Cited by 14Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Cardiovascular events in individuals treated with sulfonylureas or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors

Open access
Turchin, Alexander, Petito, Lucia C., Hegermiller, Emma, Carnahan, Ryan, DeVries, Andrea, Goel, Satyender, Lansang, M. Cecilia, McDonnell, Marie E. +28 more·2025·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: Sulfonylureas are commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D). Research findings on cardiovascular risk associated with sulfonylureas have been inconsistent. Objective: To emulate a target trial that compares the risk of cardiovascular events after initiation of treatment with individual sulfonylureas or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4is). Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness research study included individuals with T2D and moderate cardiovascular risk treated with metformin monotherapy who received care at 1 of 10 US health systems or were insured by 1 of 2 large health insurance plans between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2023. Data were analyzed from July 2024 to March 2025. Exposure: Initiation of treatment with a sulfonylurea (glimepiride, glipizide, or glyburide) or a DPP4i (reference category) as a second line therapy after metformin. Main Outcomes and Measurements: The primary outcome was a 4-point composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-4): myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure hospitalization, or cardiovascular death (from any of these conditions). The 5-year risks of each outcome were estimated. Results: Among 48 165 eligible individuals (median [IQR] age, 61 [52-69] years; 22 674 female [47.1%]; median [IQR] hemoglobin A 1C , 7.8% [7.3%-8.5%]; median [IQR] low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 89 mg/dL [70-112 mg/dL]), 18 147 started glipizide, 14 282 started glimepiride, 1887 started glyburide, and 13 849 started a DPP4i. Over the median (IQR) follow-up of 37 (20-64) months, 3158 individuals (6.6%) experienced a MACE-4. The estimated 5-year risks of MACE-4 were 8.1% (95% CI, 7.5%-8.7%) for DPP4i, 8.4% (95% CI, 6.8%-9.9%) for glyburide, 8.6% (95% CI, 7.9%-9.2%) for glimepiride, and 9.1% (95% CI, 8.7%-9.7%) for glipizide. Compared with DPP4is, the 5-year risk ratio of MACE-4 was 1.13 (95% CI, 1.03-1.23) for glipizide, 1.07 (95% CI, 0.96-1.16) for glimepiride, and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.83-1.24) for glyburide. Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness research study of sulfonylureas vs DPP4i in patients with T2D, the risk of MACE-4 events was highest for glipizide. These findings suggest that sulfonylureas, glipizide in particular, may not be the optimal agent in treatment of individuals with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.23067

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent analysis found that the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was highest with glipizide.

    “a recent analysis found that the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was highest with glipizide”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [125]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [38]Hollis A. Me-too drugs: is there a problem. ResearchGate. Published December 13, 2004. Accessed June 16, 2025. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228919661_Me-too_drugs_Is_there_a_problem

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turchin, A., Petito, L. C., Hegermiller, E., Carnahan, R., DeVries, A., Goel, S., Lansang, M. C., McDonnell, M. E., Nair, V., Priest, E., Willey, V. J., Kaul, A. F., Hernán, M. A., BESTMED Study Research Group, Bah, H., Barlocker, J., Bride, D. L., Churchilles, E., Douros, M., Gryzlak, B., Hansen, C. W., Hess, R., Horne, B., Kean, J., Knudson, P., Melendez, V., Ortman, C., Ryu, G.-Y., Sidebottom, A., Smith, C., Song, X., Spinka, C., Stoddard, A., Taylor, B., VanWormer, J., & Zhong, H.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Indus Consulting, Inc, Chicago, Illinois
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Humana (United States) (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Baylor Scott & White Research Institute (US)
  • Carelon Research (United States) (US)
  • Medical Outcomes Management, Inc, Sharon, Massachusetts
  • CAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • for the BESTMED Study Research Group
Corresponding author
Turchin, Alexander
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2025-07-24
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
e2523067
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412628968
Cited by
14
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, type 2 diabetes, major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular risk, glipizide, glimepiride, glibenclamide, metformin, second-line therapy, cardiovascular safety, comparative effectiveness, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure hospitalization, cardiovascular mortality, TARGET trial
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glyburide, Glipizide, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors, Comparative Effectiveness Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review