Cited by 110Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Assessing Missing Data Assumptions in EHR-Based Studies: A Complex and Underappreciated Task

Open access
Haneuse, Sebastien, Arterburn, David, Daniels, Michael J.·2021·JAMA Network Open

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0184

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selection bias can arise when other factors influence missing data, making it often more appropriate to address gaps with statistical tools such as multiple imputation rather than simply excluding patients with missing data.

    “While simply excluding patients with missing data before training is an option in some cases, selection bias can arise when other factors influence missing data 147 , and it is often more appropriate to address these gaps with statistical tools, such as multiple imputation 148”

    From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [147]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haneuse, S., Arterburn, D., & Daniels, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Haneuse, Sebastien
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2021-02-26
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
e210184
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133400829
Cited by
110
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
missing data, electronic health records, missing data imputation, sensitivity analysis, causal inference, observational studies
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Humans, Patient Dropouts, Statistics as Topic, Selection Bias, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review