Cited by 3,036Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisStatistical Methods and Inference

Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs

Open access
Calonico, Sebastian, Cattaneo, Matias D., Titiunik, Rocio·2014·Econometrica

Abstract

In the regression-discontinuity (RD) design, units are assigned to treatment based on whether their value of an observed covariate exceeds a known cutoff. In this design, local polynomial estimators are now routinely employed to construct confidence intervals for treatment effects. The performance of these confidence intervals in applications, however, may be seriously hampered by their sensitivity to the specific bandwidth employed. Available bandwidth selectors typically yield a “large” bandwidth, leading to data-driven confidence intervals that may be biased, with empirical coverage well below their nominal target. We propose new theory-based, more robust confidence interval estimators for average treatment effects at the cutoff in sharp RD, sharp kink RD, fuzzy RD, and fuzzy kink RD designs. Our proposed confidence intervals are constructed using a bias-corrected RD estimator together with a novel standard error estimator. For practical implementation, we discuss mean squared error optimal bandwidths, which are by construction not valid for conventional confidence intervals but are valid with our robust approach, and consistent standard error estimators based on our new variance formulas. In a special case of practical interest, our procedure amounts to running a quadratic instead of a linear local regression. More generally, our results give a formal justification to simple inference procedures based on increasing the order of the local polynomial estimator employed. We find in a simulation study that our confidence intervals exhibit close-to-correct empirical coverage and good empirical interval length on average, remarkably improving upon the alternatives available in the literature. All results are readily available in R and STATA using our companion software packages described in Calonico, Cattaneo, and Titiunik (2014d, 2014b).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3982/ecta11757

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. FRANDSEN, B., M. FRÖLICH, AND B. MELLY (2012): "Quantile Treatments Effects in the Regres- sion Discontinuity Design," Journal of Econometrics, 168 (2), 382-395.
  2. ICHIMURA, H., AND P. E. TODD (2007): "Implementing Nonparametric and Semiparametric Es- timators," in Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 6B, ed. by J. J. Heckman and E. E. Leamer. New York: Elsevier Science B.V., 5369-5468. [2298,2301]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., & Titiunik, R.
Affiliations
  • Dept. of Economics; University of Miami; 5250 University Dr. Coral Gables FL 33124 U.S.A.
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Dept. of Political Science; University of Michigan; 505 S. State St. Ann Arbor MI 48109 U.S.A.
Corresponding author
Cattaneo, Matias D.
Venue
Econometrica
Published
2014-11
Volume
82
Issue
6
Pages
2295-2326
ISSN
0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1537287213
Cited by
3,036
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 293 · 2025: 344 · 2024: 327 · 2023: 321 · 2022: 317 · 2021: 295 · 2020: 285 · 2019: 220 · 2018: 194 · 2017: 197 · 2016: 117 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
149.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Econometrica (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
regression discontinuity design, confidence intervals, loess, bandwidth selection, fuzzy regression discontinuity, average treatment effect, bias correction, standard error estimation, empirical coverage, nonparametric inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review