Cited by 192Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsHealthcare Systems and Technology

Prevalence and characteristics of telehealth utilization in the United States.

Open access
Fischer, Shira H., Ray, Kristin N., Mehrotra, Ateev, Bloom, Erika Litvin, Uscher-Pines, Lori·2020·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: Telehealth services, which allow patients to communicate with a remotely located clinician, are increasingly available; however, prevalence of telehealth use, including videoconferencing visits, remains unclear. Objective: To measure the use of and willingness to use telehealth modalities across the US population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study, conducted between February 2019 and April 2019, asked participants about their use of different telehealth modalities, reasons for not using videoconferencing visits, and willingness to use videoconferencing visits. Questions were continuously posed to panel members and closed after 2555 responses were obtained, at which point 3932 panel members had been invited, for a 65.0% response rate. Exposures: Demographic characteristics (ie, age, sex, race, rural/urban residency, education level, and income). Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported use of specific telehealth modalities, reasons for nonuse, and willingness to use videoconferencing in the future. Results: A total of 2555 individuals completed the survey with a mean (SD) age of 57.2 (14.2) years; 1453 respondents (weighted percentage, 51.9%) were women, and 2043 (weighted percentage, 73.4%) were White individuals. Overall, 1343 respondents (weighted percentage, 50.8%) reported use of a nontelephone telehealth modality, ranging from 873 respondents (weighted percentage, 31.9%) for patient portals and 89 respondents (weighted percentage, 4.2%) for videoconferencing visits. Although 1309 respondents (weighted percentage, 49.2%) overall answered that they were willing or very willing to use videoconferencing visits, respondents who were Black individuals (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.91), aged older than 65 years (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.40-0.66), or had less education (high school or less vs advanced degrees: OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.25-0.56) were less likely to express willingness. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite the focused policy attention on videoconferencing visits, the results of this survey study suggest that other forms of telehealth were more dominant prior to 2020. Targeted efforts may be necessary for videoconferencing visits to reach patient groups who are older or have less education, and payer policies supporting other forms of telemedicine may be appropriate to enhance access.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22302

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]Frist B Telemedicine: a solution to address the problems of cost, access, and quality. Health Affairs Blog. Published July 23, 2015 Accessed January 27, 2020. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20150723.049490/full/ · DOI
  2. [8]AmericanWell American Well’s 2019 Consumer Survey finds majority of consumers open to telehealth, adoption continues to grow [press release]. Published August 27 2019 Accessed September 9, 2020. https://www.americanwell.com/press-release/american-wells-2019-consumer-survey-finds-majority-of-consumers-open-to-telehealth-adoption-continues-to-grow/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fischer, S. H., Ray, K. N., Mehrotra, A., Bloom, E. L., & Uscher-Pines, L.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia
Corresponding author
Fischer, Shira H.
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2020-10-26
Volume
3
Issue
10
Pages
e2022302
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093985629
Cited by
192
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 31
FWCI
24.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
telemedicine, patient portals, telehealth utilization, barriers to telehealth, demographic disparities, racial disparities, older adults, educational inequality, urban-rural differences, United States population, health care access, remote patient care, telehealth policy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Prevalence, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review