Cited by 7Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesHealthcare Policy and ManagementDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Changes in nursing home use following Medicaid-supported expanded access to home- and community-based services for older adults with dementia

Open access
Harrison, Jordan M., Sheng, Flora, Josberger, Raina E., Liu, Harry H., Stone, Patricia W., Luchsinger, José A., Dick, Andrew W.·2023·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: New York State's Medicaid managed long-term care (MLTC) program expanded access to home- and community-based services, providing an alternative to nursing home care for people with dementia. Between 2012 and 2015, the state implemented mandatory MLTC for dual Medicare and Medicaid enrollees requiring more than 120 days of community-based long-term care. Objective: To evaluate changes in nursing home use among older adults with dementia following MLTC implementation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used longitudinal data from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019, from the Minimum Data Set and Medicare administrative data. The study sample included New York State Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older with dementia. New York City residents were excluded due to insufficient pre-study period data. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019. Exposure: Mandatory MLTC enrollment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Longitudinal models were used to evaluate changes in annual days of nursing home use following the staggered implementation of MLTC across 13 regions of the state. Two models were estimated: (1) a logistic regression model for any nursing home use in a given year and (2) a linear regression model of total nursing home days, conditional on any nursing home use. Models included annual event-time indicators specified as years until or since MLTC implementation. To capture MLTC effects for dual enrollees relative to non-dual Medicare enrollees, models included interaction terms for dual enrollment and event-time indicators. Results: This sample included 463 947 Medicare beneficiaries with dementia who lived in New York State between 2011 and 2019 (50.2% younger than 85 years; 64.4% women). Implementation of MLTC was associated with lower odds of nursing home use among dual enrollees, ranging from 8% lower odds 2 years post implementation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.86-0.98]) to 24% lower odds 6 years post implementation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.69-0.84]). Compared with a scenario of no MLTC, MLTC implementation was associated with an 8% reduction in annual days of nursing home use between 2013 and 2019 (mean, -5.6 [95% CI, -6.1 to -5.1] days per year). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that implementation of mandatory MLTC in New York State was associated with less nursing home use among dual enrollees with dementia and that MLTC may help prevent or delay nursing home placement among older adults with dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22520

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More supportive policy environments, such as the Netherlands' government-funded nursing homes or Medicaid alternatives in the United States, were reported to ease financial strain and promote smoother transitions into home or community-based care.

    “In contrast, more supportive policy environments, such as the Netherlands’ government-funded nursing homes or Medicaid alternatives in the United States, were reported to ease financial strain and promote smoother transitions into home or community-based care (Groenvynck et al., 2022; Harrison et al., 2023).”

    From Mind the gap: a systematic review of barriers, facilitators, and experiences of care transitions for people living with dementia and their informal caregivers. (2026) · cites this paper as Harrison et al., 2023

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The National Imperative to Improve Nursing Home Quality: Honoring Our Commitment to Residents, Families, and Staff. National Academies Press; 2022. 36198022

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, J. M., Sheng, F., Josberger, R. E., Liu, H. H., Stone, P. W., Luchsinger, J. A., & Dick, A. W.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
  • NutritionQuest (United States) (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
Corresponding author
Harrison, Jordan M.
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2023-07-10
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
e2322520
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383710627
Cited by
7
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG069787, K24AG045334)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
nursing home use, home and community-based services, dementia, older adults, long-term care, New York State, policy implementation, Medicare beneficiaries, Minimum Data Set, New York City
MeSH terms
Aged, Community Health Services, Dementia, Female, Medicare, Humans, Male, Medicaid, New York City, Nursing Homes, United States, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review