Will You Be My Mentor?—Four Archetypes to Help Mentees Succeed in Academic Medicine
Open accessAbstract
The origins of mentoring date back to Odysseus, who entrusted care of his son to Mentor when he set off to fight the Trojan wars. Mentor became a trusted advisor, teacher, and friend to Telemachus, epitomizing the attributes that we look for even today when discussing a mentor. Many textbooks and articles in multiple disciplines have been written about the art of mentorship.1 For example, in medical education, advising programs and professional development during clerkships provide mentoring.2 In a collaboration of mentee and mentor, Straus and Sackett,3 a pioneer in evidence-based medicine, highlighted the following evidence-based reasons why academic clinicians benefit from mentoring: they publish more papers, get more grants, are promoted faster, and are more likely to stay at their academic institutions with greater career satisfaction and self-reliance. More recently, an effort to distill what the best mentors do has also emerged as a question of particular interest in the fast-paced world of management.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The transition from less granular, 'time-based' assessments to CBME and entrustment requires more direct workplace-based observations of trainees, provision of high-quality feedback, and use of highly reliable assessment tools, all of which require transformation in processes, resources, and faculty expectations.
“The transition from less granular, ‘time-based’ assessments to Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) and entrustment requires more direct workplace-based observations of trainees, provision of high-quality feedback, and use of highly reliable assessment tools, all of which require transformation in processes, resources, and faculty expectations [13,46–48].”
Cites
Mentoring Relations: A Definition to Advance Research and Practice
Healy, C. C., & Welchert, A. J. (1990) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x019009017 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Patton, E. W., Griffith, K. A., Jones, R. D., et al. (2017) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9391 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Chopra, V., Edelson, D. P., & Saint, S. K. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.18884 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationDunnington, G. L. (1996) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(95)00028-3 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Vaughn, V. M., Saint, S. K., & Chopra, V. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.12384 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationClinician-trialist rounds: 7. Mentoring: why every clinician-trialist needs to get mentored
Straus, S. E., & Sackett, D. L. (2011) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774511423948 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gonzalo, J. D., Wolpaw, D. R., Krok, K. L., Pfeiffer, M. P., & McCall-Hosenfeld, J. S. (2019) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2019.1591256 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Twelve tips for designing and implementing an academic coaching program
King, S. M., Anas, S., Carnicer Hijazo, R., Jordaan, J., Potter, J. D. F., & Low-Beer, N. (2024) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2024.2308058 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chopra, V., Arora, V. M., & Saint, S.
- Affiliations
- VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
- University of Chicago Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- JAMA Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2018-02-01
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175
- ISSN
- 2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2770136120
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 11.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- mentoring, mentees, academic medicine careers, career development, academic clinicians, career satisfaction, professional development
- MeSH terms
- Mentoring, Career Choice, Education, Medical, Faculty, Medical, Humans, Medicine, Staff Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review