Cited by 17Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsStress and Burnout Research

Digital Meditation to Target Employee Stress: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Radin, Rachel M., Vacarro, Julie, Fromer, Elena, Ahmadi, Sarah E., Guan, Joanna Y., Fisher, Sarah M., Pressman, Sarah D., Hunter, John F. +7 more·2025·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: Mindfulness meditation may improve well-being among employees; however, effects of digital meditation programs are poorly understood. Objective: To evaluate the effects of digital meditation vs a waiting list condition on general and work-specific stress and whether greater engagement in the intervention moderates these effects. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial included a volunteer sample of adults (aged ≥18 years) employed at a large academic medical center who reported mild to moderate stress, had regular access to a web-connected device, and were fluent in English. Exclusion criteria included being a regular meditator. Participants were recruited from May 16, 2018, through September 28, 2019, and completed baseline, 8-week, and 4-month measures assessing stress, job strain, burnout, work engagement, mindfulness, depression, and anxiety. Data were analyzed from March 2023 to October 2024. Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to a digital meditation program or the waiting list control condition. Participants in the intervention group were instructed to complete 10 minutes of meditation per day for 8 weeks. The control group was instructed to continue their normal activities and not add any meditation during the study period. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score at 8 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included changes in job strain, measured as work effort-reward imbalance. Results: A total of 1458 participants (mean [SD] age, 35.54 [10.30] years; 1178 [80.80%] female) were included. Those randomized to meditation (n = 728) vs waiting list (n = 730) showed improvements in PSS (Cohen d , 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96) and in all secondary outcome measures (eg, job strain: Cohen d , 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23-0.46) at 8 weeks. These improvements were maintained at 4 months after randomization (PSS: Cohen d , 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.84; job strain: Cohen d , 0.37; 95% CI, 0.25-0.50). Those using the app from 5 to 9.9 min/d vs less than 5 min/d showed greater reduction in stress (mean PSS score difference, −6.58; 95% CI, −7.44 to −5.73). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that a brief, digital mindfulness-based program is an easily accessible and scalable method for reducing perceptions of stress. Future work should seek to clarify mechanisms by which such interventions contribute to improvements in work-specific well-being. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03527303

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54435

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Ibrahim F, Samsudin EZ, Chen XW, Toha HR. The prevalence and work-related factors of burnout among public health workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Occup Environ Med. 2022;64(1):e20-e27. doi:10.1097/JOM. 0000000000002428 · DOI
  2. Khubchandani J, Sharma S, Webb FJ, Wiblishauser MJ, Bowman SL. Post-lockdown depression and anxiety in the USA during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Public Health (Oxf). 2021;43(2):246-253. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdaa250 · DOI
  3. Wei H, Aucoin J, Kuntapay GR, et al. The prevalence of nurse burnout and its association with telomere length pre and during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0263603. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263603 · DOI
  4. Goh J, Pfeffer J, Zenios SA. The relationship between workplace stressors and mortality and health costs in the United States. Manage Sci. 2016;62(2):608-628. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2115 · DOI
  5. Lee YJ, Yun J, Kim T. Stress-and work-related burnout in frontline health-care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021;17:e38. doi:10.1017/dmp.2021.279 · DOI
  6. Harshana P. Work related stress: a literature review. Annals of Social Sciences & Management Studies. 2018;2 (3):59-65. doi:10.19080/ASM.2018.02.555586 · DOI
  7. Ganster DC, Rosen CC. Work stress and employee health: a multidisciplinary review. J Manage. 2013;39(5): 1085-1122. doi:10.1177/0149206313475815 · DOI
  8. Martin L, Hauret L, Fuhrer C. Digitally transformed home office impacts on job satisfaction, job stress and job productivity: COVID-19 findings. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0265131. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265131 · DOI
  9. Jamieson SD, Tuckey MR. Mindfulness interventions in the workplace: a critique of the current state of the literature. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22(2):180-193. doi:10.1037/ocp0000048 · DOI
  10. Brown KW, Ryan RM, Creswell JD. Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychol Inq. 2007;18(4):211-237. doi:10.1080/10478400701598298 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Carolan S, Harris PR, Cavanagh K. Improving employee well-being and effectiveness: systematic review and meta-analysis of web-based psychological interventions delivered in the workplace. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19 (7):e271. doi:10.2196/jmir.7583 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4): 385-396. doi:10.2307/2136404 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Cohen S. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: Spacapan S, Oskamp S, eds. The Social Psychology of Health. Sage Publications Inc; 1988:31-67.
  14. Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, et al. The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(8):1483-1499. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00351-4 · DOI
  15. Salmela-Aro K, Rantanen J, Hyvönen K, Tilleman K, Feldt T. Bergen Burnout Inventory: reliability and validity among Finnish and Estonian managers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011;84(6):635-645. doi:10.1007/s00420- 010-0594-3 · DOI
  16. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(4):701-716. doi:10.1177/0013164405282471 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB; Patient Health Questionnaire Primary Care Study Group. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ Primary Care Study. JAMA. 1999;282(18):1737-1744. doi:10. 1001/jama.282.18.1737
  18. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092-1097. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Crosswell AD, Moreno PI, Raposa EB, et al. Effects of mindfulness training on emotional and physiologic recovery from induced negative affect. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;86:78-86. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017. 08.003 · DOI
  20. Gavrilova L, Zawadzki MJ. Examining how headspace impacts mindfulness mechanisms over an 8-week app-based mindfulness intervention. Mindfulness (N Y). 2023;14(9):2236-2249. doi:10.1007/s12671-023-02214-4 · DOI
  21. Radin RM, Epel ES, Mason AE, et al. Impact of digital meditation on work stress and health outcomes among adults with overweight: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023;18(3):e0280808. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0280808 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radin, R. M., Vacarro, J., Fromer, E., Ahmadi, S. E., Guan, J. Y., Fisher, S. M., Pressman, S. D., Hunter, J. F., Sweeny, K., Tomiyama, A. J., Hofschneider, L. T., Zawadzki, M. J., Gavrilova, L., Epel, E. S., & Prather, A. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of California, Merced (US)
Corresponding author
Prather, Aric A.
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2025-01-14
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e2454435
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406365834
Cited by
17
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 4
FWCI
20.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (U24AG072699, R24AG048024)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT011048)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, occupational stress, perceived stress, job strain, burnout, work engagement, employee well-being, anxiety and depression, job resources, job outcomes
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, Psychological Well-Being, Adult, Burnout, Professional, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Meditation, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review