Trends in Racial/Ethnic Representation Among US Medical Students
Open accessAbstract
Importance: With increasing efforts to create a diverse physician workforce that is reflective of the demographic characteristics of the US population, it remains unclear whether progress has been made since 2009, when the Liaison Committee on Medical Education set forth new diversity accreditation guidelines. Objective: To examine demographic trends of medical school applicants and matriculants relative to the overall age-adjusted US population. Design, Setting, and Participants: Repeated cross-sectional study of Association of American Medical Colleges data on self-reported race/ethnicity and sex of medical school applicants and matriculants compared with population distribution of the medical school-aged population (20-34 years). Data from US allopathic medical school applicants and matriculants from 2002 to 2017 were analyzed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Trends were measured using the representation quotient, the ratio of the proportion of a racial/ethnic group in the medical student body to the general age-matched US population. Linear regression estimates were used to evaluate the trend over time for Asian, black, white, Hispanic, American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN), and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander medical school matriculants by sex. Results: The number of medical school applicants increased 53%, from 33 625 to 51 658, and the number of matriculants increased 29.3%, from 16 488 to 21 326, between 2002 and 2017. During that time, proportions of black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander male and female individuals aged 20 to 34 years in the United States increased, while proportions of white male and female individuals decreased and proportions of AIAN male and female individuals were stable. From 2002 to 2017, black, Hispanic, and AIAN applicants and matriculants of both sexes were underrepresented, with a significant trend toward decreased representation for black female applicants from 2002 to 2012 (representation quotient slope, -0.011; 95% CI, -0.015 to -0.007; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Black, Hispanic, and AIAN students remain underrepresented among medical school matriculants compared with the US population. This underrepresentation has not changed significantly since the institution of the Liaison Committee of Medical Education diversity accreditation guidelines in 2009. This study's findings suggest a need for both the development and the evaluation of more robust policies and programs to create a physician workforce that is demographically representative of the US population.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a cross-sectional study of self-reported race/ethnicity of US medical school graduates from 2002 to 2017, numbers and proportions of Black, Hispanic, and American Indian or Alaska Native medical school matriculants increased, but at a rate slower than their age-matched counterparts in the US population, resulting in increased underrepresentation.
“In a cross-sectional study of self-reported race/ethnicity of US medical school graduates from 2002 to 2017, “numbers and proportions of Black, Hispanic, and American Indian or Alaska Native medical school matriculants increased, but at a rate slower than their age-matched counterparts in the US population, resulting in increased underrepresentation” [1].”
From Supporting underrepresented students in health sciences: a fuzzy cognitive mapping approach to program evaluation (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe diversity within the health professions is not increasing at a sufficient rate to reflect the racial, ethnic, and linguistic diversity of the current or future U.S. population.
“Yet, the diversity within the health professions is not increasing at a sufficient rate to reflect the racial, ethnic, and linguistic diversity of the current or future U.S. population.3,5”
From Dreams Realized: A Long-Term Program Evaluation of Three Summer Diversity Pipeline Programs (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
The Discussion reports little improvement in racial and ethnic representation among medical school applicants and matriculants relative to the US population, supporting the claim for the physician pipeline. The Discussion’s Limitations say that other health professions still need to be studied. The paper does not assess linguistic diversity or compare the workforce with projections of the future US population. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- [3]Cohen JJ, Gabriel BA, Terrell C. The case for diversity in the health care workforce. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 21(5): 90- 102. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.5.90 12224912 · DOI · Paper page
- [4]Moy E, Bartman BA. Physician race and care of minority and medically indigent patients. JAMA. 1995; 273(19): 1515- 1520. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03520430051038 7739078 · DOI
- [5]Komaromy M, Grumbach K, Drake M,. The role of black and Hispanic physicians in providing health care for underserved populations. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334(20): 1305- 1310. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605163342006 8609949 · DOI · Paper page
- [6]Boatright DH, Samuels EA, Cramer L,. Association between the Liaison Committee on Medical Education’s diversity standards and changes in percentage of medical student sex, race, and ethnicity. JAMA. 2018; 320(21): 2267- 2269. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13705 30512090 PMC6583477 · DOI
- [7]Deville C, Hwang WT, Burgos R, Chapman CH, Both S, Thomas CR Jr. Diversity in graduate medical education in the united states by race, ethnicity, and sex, 2012. JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 175(10): 1706- 1708. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4324 26301524 · DOI · Paper page
- [8]Guevara JP, Adanga E, Avakame E, Carthon MB. Minority faculty development programs and underrepresented minority faculty representation at US medical schools. JAMA. 2013; 310(21): 2297- 2304. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282116 24302093 · DOI
- [10]Kahle D, Wickham H. ggmap: spatial visualization with ggplot2. R J. 2013; 5(1): 144- 161. doi: 10.32614/RJ-2013-014 · DOI
- [11]Lett LA, Orji WU, Sebro R. Declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine: a longitudinal study of 16 US medical specialties. PLoS One. 2018; 13(11): e0207274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207274 30444928 PMC6239326 · DOI
- [12]Flores RL. The rising gap between rich and poor: a look at the persistence of educational disparities in the United States and why we should worry. Cogent Soc Sci. 2017; 3(1). doi: 10.1080/23311886.2017.1323698 · DOI
- [13]Jackson D. Why am I behind? an examination of low income and minority students’ preparedness for college. McNair Sch J. 2012; 13(4): 121- 138.
