Cited by 122Pneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsAntibiotic Use and ResistanceAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus

Empirical anti-MRSA vs standard antibiotic therapy and risk of 30-day mortality in patients hospitalized for pneumonia.

Open access
Jones, Barbara Ellen, Ying, Jian, Stevens, Vanessa, Haroldsen, Candace, He, Tao, Nevers, McKenna, Christensen, Matthew A., Nelson, Richard E. +7 more·2020·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

Importance: Use of empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics for pneumonia has increased owing to concern for resistant organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The association of empirical anti-MRSA therapy with outcomes among patients with pneumonia is unknown, even for high-risk patients. Objective: To compare 30-day mortality among patients hospitalized for pneumonia receiving empirical anti-MRSA therapy vs standard empirical antibiotic regimens. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted of all hospitalizations in which patients received either anti-MRSA or standard therapy for community-onset pneumonia in the Veterans Health Administration health care system from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2013. Subgroups of patients analyzed were those with initial intensive care unit admission, MRSA risk factors, positive results of a MRSA surveillance test, and positive results of a MRSA admission culture. Primary analysis was an inverse probability of treatment-weighted propensity score analysis using generalized estimating equation regression; secondary analyses included an instrumental variable analysis. Statistical analysis was conducted from June 14 to November 20, 2019. Exposures: Empirical anti-MRSA therapy plus standard pneumonia therapy vs standard therapy alone within the first day of hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Risk of 30-day all-cause mortality after adjustment for patient comorbidities, vital signs, and laboratory results. Secondary outcomes included the development of kidney injury and secondary infections with Clostridioides difficile, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species, or gram-negative bacilli. Results: Among 88 605 hospitalized patients (86 851 men; median age, 70 years [interquartile range, 62-81 years]), empirical anti-MRSA therapy was administered to 33 632 (38%); 8929 patients (10%) died within 30 days. Compared with standard therapy alone, in weighted propensity score analysis, empirical anti-MRSA therapy plus standard therapy was significantly associated with an increased adjusted risk of death (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.4 [95% CI, 1.3-1.5]), kidney injury (aRR, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.3-1.5]), and secondary C difficile infections (aRR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.3-1.9]), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp infections (aRR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.0-2.3]), and secondary gram-negative rod infections (aRR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.2-1.8]). Similar associations between anti-MRSA therapy use and 30-day mortality were found by instrumental variable analysis (aRR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.4-1.9]) and among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (aRR, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.2-1.5]), those with a high risk for MRSA (aRR, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.1-1.4]), and those with MRSA detected on surveillance testing (aRR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.3-1.9]). No significant favorable association was found between empirical anti-MRSA therapy and death among patients with MRSA detected on culture (aRR, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.8-1.4]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that empirical anti-MRSA therapy was not associated with reduced mortality for any group of patients hospitalized for pneumonia. These results contribute to a growing body of evidence that questions the value of empirical use of anti-MRSA therapy using existing risk approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.7495

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In undifferentiated patients with pneumonia or sepsis, broad-spectrum regimens active against MRSA are associated with higher mortality, especially in patients without MRSA.

    “Among undifferentiated patients with pneumonia or sepsis, broad-spectrum regimens including agents active against MRSA were associated with higher mortality, particularly among patients without MRSA [137, 151, 155, 156].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, B. E., Ying, J., Stevens, V., Haroldsen, C., He, T., Nevers, M., Christensen, M. A., Nelson, R. E., Stoddard, G. J., Sauer, B. C., Yarbrough, P. M., Jones, M. M., Goetz, M. B., Greene, T., & Samore, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Jones, Barbara Ellen
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2020-04-01
Volume
180
Issue
4
Pages
552
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005615873
Cited by
122
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I50 HX001240, IK2 HX001908)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002538)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Keywords
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, community-onset pneumonia, 30-day mortality, broad-spectrum antibiotics, kidney injury, Clostridium difficile infection, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Gram-negative bacilli, secondary infection, veterans, intensive care unit admission, antibiotic stewardship, antimicrobial resistance
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Staphylococcal, Retrospective Studies, Hospital Mortality, Pneumonia, Bacterial, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review