CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesEmergency and Acute Care StudiesGun Ownership and Violence Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of Selective and Universal Screening for Suicide Risk in a Pediatric Emergency Department

Open access
DeVylder, Jordan E., Ryan, Taylor C., Cwik, Mary, Wilson, Mary Ellen, Jay, Samantha, Nestadt, Paul S., Goldstein, Mitchell, Wilcox, Holly C.·2019·JAMA Network Open
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14070PMC PMC6822088
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Importance: According to National Patient Safety Goal 15.01.01, all individuals being treated or evaluated for behavioral health conditions as their primary reason for care in hospitals and behavioral health care organizations accredited by The Joint Commission should be screened for suicide risk using a validated tool. Existing suicide risk screens have minimal or no high-quality evidence of association with future suicide-related outcomes. Objective: To test the association between results of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) instrument in a pediatric emergency department (ED), implemented through selective and universal screening approaches, and subsequent suicide-related outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study at an urban pediatric ED in the United States, the ASQ was administered to youths aged 8 to 18 years with behavioral and psychiatric presenting problems from March 18, 2013, to December 31, 2016 (selective condition), and then to youths aged 10 to 18 years with medical presenting problems (in addition to those aged 8-18 years with behavioral and psychiatric presenting problems) from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018 (universal condition). Exposure: Positive ASQ screen at baseline ED visit. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were subsequent ED visits with suicide-related presenting problems (ie, ideation or attempts) based on electronic health records and death by suicide identified through state medical examiner records. Association with suicide-related outcomes was calculated over the entire study period using survival analyses and at 3-month follow-up for both conditions using relative risk. Results: The complete sample was 15 003 youths (7044 [47.0%] male; 10 209 [68.0%] black; mean [SD] age, 14.5 [3.1] years at baseline). The follow-up for the selective condition was a mean (SD) of 1133.7 (433.3) days; for the universal condition, it was 366.2 (209.2) days. In the selective condition, there were 275 suicide-related ED visits and 3 deaths by suicide. In the universal condition, there were 118 suicide-related ED visits and no deaths during the follow-up period. Adjusting for demographic characteristics and baseline presenting problem, positive ASQ screens were associated with greater risk of suicide-related outcomes among both the universal sample (hazard ratio, 6.8 [95% CI, 4.2-11.1]) and the selective sample (hazard ratio, 4.8 [95% CI, 3.5-6.5]). Conclusions and Relevance: Positive results of both selective and universal screening for suicide risk in pediatric EDs appear to be associated with subsequent suicidal behavior. Screening may be a particularly effective way to detect suicide risk among those who did not present with ideation or attempt. Future studies should examine the impact of screening in combination with other policies and procedures aimed at reducing suicide risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14070

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 23 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–108 of 108

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
DeVylder, J. E., Ryan, T. C., Cwik, M., Wilson, M. E., Jay, S., Nestadt, P. S., Goldstein, M., & Wilcox, H. C.
Affiliations
  • Fordham University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
Corresponding author
Wilcox, Holly C.
ORCID
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2019-10-25
Volume
2
Issue
10
Pages
e1914070
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14070
PMC
PMC6822088
OpenAlex
W2981677884
Cited by
109
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
12.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (YIG-1-042-16)
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (U79SM061751)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Keywords
suicide risk screening, Ask Suicide-Screening Questions, ASQ, pediatric emergency department, universal screening, targeted screening, suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, suicide mortality, adolescents, suicide prevention, National Patient Safety Goals, behavioral health, screening tool validation, hospital accreditation, Joint Commission, electronic health records
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Child, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Risk Factors, Suicide, Attempted, Risk Assessment, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review