- [14]Smedley BD, Stith AY, Colburn L, Evans CH; US Institute of Medicine. Inequality in teaching and schooling: how opportunity is rationed to students of color in America. In: The Right Thing to Do, The Smart Thing to Do: Enhancing Diversity in the Health Professions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK223640/?report=reader. Accessed July 5, 2019. 25057572
- [15]Rothstein R. The racial achievement gap, segregated schools, and segregated neighborhoods: a constitutional insult. Race Soc Probl. 2015; 7(1): 21- 30. doi: 10.1007/s12552-014-9134-1 · DOI
- [17]Sadler GR, Ryujin L, Nguyen T, Oh G, Paik G, Kustin B. Heterogeneity within the Asian American community. Int J Equity Health. 2003; 2(1): 12. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-2-12 14697098 PMC328089 · DOI
- [18]Mukherji BR, Neuwirth LS, Limonic L. Making the case for real diversity: redefining underrepresented minority students in public universities. SAGE Open. 2017; 7(2). doi: 10.1177/2158244017707796 · DOI
- [19]Killick D. Critical intercultural practice: learning in and for a multicultural globalizing world. J Int Students. 2018; 8(3): 1422- 1439. doi: 10.32674/jis.v8i3.64 · DOI
- [20]Mayer KH, Bradford JB, Makadon HJ, Stall R, Goldhammer H, Landers S. Sexual and gender minority health: what we know and what needs to be done. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98(6): 989- 995. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.127811 18445789 PMC2377288 · DOI
- [21]Whitla DK, Orfield G, Silen W, Teperow C, Howard C, Reede J. Educational benefits of diversity in medical school: a survey of students. Acad Med. 2003; 78(5): 460- 466. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200305000-00007 12742780 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How Structural Racism Works — Racist Policies as a Root Cause of U.S. Racial Health Inequities
Bailey, Z. D., Feldman, J. M., & Bassett, M. T. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmms2025396 · Cited by 1,598 · see citing works
Dreams Realized: A Long-Term Program Evaluation of Three Summer Diversity Pipeline Programs
Stephenson-Hunter, C., Strelnick, A. H., Rodriguez, N., Stumpf, L. A., Spano, H., & Gonzalez, C. M. (2021) · Health Equity · doi:10.1089/heq.2020.0126 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Understanding Ethical Challenges in Medical Education Research
Klitzman, R. L. (2022) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000004253 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Chiang, D. F., Guerrero, S. A., Sexton, E. C., & Gardner, S. S. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05292-7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lett, E., Murdock, H. M., Orji, W. U., Aysola, J., & Sebro, R.
- Affiliations
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of Pennsylvania Health System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aysola, Jaya
- Sebro, Ronnie
- Venue
- JAMA Network Open
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-09-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e1910490
- ISSN
- 2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6727686
- OpenAlex
- W2971894355
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 74.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- racial and ethnic diversity, medical students, medical school applicants, underrepresentation, Liaison Committee on Medical Education, medical workforce diversity, Black medical students, Association of American Medical Colleges, demographic trends
- MeSH terms
- Workforce, Adult, Career Choice, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Personnel Selection, Physicians, Schools, Medical, Students, Medical, Students, Premedical, United States, Cultural Diversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review