Cited by 58Influenza Virus Research StudiesCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Comparison of Estimated Excess Deaths in New York City During the COVID-19 and 1918 Influenza Pandemics

Open access
Faust, Jeremy Samuel, Lin, Zhenqiu, del Rio, Carlos·2020·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

This cohort study compares the excess deaths in New York City during the peak of the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic with those during the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17527

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Almost a third (32%) of mothers delivered their baby during the height of the pandemic in New York City (March-May 2020).

    “Almost a third (32%) of mothers delivered their baby during the height of the pandemic in New York City (March–May 2020 [23]).”

    From Material Hardship and Stress from COVID-19 in Immigrant Chinese American Families with Infants (2022) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Methods section (page unavailable) studies the New York City COVID-19 outbreak from March 11 to May 11, 2020, supporting the date and location attached to the citation. The paper calls this the outbreak’s “early period,” not its height, and does not report the percentage of mothers who delivered during it. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faust, J. S., Lin, Z., & del Rio, C.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
  • Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
Corresponding author
Faust, Jeremy Samuel
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2020-08-13
Volume
3
Issue
8
Pages
e2017527
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048600053
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 6
FWCI
9.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
excess mortality, COVID-19 pandemic, 1918 influenza pandemic, H1N1 influenza, New York City, pandemic comparison, mortality estimation
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Influenza, Human, New York City, Pneumonia, Viral, Coronavirus Infections, History, 20th Century, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review