Cited by 28Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

Comparative effectiveness of generic vs brand-name levothyroxine in achieving normal thyrotropin levels.

Open access
Brito, Juan P., Ross, Joseph S., Sangaralingham, Lindsey, Dutcher, Sarah K., Graham, David J., Wang, Zhong, Wu, Yute, Yao, Xiaoxi +4 more·2020·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: Whether the use of generic vs brand levothyroxine affects thyrotropin levels remains unclear. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of generic vs brand levothyroxine in achieving and maintaining normal thyrotropin levels among new users. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, 1:1 propensity score-matched longitudinal cohort study used the OptumLabs Data Warehouse administrative claims database linked to laboratory results from commercially insured and Medicare Advantage enrollees throughout the United States. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with thyrotropin levels ranging from 4.5 to 19.9 mIU/L who initiated use of generic or brand-name levothyroxine from January 1, 2008, to October 1, 2017. Data were analyzed from August 13, 2018, to October 25, 2019. Exposure: Patients received generic or brand-name levothyroxine. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of patients with normal vs markedly abnormal thyrotropin levels (<0.1 or >10 mIU/L) within 3 months and with stable thyrotropin levels within 3 months after the thyrotropin value fell into the normal range. Results: A total of 17 598 patients were included (69.0% female; 74.0% White; mean [SD] age, 55.1 [16.0] years), of whom 15 299 filled generic and 2299 filled brand-name levothyroxine prescriptions during the study period. Among 4570 propensity score-matched patients (mean [SD] age, 50.3 [13.8] years; 3457 [75.6%] female; 3510 [76.8%] White), the proportion with normal thyrotropin levels within 3 months of filling levothyroxine prescriptions was similar for patients who received generic vs brand-name levothyroxine (1722 [75.4%; 95% CI, 71.9%-79.0%] vs 1757 [76.9%; 95% CI, 73.4%-80.6%]; P = .23), as was the proportion with markedly abnormal levels (94 [4.1%; 95% CI, 3.4%-5.0%] vs 88 [3.9%; 95% CI, 3.1%-4.7%]; P = .65). Among 1034 propensity score-matched patients who achieved a normal thyrotropin value within 3 months of initiation of levothyroxine, the proportion maintaining subsequent normal thyrotropin levels during the next 3 months was similar for patients receiving generic vs brand-name levothyroxine (427 [82.6%] vs 433 [83.8%]; P = .62). Conclusions and Relevance: Initiation of generic vs brand-name levothyroxine formulations was associated with similar rates of normal and stable thyrotropin levels. These results suggest that generic levothyroxine as initial therapy for mild thyroid dysfunction is as effective as brand-name levothyroxine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17645

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brito, J. P., Ross, J. S., Sangaralingham, L., Dutcher, S. K., Graham, D. J., Wang, Z., Wu, Y., Yao, X., Smallridge, R. C., Bernet, V., Shah, N. D., & Lipska, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Brito, Juan P.
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2020-09-30
Volume
3
Issue
9
Pages
e2017645
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3089363251
Cited by
28
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (U01FD005938)
  • Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (U01FD005938)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
levothyroxine, generic drugs, brand-name drugs, thyroid-stimulating hormone, TSH levels, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, thyroid hormone replacement, drug effectiveness, Medicare Advantage, commercially insured patients, new users, adverse drug reactions, drug shortages
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Medicare, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Drug Prescriptions, Retrospective Studies, Thyroid Diseases, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, United States, Databases, Factual, Drugs, Generic, Treatment Outcome, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review