Cited by 171Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Associations Between Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers, Neurodegeneration, and Cognition in Cognitively Normal Older People

Open access
Wirth, Miranka, Villeneuve, Sylvia, Haase, Claudia M., Madison, Cindee M., Oh, Hwamee, Landau, Susan M., Rabinovici, Gil D., Jagust, William J.·2013·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) propose β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques to initiate neurodegeneration within AD-affected regions. However, some cognitively normal older individuals harbor neural injury similar to patients with AD, without concurrent Aβ burden. Such findings challenge the proposed sequence and suggest that Aβ-independent precursors underlie AD-typical neurodegenerative patterns. OBJECTIVE To examine relationships between Aβ and non-Aβ factors as well as neurodegeneration within AD regions in cognitively normal older adults. The study quantified neurodegenerative abnormalities using imaging biomarkers and examined cross-sectional relationships with Aβ deposition; white matter lesions (WMLs), a marker of cerebrovascular disease; and cognitive functions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study in a community-based convenience sample of 72 cognitively normal older individuals (mean [SD] age, 74.9 [5.7] years; 48 women; mean [SD] 17.0 [1.9] years of education) of the Berkeley Aging Cohort. INTERVENTION: Each individual underwent a standardized neuropsychological test session, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography scanning. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For each individual, 3 AD-sensitive neurodegeneration biomarkers were measured: hippocampal volume, glucose metabolism, and gray matter thickness, the latter 2 sampled from cortical AD-affected regions. To quantify neurodegenerative abnormalities, each biomarker was age adjusted, dichotomized into a normal or abnormal status (using cutoff thresholds derived from an independent AD sample), and summarized into 0, 1, or more than 1 abnormal neurodegenerative biomarker. Degree and topographic patterns of neurodegenerative abnormalities were assessed and their relationships with cognitive functions, WML volume, and Aβ deposition (quantified using carbon 11-labeled Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography). RESULTS: Of our cognitively normal elderly individuals, 40% (n = 29) displayed at least 1 abnormal neurodegenerative biomarker, 26% (n = 19) of whom had no evidence of elevated Pittsburgh compound B retention. In those people who were classified as having abnormal cortical thickness, degree and topographic specificity of neurodegenerative abnormalities were similar to patients with AD. Accumulation of neurodegenerative abnormalities was related to poor memory and executive functions as well as larger WML volumes but not elevated Pittsburgh compound B retention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our study confirms that a substantial proportion of cognitively normal older adults harbor neurodegeneration, without Aβ burden. Associations of neurodegenerative abnormalities with cerebrovascular disease and cognitive performance indicate that neurodegenerative pathology can emerge through non-Aβ pathways within regions most affected by AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4013

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rate of cognitive decline is significantly greater for cognitively impaired and CU individuals who have abnormalities in both an amyloid biomarker and a second biomarker type (CSF T-tau or P-tau, atrophy, or hypometabolism) in comparison to individuals who have neither or only one of these biomarker abnormalities.

    “The rate of cognitive decline is significantly greater for cognitively impaired and CU individuals who have abnormalities in both an amyloid biomarker and a second biomarker type (which could be CSF T-tau or P-tau, atrophy, or hypometabolism) in comparison to individuals who have neither or only one of these biomarker abnormalities [30–35,39,40,42–45].”

    From NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease (2018) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says amyloid burden and neural injury can interact to lower cognition, which supports the general relevance of both biomarker types. But the study is cross-sectional: it does not establish a significantly greater rate of cognitive decline for people with both abnormalities than for those with one or neither, or establish that comparison across cognitively impaired and cognitively unimpaired people. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The combination of an abnormal MRI, CSF T-tau, or FDG PET study with an abnormal amyloid biomarker provides much more powerful prediction of future cognitive decline than an abnormal amyloid study alone.

    “However, the combination of an abnormal MRI, CSF T-tau, or FDG PET study with an abnormal amyloid biomarker provides much more powerful prediction of future cognitive decline [30–35,39,40,42–45] than an abnormal amyloid study alone.”

