Cited by 37Peripheral Artery Disease ManagementLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Prescribing of Statins After Lower Extremity Revascularization Procedures in the US

Open access
Singh, Nikhil, Ding, Li, Devera, Justin, Magee, Gregory A., Garg, Parveen K.·2021·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: The use of statins in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease remains suboptimal despite strong clinical practice guideline recommendations; however, it is unknown whether rates are associated with substantial improvements after lower extremity revascularization. Objective: To report longitudinal trends of statin use in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing lower extremity revascularization and to identify the clinical and procedural characteristics associated with prescriptions for new statin therapy at discharge. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study using data from the Vascular Quality Initiative registry of patients who underwent lower extremity peripheral artery disease revascularization from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2019. The Vascular Quality Initiative is a multicenter registry database including academic and community-based hospitals throughout the US. Patients aged 18 years or older undergoing lower extremity revascularization with available statin data (preprocedure and postprocedure) were included. Those not receiving statin therapy for medical reasons were excluded from final analyses. Exposures: Patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization for whom statin therapy is indicated. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the clinical and procedural characteristics associated with new statin prescription for patients not already taking a statin preprocedure. The overall rates of statin prescription as well as rates of new statin prescription at discharge were determined. In addition, the clinical, demographic, and procedural characteristics associated with new statin prescription were analyzed. Results: There were 172 025 procedures corresponding to 125 791 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.7 [11.0] years; 107 800 men [62.7%]; and 135 405 White [78.7%]) included in the analysis. Overall rates of statin prescription at discharge improved from 17 299 of 23 093 (75%) in 2014 to 29 804 of 34 231 (87%) in 2019. However, only 12 790 of 42 020 patients (30%) not already taking a statin at the time of revascularization during the study period were newly discharged with a statin medication. New statin prescription rates were substantially lower after endovascular intervention (7745 of 29 581 [26%]) than after lower extremity bypass (5045 of 12 439 [41%]). Body mass index of 30 or greater (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.24; P < .001), diabetes (diet-controlled vs no diabetes, OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.05-1.41; P = .01), smoking (current vs never, OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.21-1.45; P < .001), hypertension (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09-1.29; P < .001), and coronary heart disease (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.17-1.35; P < .001) were associated with an increased likelihood of new statin prescription after endovascular intervention, whereas female sex, older age, antiplatelet use, and prior peripheral revascularization were associated with a decreased likelihood. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, although statin use was associated with a substantial improvement after lower extremity revascularization, more than two-thirds of patients not already taking a statin preprocedure remained not taking a statin at discharge. Further investigations to understand the clinical implications of these findings and develop clinician- and system-based interventions are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.36014

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, N., Ding, L., Devera, J., Magee, G. A., & Garg, P. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Garg, Parveen K.
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2021-12-03
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
e2136014
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3216092490
Cited by
37
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Knowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Chicago (cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Keywords
statin prescribing, peripheral arterial disease, endovascular intervention, surgical revascularization, guideline adherence, Vascular Quality Initiative registry, prescribing trends, statin adverse effects
MeSH terms
Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Postoperative Period, Drug Prescriptions, Registries, Retrospective Studies, United States, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Logistic Models, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Lower Extremity, Peripheral Arterial Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review