Cited by 310Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPharmacy and Medical PracticesMedication Adherence and Compliance

Effect of an In-Hospital Multifaceted Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on the Risk of Readmission: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Ravn-Nielsen, Lene Vestergaard, Duckert, Marie-Louise, Lund, Mia Lolk, Henriksen, Jolene Pilegaard, Nielsen, Michelle Lyndgaard, Eriksen, Christina Skovsende, Buck, Thomas Croft, Pottegård, Anton +2 more·2018·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

Importance: Hospital readmissions are common among patients receiving multiple medications, with considerable costs to the patients and society. Objective: To determine whether a multifaceted pharmacist intervention based on medication review, patient interview, and follow-up can reduce the number of readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical multicenter study (Odense Pharmacist Trial Investigating Medication Interventions at Sector Transfer [OPTIMIST]) enrolled patients from September 1, 2013, through April 23, 2015, with a follow-up of 6 months completed on October 31, 2015. Consecutive medical patients in an acute admission ward who were 18 years or older and who used 5 or more medications were invited to participate. Of 1873 patients invited to participate, 1499 (80.0%) accepted. The medication review and patient interview were conducted in the hospital and followed up in collaboration with primary care. Analysis was based on intention to treat. Interventions: The patients were randomized into 3 groups receiving usual care (no intervention), a basic intervention (medication review), and an extended intervention (medication review, 3 motivational interviews, and follow-up with the primary care physician, pharmacy, and nursing home). Main Outcomes and Measures: The prespecified primary outcomes were readmission within 30 or 180 days and ED visits within 180 days. The primary composite end point was readmission or an ED visit within 180 days. Secondary outcomes were drug-related readmissions within 30 and 180 days after inclusion, and all-cause mortality and drug-related mortality. Results: A total of 1467 patients (679 men [46.3%] and 788 women [53.7%]; median age, 72 years; interquartile range, 63-80 years) were part of the primary analysis, including 498 randomized to usual care, 493 randomized to the basic intervention, and 476 randomized to the extended intervention. The extended intervention had a significant effect on the numbers of patients who were readmitted within 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46-0.84) or within 180 days (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.90) after inclusion and on the number of patients who experienced the primary composite end point (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.93). The study showed a nonsignificant reduction in drug-related readmissions within 30 days (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.39-1.09) and within 180 days (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59-1.08) after inclusion and in deaths (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.22-3.11). The number needed to treat to achieve the primary composite outcome for the extended intervention (vs usual care) was 12. Conclusions and Relevance: A multifaceted clinical pharmacist intervention may reduce the number of ED visits and hospital readmissions. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03079375.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8274

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature review found one systematic review and meta-analysis containing six RCTs and one additional RCT of vitamin C.

    “Our literature review found one systematic review and meta-analysis (522) (containing six RCTs) and one additional RCT (523).”

    From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [522]

    The Abstract identifies this paper as an additional randomized clinical trial, so it supports the RCT citation. But its intervention was pharmacist-led medication review, interviews, and follow-up—not vitamin C. The six-RCT meta-analysis is attached to a different citation (522), not this paper. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Medication reconciliation has been associated with fewer medication errors and may help reduce hospital readmission.

    “Medication reconciliation has been associated with fewer medication errors [598, 612] and may help reduce hospital readmission [613, 614].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ravn-Nielsen, L. V., Duckert, M.-L., Lund, M. L., Henriksen, J. P., Nielsen, M. L., Eriksen, C. S., Buck, T. C., Pottegård, A., Hansen, M. R., & Hallas, J.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Pharmacy of Funen, Clinical Pharmacy Department, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  • Odense University Hospital (DK)
  • Svendborg Sygehus (DK)
  • Mental Health Services (DK)
  • St Thomas Pharmacy, Vejle, Denmark
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2018-03-01
Volume
178
Issue
3
Pages
375
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793086396
Cited by
310
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 19
FWCI
18.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
hospital readmission, pharmacist intervention, medication review, polypharmacy, motivational interviewing, emergency department visits, drug-related deaths, primary care follow-up, nursing homes, drug safety, patient interviews, secondary prevention, all-cause mortality, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Care Team, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Readmission, Pharmacy Service, Hospital, Drug Prescriptions, Medication Reconciliation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review