Cited by 28Global Health and SurgeryAdvances in Oncology and RadiotherapyBiotechnology and Related Fields

Barriers and opportunities for cancer clinical trials in low- and middle-income countries

Open access
Eldridge, Linsey, Goodman, Nina R., Chtourou, Amina, Galassi, Annette, Monge, Cecilia, Cira, Mishka Kohli, Pearlman, Paul C., Loehrer, Patrick J. +2 more·2025·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: Clinical trials represent the gold standard to test the safety and efficacy of new or updated approaches to treatments that will inform quality cancer care. However, cancer trials enroll few patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), are often led by investigators from high-income countries, and do not adequately reflect global disease burden or population diversity. Objective: To identify key challenges and strategies to advance contextually relevant, quality cancer trials in LMICs. Design, Setting, and Participants: The survey used in this survey study was available in English, Arabic, French, Portuguese, and Spanish and was conducted by the US National Cancer Institute from October 18 to December 22, 2023. Clinicians with experience in cancer therapeutic clinical trials in LMICs were eligible. The survey covered their professional background and views on challenges and strategies for improving clinical trial opportunities in LMICs. Analysis was performed from April 2 to August 26, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Respondents were asked to rate 34 challenges by impact on their ability to conduct cancer trials using a 4-point Likert scale and 8 strategies by importance using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics summarized participants' backgrounds, challenges, and priorities. Results: Of 453 respondents who began the survey, a total of 223 (49%) were eligible for inclusion, and 131 of those (59%) completed the survey in full. Among the 133 respondents who provided gender data, 81 (61%) were male. In all, 107 of 130 respondents (82%) were affiliated with LMIC institutions, 65 of 223 (29%) were medical oncologists, and 52 of 133 (39%) were midcareer. Financial challenges were rated as the most impactful, with 133 of 170 respondents (78%) rating difficulty obtaining funding for investigator-initiated trials as having a large impact on ability to carry out a trial. Human capacity issues followed, with 105 of 192 respondents (55%) rating lack of dedicated research time as having a large impact. Increasing opportunities for funding and improving human capacity were reported as key strategies to advance capacity to conduct clinical trials in LMICs. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study of clinicians with clinical trial experience in LMICs suggests that adequate funding and a well-trained research workforce are 2 predominant challenges to advancing cancer therapeutic clinical trials in LMICs. Understanding these obstacles can inform efforts to support cancer clinical trials that better reflect worldwide needs and diversity by prioritizing and sustaining research led by LMIC investigators.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.7733

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eldridge, L., Goodman, N. R., Chtourou, A., Galassi, A., Monge, C., Cira, M. K., Pearlman, P. C., Loehrer, P. J., Gopal, S., & Ginsburg, O.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Leidos Biomedical Research Inc. (United States) (US)
  • Indiana University Health (US)
Corresponding author
Eldridge, Linsey
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2025-04-28
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
e257733
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409886594
Cited by
28
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 5
FWCI
25.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Biotechnology and Related Fields
Keywords
cancer clinical trials, low- and middle-income countries, barriers to clinical trials, research funding, investigator-initiated trials, research capacity, research workforce, research capacity building, clinical trial recruitment, global health equity, research governance
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Trials as Topic, Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review