Cited by 5Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients

Home insulin pump use in hospitalized children with type 1 diabetes

Open access
Owens, Jodi, Courter, Joshua, Schuler, Christine L., Lawrence, Michelle, Hornung, Lindsey, Lawson, Sarah·2024·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: Pediatric data on inpatient home insulin pumps are absent in the literature. Understanding safety of home insulin pumps, managed by patients or caregivers, during times of illness will help diabetes technology securely move into pediatric hospitals. Objective: To examine whether insulin can be safely and accurately delivered to hospitalized children through home insulin pumps when managed by patients or caregivers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study included children with insulin-dependent diabetes admitted to a tertiary children’s hospital from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. In all these patients, diabetes was the primary or secondary diagnosis on admission. Exposure: Insulin delivery via home insulin pump, hospital insulin pump, or subcutaneous injection. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hyperglycemia (glucose, >250 mg/dL) and hypoglycemia (glucose, <45 mg/dL) rates (quantified as the proportion of total insulin-days), glucose variability, and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) recurrences were compared for hospital pumps (manual mode), home pumps (manual mode), and subcutaneous injections using bivariate tests. Results: There were 18 096 insulin-days among 2738 patients aged 0.5 to 25 years (median age, 15.8 years [IQR, 12.3-18.3 years]). Overall, 990 (5.5%) of insulin-days involved hospital insulin pumps, and 775 (4.3%) involved home pumps. A total of 155 insulin-days (15.7%) involving hospital pumps were hyperglycemic, compared with 209 (27.0%) involving home pumps and 7374 (45.2%) involving injections (P < .001). Moderate hypoglycemia days comprised 31 insulin-days (3.1%) involving hospital pumps compared with 35 (4.5%) involving home pumps and 830 (5.1%) involving injections (P = .02). Severe hypoglycemia did not differ significantly according to insulin delivery method. Two patients using injections (0.01%) developed DKA; no patients using hospital or home pumps developed DKA. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, home insulin pump use was found to be safe in a children’s hospital regarding hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. These data support use of home insulin pumps during pediatric admissions in patients who do not require intensive care and without active DKA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54595

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An observational study in children demonstrated improvement in individual satisfaction and improved detection of glycemic excursions with continued use of personal devices.

    “An observational study in children demonstrated improvement in individual satisfaction and improved detection of glycemic excursions with continued use of personal devices (60).”

    From 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Methods describe a retrospective study of hospitalized children using home insulin pumps, and the Discussion reports fewer hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic days with home pumps than with injections (page not provided). The paper does not report improved individual satisfaction or test whether personal devices improved detection of glycemic excursions; it measured glucose outcomes instead. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [1]The National Academies Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine. The Role of Human Factors in Home Health Care: Workshop Summary. The National Academies Press; 2020.
  2. [3]Kamrath C, Tittel SR, Kapellen TM,. Early versus delayed insulin pump therapy in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes: results from the multicentre, prospective diabetes follow-up DPV registry. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021; 5(1): 17- 25. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30339-4 33253630 · DOI
  3. [4]Blackman SM, Raghinaru D, Adi S,. Insulin pump use in young children in the T1D exchange clinic registry is associated with lower hemoglobin A1c levels than injection therapy. Pediatr Diabetes. 2014; 15(8): 564- 572. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12121 24494980 · DOI
  4. [5]Wallia A, Umpierrez GE, Rushakoff RJ,; DTS Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital Panel. Consensus statement on inpatient use of continuous glucose monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017; 11(5): 1036- 1044. doi: 10.1177/1932296817706151 28429611 PMC5950996 · DOI
  5. [8]Grunberger G, Bailey TS, Cohen AJ,; AACE Insulin Pump Management Task Force. Statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Consensus Panel on insulin pump management. Endocr Pract. 2010; 16(5): 746- 762. doi: 10.4158/EP.16.5.746 21356638 · DOI
  6. [9]Umpierrez GE, Klonoff DC. Diabetes technology update: use of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring in the hospital. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41(8): 1579- 1589. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0002 29936424 PMC6054505 · DOI
  7. [10]Cook CB, Beer KA, Seifert KM, Boyle ME, Mackey PA, Castro JC. Transitioning insulin pump therapy from the outpatient to the inpatient setting: a review of 6 years’ experience with 253 cases. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012; 6(5): 995- 1002. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600502 23063024 PMC3570832 · DOI
  8. [11]Kannan S, Satra A, Calogeras E, Lock P, Lansang MC. Insulin pump patient characteristics and glucose control in the hospitalized setting. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 8(3): 473- 478. doi: 10.1177/1932296814522809 24876608 PMC4455446 · DOI
  9. [12]Bailon RM, Partlow BJ, Miller-Cage V,. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (insulin pump) therapy can be safely used in the hospital in select patients. Endocr Pract. 2009; 15(1): 24- 29. doi: 10.4158/EP.15.1.24 19211393 · DOI
  10. [13]Grunberger G, Abelseth JM, Bailey TS,. Consensus Statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology insulin pump management task force. Endocr Pract. 2014; 20(5): 463- 489. doi: 10.4158/EP14145.PS 24816754 · DOI
  11. [14]Montero AR, Dubin JS, Sack P, Magee MF. Future technology-enabled care for diabetes and hyperglycemia in the hospital setting. World J Diabetes. 2019; 10(9): 473- 480. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v10.i9.473 31558981 PMC6748879 · DOI
  12. [15]Noschese ML, DiNardo MM, Donihi AC,. Patient outcomes after implementation of a protocol for inpatient insulin pump therapy. Endocr Pract. 2009; 15(5): 415- 424. doi: 10.4158/EP09063.ORR 19491071 · DOI
  13. [16]Yeh T, Yeung M, Mendelsohn Curanaj FA. Managing patients with insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors in the hospital: to wear or not to wear. Curr Diab Rep. 2021; 21(2): 7. doi: 10.1007/s11892-021-01375-7 33449214 PMC7810103 · DOI
  14. [18]American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Diabetes care in the hospital: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(Suppl 1):S295-S306. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S016 PMC10725815 38078585 · DOI
  15. [20]Clements JN, Castelli G, Meade LT, Odom JM. A guide for the pharmacist’s role in insulin pump management during transitions of care. Clin Pharm Forum. 2021; 4(3): 352- 363. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1352 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Owens, J., Courter, J., Schuler, C. L., Lawrence, M., Hornung, L., & Lawson, S.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lawson, Sarah
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2024-02-07
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
e2354595
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391598120
Cited by
5
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, hospitalized children, subcutaneous insulin injection, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, glycemic variability, diabetic ketoacidosis, diabetes technology, pediatric hospitalization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Hospitalized, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Glucose, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Insulin, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Insulin, Regular, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review