Cited by 58Healthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringMachine Learning in HealthcareHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Effectiveness of an Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Intervention for Detecting Clinical Deterioration

Open access
Gallo, Robert J., Shieh, Lisa, Smith, Margaret, Marafino, Ben J., Geldsetzer, Pascal, Asch, Steven M., Shum, Kenny, Lin, Steven +3 more·2024·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

Importance: Inpatient clinical deterioration is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality but may be easily missed by clinicians. Early warning scores have been developed to alert clinicians to patients at high risk of clinical deterioration, but there is limited evidence for their effectiveness. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an artificial intelligence deterioration model–enabled intervention to reduce the risk of escalations in care among hospitalized patients using a study design that facilitates stronger causal inference. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used a regression discontinuity design that controlled for confounding and was based on Epic Deterioration Index (EDI; Epic Systems Corporation) prediction model scores. Compared with other observational research, the regression discontinuity design facilitates causal analysis. Hospitalized adults were included from 4 general internal medicine units in 1 academic hospital from January 17, 2021, through November 16, 2022. Exposure: An artificial intelligence deterioration model–enabled intervention, consisting of alerts based on an EDI score threshold with an associated collaborative workflow among nurses and physicians. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was escalations in care, including rapid response team activation, transfer to the intensive care unit, or cardiopulmonary arrest during hospitalization. Results: During the study, 9938 patients were admitted to 1 of the 4 units, with 963 patients (median [IQR] age, 76.1 [64.2-86.2] years; 498 males [52.3%]) included within the primary regression discontinuity analysis. The median (IQR) Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score in the primary analysis cohort was 10 (0-24). The intervention was associated with a −10.4–percentage point (95% CI, −20.1 to −0.8 percentage points; P = .03) absolute risk reduction in the primary outcome for patients at the EDI score threshold. There was no evidence of a discontinuity in measured confounders at the EDI score threshold. Conclusions and Relevance: Using a regression discontinuity design, this cohort study found that the implementation of an artificial intelligence deterioration model–enabled intervention was associated with a significantly decreased risk of escalations in care among inpatients. These results provide evidence for the effectiveness of this intervention and support its further expansion and testing in other care settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0084

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI enhances decision-making capabilities by providing real-time data analysis and early warning scores.

    “On the positive side, AI enhances decision-making capabilities by providing real-time data analysis and early warning scores.”

    From Leading with AI in critical care nursing: challenges, opportunities, and the human factor (2024) · cites this paper as Gallo et al., (2024) [22]

  • AI has the potential to improve patient outcomes through early intervention and reduce the burden of routine tasks on healthcare professionals.

    “This aligns with findings by Gallo et al., (2024) [22], which underscore AI’s potential to improve patient outcomes through early intervention and reduce the burden of routine tasks on healthcare professionals.”

    From Leading with AI in critical care nursing: challenges, opportunities, and the human factor (2024) · cites this paper as Gallo et al., (2024) [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallo, R. J., Shieh, L., Smith, M., Marafino, B. J., Geldsetzer, P., Asch, S. M., Shum, K., Lin, S., Westphal, J., Hong, G., & Li, R. C.
Affiliations
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford Health Care (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Chan Zuckerberg Biohub San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Gallo, Robert J.
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2024-05-01
Volume
184
Issue
5
Pages
557
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393144098
Cited by
58
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 11
FWCI
24.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
clinical deterioration, artificial intelligence, early warning scores, regression discontinuity design, treatment escalation, rapid response team activation, ICU transfer, cardiac arrest, hospitalized patients, general internal medicine, clinical decision support alerts, nurse-physician collaboration
MeSH terms
Clinical Deterioration, Early Warning Score, Aged, Artificial Intelligence, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Cohort Studies, Hospital Rapid Response Team

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review