Cited by 18Diabetes Treatment and ManagementChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesAcute Kidney Injury Research

Effectiveness of Empagliflozin vs Dapagliflozin for Kidney Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes

Open access
Bonnesen, Kasper, Heide-Jørgensen, Uffe, Christensen, Diana H., Christiansen, Christian F., Lash, Timothy L., Hennessy, Sean, Matthews, Anthony A., Pedersen, Lars +2 more·2025·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

Importance: No large randomized clinical trial has directly compared empagliflozin with dapagliflozin, leaving their comparative effectiveness regarding kidney outcomes unknown. Objective: To compare kidney outcomes between initiation of empagliflozin vs dapagliflozin in adults with type 2 diabetes who were receiving antihyperglycemic treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This target trial emulation used nationwide, population-based routinely collected Danish health care data to compare initiation of empagliflozin vs dapagliflozin in adults with type 2 diabetes who received antihyperglycemic treatment between June 1, 2014, and October 31, 2020. Data were analyzed from October 2023 to August 2024. Persons were followed up until an outcome, emigration, death, 6 years, or December 31, 2021, whichever occurred first. Exposure: Initiation of empagliflozin vs dapagliflozin. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included acute kidney injury, incident chronic kidney disease (stages G3 to G5 or stage A2 or A3), and progression of chronic kidney disease (≥40% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline). Risks of kidney outcomes were estimated in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses using an Aalen-Johansen estimator that adjusted for 56 potential confounders and considered death as a competing event. Results: A total of 32 819 individuals who initiated treatment with empagliflozin and 17 464 with dapagliflozin were included (median [IQR] age, 63 [54-71] years; 18 872 female individuals [37.5%]; median [IQR] estimated glomerular filtration rate, 88 [73-104] mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). After weighting, all measured covariates were well balanced between the groups. In intention-to-treat analyses, people who initiated treatment with empagliflozin and dapagliflozin exhibited comparable 6-year risks of acute kidney injury (18.2% vs 18.5%; risk ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91-1.06), chronic kidney disease stages G3 to G5 (11.8% vs 12.1%; risk ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.05), chronic kidney disease stage A2 or A3 (14.8% vs 14.3%; risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.93-1.15), and progression of chronic kidney disease (5.3% vs 5.7%; risk ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.56-1.58). The primary analyses were supported by corresponding per-protocol analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that people with type 2 diabetes who initiated treatment with empagliflozin and dapagliflozin had comparable long-term kidney outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.7381

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The six-year kidney benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors are comparable between empagliflozin and dapagliflozin for AKI, albuminuria, and CKD progression.

    “The six-year kidney benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors are comparable between empagliflozin and dapagliflozin for AKI, albuminuria, and CKD progression (132).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonnesen, K., Heide-Jørgensen, U., Christensen, D. H., Christiansen, C. F., Lash, T. L., Hennessy, S., Matthews, A. A., Pedersen, L., Thomsen, R. W., & Schmidt, M.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Bonnesen, Kasper
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2025-03-01
Volume
185
Issue
3
Pages
314
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406666395
Cited by
17
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7
FWCI
11.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, type 2 diabetes, renal outcomes, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease progression, estimated glomerular filtration rate, SGLT2 inhibitors, comparative effectiveness, target trial emulation, competing risk analysis, Aalen-Johansen estimator
MeSH terms
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Aged, Benzhydryl Compounds, Denmark, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Glucosides, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Acute Kidney Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review