen, C., & Ruwald, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Aalborg University (DK)
Corresponding author
Numé, Anna-Karin
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2016-04-01
Volume
176
Issue
4
Pages
503
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2287857495
Cited by
46
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF12OC1015957)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Older Adults Driving Studies
Keywords
syncope, traffic accidents, road safety, crash risk, sex differences, cardiovascular disease
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, Risk, Syncope, Cohort Studies, Information Storage and Retrieval, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review