Cited by 123Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesEmergency and Acute Care StudiesInjury Epidemiology and Prevention

Identification of At-Risk Youth by Suicide Screening in a Pediatric Emergency Department

Open access
Ballard, Elizabeth D., Cwik, Mary, Van Eck, Kathryn, Goldstein, Mitchell, Alfes, Clarissa, Wilson, Mary Ellen, Virden, Jane M., Horowitz, Lisa M. +1 more·2017·Prevention Science

Abstract

The pediatric emergency department (ED) is a critical location for the identification of children and adolescents at risk for suicide. Screening instruments that can be easily incorporated into clinical practice in EDs to identify and intervene with patients at increased suicide risk is a promising suicide prevention strategy and patient safety objective. This study is a retrospective review of the implementation of a brief suicide screen for pediatric psychiatric ED patients as standard of care. The Ask Suicide Screening Questions (ASQ) was implemented in an urban pediatric ED for patients with psychiatric presenting complaints. Nursing compliance rates, identification of at-risk patients, and sensitivity for repeated ED visits were evaluated using medical records from 970 patients. The ASQ was implemented with a compliance rate of 79 %. Fifty-three percent of the patients who screened positive (237/448) did not present to the ED with suicide-related complaints. These identified patients were more likely to be male, African American, and have externalizing behavior diagnoses. The ASQ demonstrated a sensitivity of 93 % and specificity of 43 % to predict return ED visits with suicide-related presenting complaints within 6 months of the index visit. Brief suicide screening instruments can be incorporated into standard of care in pediatric ED settings. Such screens can identify patients who do not directly report suicide-related presenting complaints at triage and who may be at particular risk for future suicidal behavior. Results have the potential to inform suicide prevention strategies in pediatric EDs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-016-0717-5

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies show the ASQ has high sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive validity, and can detect patients at risk for suicide that depression screening alone fails to identify.

    “Studies show the ASQ has high sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive validity, and that it can detect patients at risk for suicide that depression screening alone fails to identify.40-42”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballard, E. D., Cwik, M., Van Eck, K., Goldstein, M., Alfes, C., Wilson, M. E., Virden, J. M., Horowitz, L. M., & Wilcox, H. C.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Ballard, Elizabeth D.
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2016-09-27
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
174-182
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W2524022793
Cited by
123
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (U79SM061751)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Keywords
suicide risk screening, pediatric emergency department, at-risk youth, suicide prevention, Ask Suicide-Screening Questions, nursing compliance, screening sensitivity and specificity, psychiatric patients, externalizing disorders, African American adolescents, suicide risk identification
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review