    From NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease (2018) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says neural injury and amyloid burden can interact to lower cognition, and suggests that accumulating neurodegenerative abnormalities could increase the risk of future decline. But the Methods describe cross-sectional analyses, and this paper does not show that combining MRI, CSF T-tau, or FDG-PET with an amyloid biomarker predicts future decline more powerfully than an abnormal amyloid study alone. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [2]Sperling RA Aisen PS Beckett LA Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease Alzheimers Dement 2011 7 3 280 292 21514248 PMC3220946
  2. [4]Knopman DS Jack CR Jr Wiste HJ Brain injury biomarkers are not dependent on β-amyloid in normal elderly published online November 23, 2012 Ann Neurol 10.1002/ana.23816 PMC3660408 23424032 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [6]Liao D Cooper L Cai J Presence and severity of cerebral white matter lesions and hypertension, its treatment, and its control: the ARIC Study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Stroke 1996 27 12 2262 2270 8969791
  4. [7]Breteler MM van Swieten JC Bots ML Cerebral white matter lesions, vascular risk factors, and cognitive function in a population-based study: the Rotterdam Study Neurology 1994 44 7 1246 1252 8035924
  5. [8]Raji CA Lopez OL Kuller LH White matter lesions and brain gray matter volume in cognitively normal elders Neurobiol Aging 2012 33 4 e7 e16 21943959 PMC3248984
  6. [9]Hedden T Van Dijk KRA Shire EH Sperling RA Johnson KA Buckner RL Failure to modulate attentional control in advanced aging linked to white matter pathology Cereb Cortex 2012 22 5 1038 1051 21765181 PMC3328340
  7. [10]Marchant NL Reed BR DeCarli CS Cerebrovascular disease, β -amyloid, and cognitionin aging Neurobiol Aging 2012 33 5 e25 e36 22048124 PMC3274647
  8. [11]Yesavage JA Brink TL Rose TL Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report J Psychiatr Res 1982-1983 17 1 37 49 7183759
  9. [12]Folstein MF Folstein SE McHugh PR “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician J Psychiatr Res 1975 12 3 189 198 1202204
  10. [15]Joshi A Koeppe RA Fessler JA Reducing between scanner differences in multi-center PET studies Neuroimage 2009 46 1 154 159 19457369 PMC4308413
  11. [16]Mormino EC Kluth JT Madison CM Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Episodic memory loss is related to hippocampal-mediated beta-amyloid deposition in elderly subjects Brain 2009 132 pt 5 1310 1323 19042931 PMC2677792
  12. [17]Logan J Fowler JS Volkow ND Wang GJ Ding YS Alexoff DL Distribution volume ratios without blood sampling from graphical analysis of PET data J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996 16 5 834 840 8784228
  13. [19]Oh H Mormino EC Madison C Hayenga A Smiljic A Jagust WJ β -Amyloid affects frontal and posterior brain networks in normal aging Neuroimage 2011 54 3 1887 1895 20965254 PMC3038633
  14. [21]Fischl B Dale AM Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000 97 20 11050 11055 10984517 PMC27146
  15. [22]Park HJ Lee JD Chun JW Cortical surface-based analysis of 18F-FDG PET: measured metabolic abnormalities in schizophrenia are affected by cortical structural abnormalities Neuroimage 2006 31 4 1434 1444 16540349
  16. [24]Jagust W Gitcho A Sun F Kuczynski B Mungas D Haan M Brain imaging evidence of preclinical Alzheimer's disease in normal aging Ann Neurol 2006 59 4 673 681 16470518
  17. [25]Dickerson BC Stoub TR Shah RC Alzheimer-signature MRI biomarker predicts AD dementia in cognitively normal adults Neurology 2011 76 16 1395 1402 21490323 PMC3087406
  18. [26]den Heijer T Geerlings MI Hoebeek FE Hofman A Koudstaal PJ Breteler MMB Use of hippocampal and amygdalar volumes on magnetic resonance imaging to predict dementia in cognitively intact elderly people Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006 63 1 57 62 16389197
  19. [27]Desikan RS McEvoy LK Thompson WK Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Amyloid-β–associated clinical decline occurs only in the presence of elevated P-tau Arch Neurol 2012 69 6 709 713 22529247 PMC3423526
  20. [28]Wirth M Oh H Mormino EC Markley C Landau SM Jagust WJ The effect of amyloid β on cognitive decline is modulated by neural integrity in cognitively normal elderly published online March 7, 2013 Alzheimers Dement 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.10.012 PMC3823816 23474040 · DOI
  21. [29]Storandt M Mintun MA Head D Morris JC Cognitive decline and brain volume loss as signatures of cerebral amyloid-beta peptide deposition identified with Pittsburgh compound B: cognitive decline associated with Abeta deposition Arch Neurol 2009 66 12 1476 1481 20008651 PMC2796577
  22. [30]Becker JA Hedden T Carmasin J Amyloid-β associated cortical thinning in clinically normal elderly Ann Neurol 2011 69 6 1032 1042 21437929 PMC3117980
  23. [31]Oh H Madison C Villeneuve S Markley C Jagust WJ Association of gray matter atrophy with age, β-amyloid, and cognition in aging published online February 6, 2013 Cereb Cortex 10.1093/cercor/bht017 PMC4014182 23389995 · DOI
  24. [32]Resnick SM Sojkova J Zhou Y Longitudinal cognitive decline is associated with fibrillar amyloid-beta measured by [11C]PiB Neurology 2010 74 10 807 815 20147655 PMC2839197
  25. [33]Snitz BE Weissfeld LA Lopez OL Cognitive trajectories associated with β-amyloid deposition in the oldest-old without dementia Neurology 2013 80 15 1378 1384 23516317 PMC3662268
  26. [34]Heister D Brewer JB Magda S Blennow K McEvoy LK Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Predicting MCI outcome with clinically available MRI and CSF biomarkers Neurology 2011 77 17 1619 1628 21998317 PMC3198979

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wirth, M., Villeneuve, S., Haase, C. M., Madison, C. M., Oh, H., Landau, S. M., Rabinovici, G. D., & Jagust, W. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Wirth, Miranka
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2013-10-28
Volume
70
Issue
12
Pages
1512-9
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074980270
Cited by
171
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 1
FWCI
15.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (131515)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG010129, P01 AG1972403, K01AG030514, AG034570, K23AG031861, R01AG034570, P50AG023501)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, neurodegeneration, amyloid-beta, Pittsburgh compound B, white matter lesions, hippocampal volume, glucose metabolism, cortical thickness, cognitive function, memory, executive function, cerebrovascular disease, cognitively normal older adults, neurodegeneration biomarkers, carbon-11
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Aniline Compounds, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Thiazoles, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review