Cited by 93Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentDiversity and Career in MedicineInnovations in Medical Education

Will You Be My Mentor?—Four Archetypes to Help Mentees Succeed in Academic Medicine

Open access
Chopra, Vineet, Arora, Vineet M., Saint, Sanjay·2018·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

The origins of mentoring date back to Odysseus, who entrusted care of his son to Mentor when he set off to fight the Trojan wars. Mentor became a trusted advisor, teacher, and friend to Telemachus, epitomizing the attributes that we look for even today when discussing a mentor. Many textbooks and articles in multiple disciplines have been written about the art of mentorship.1 For example, in medical education, advising programs and professional development during clerkships provide mentoring.2 In a collaboration of mentee and mentor, Straus and Sackett,3 a pioneer in evidence-based medicine, highlighted the following evidence-based reasons why academic clinicians benefit from mentoring: they publish more papers, get more grants, are promoted faster, and are more likely to stay at their academic institutions with greater career satisfaction and self-reliance. More recently, an effort to distill what the best mentors do has also emerged as a question of particular interest in the fast-paced world of management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6537

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The transition from less granular, 'time-based' assessments to CBME and entrustment requires more direct workplace-based observations of trainees, provision of high-quality feedback, and use of highly reliable assessment tools, all of which require transformation in processes, resources, and faculty expectations.

    “The transition from less granular, ‘time-based’ assessments to Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) and entrustment requires more direct workplace-based observations of trainees, provision of high-quality feedback, and use of highly reliable assessment tools, all of which require transformation in processes, resources, and faculty expectations [13,46–48].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chopra, V., Arora, V. M., & Saint, S.
Affiliations
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
  • University of Chicago Medical Center (US)
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2018-02-01
Volume
178
Issue
2
Pages
175
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770136120
Cited by
93
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6
FWCI
11.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
mentoring, mentees, academic medicine careers, career development, academic clinicians, career satisfaction, professional development
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Career Choice, Education, Medical, Faculty, Medical, Humans, Medicine, Staff Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review