Cited by 93Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Comparing moral judgments of patients with frontotemporal dementia and frontal stroke

Open access
Baez, Sandra, Couto, Blas, Torralva, Teresa, Sposato, Luciano A., Huepe, David, Montañes, Patricia, Reyes, Pablo, Matallana, Diana +4 more·2014·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Several clinical reports have stated that patients with prefrontal lesions or patients with the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia share social cognition impairments. Moral reasoning is impaired in both conditions but there have been few investigations that directly compare this domain in the 2 groups. OBSERVATIONS: This work compared the moral judgments of these patient groups using a task designed to disentangle the contributions of intentions and outcomes in moral judgment. For both disorders, patients judged scenarios where the protagonists believed that they would cause harm but did not as being more permissible than the control group. Moreover, patients with frontotemporal dementia judged harmful outcomes in the absence of harmful intentions as less permissible than the control participants. There were no differences between the 2 conditions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Both disorders involved impairments in integrating intention and outcome information for moral judgment. This study was the first, to our knowledge, to directly compare a social cognition domain in 2 frontal pathologies with different etiology. Our results highlighted the importance of comparing patients with vascular lesions and patients with neurodegenerative diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.347

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in processing of moral dimensions in bvFTD have been documented using verbal or pictorial scenarios describing moral situations followed by a moral judgement query.

    “Changes in processing of moral dimensions in bvFTD have been documented using verbal or pictorial scenarios describing moral situations followed by a moral judgement query (Mendez et al. , 2005; Baez et al. , 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Mesulam MM. Frontal cortex and behavior. Ann Neurol. 1986;19(4):320-325.
  2. Mendez MF, Anderson E, Shapira JS. An investigation of moral judgement in frontotemporal dementia. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2005;18(4):193-197.
  3. Young L, Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H, Hauser M, Damasio A. Damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex impairs judgment of harmful intent. Neuron. 2010;65(6):845-851.
  4. Ibañez A, Manes F. Contextual social cognition and the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2012;78(17):1354-1362.
  5. Rosen HJ, Gorno-Tempini ML, Goldman WP, et al. Patterns of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. Neurology. 2002;58(2):198-208.
  6. Brett M, Leff AP, Rorden C, Ashburner J. Spatial normalization of brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking. Neuroimage. 2001;14 (2):486-500.
  7. Baez S, Rattazzi A, Gonzalez-Gadea ML, et al. Integrating intention and context: assessing social cognition in adults with Asperger syndrome. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:302.
  8. Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH. Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(8): 1196-1208.
  9. Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH, Ryan K. Comparing a single case to a control sample: testing for neuropsychological deficits and dissociations in the presence of covariates. Cortex. 2011;47(10): 1166-1178.
  10. Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH, Porter S. Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010;27 (3):245-260.
  11. Koenigs M, Young L, Adolphs R, et al. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature. 2007;446(7138):908-911.
  12. Young L, Saxe R. The neural basis of belief encoding and integration in moral judgment. Neuroimage. 2008;40(4):1912-1920.
  13. Moran JM, Young LL, Saxe R, et al. Impaired theory of mind for moral judgment in high-functioning autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(7):2688-2692.
  14. Seeley WW, Crawford RK, Zhou J, Miller BL, Greicius MD. Neurodegenerative diseases target large-scale human brain networks. Neuron. 2009; 62(1):42-52.
  15. Lambon Ralph MA, Cipolotti L, Manes F, Patterson K. Taking both sides: do unilateral anterior temporal lobe lesions disrupt semantic memory? Brain. 2010;133(11):3243-3255.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baez, S., Couto, B., Torralva, T., Sposato, L. A., Huepe, D., Montañes, P., Reyes, P., Matallana, D., Vigliecca, N. S., Slachevsky, A., Manes, F., & Ibanez, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Institute of Neuroscience, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina2UDP-INECO Foundation Core on Neuroscience, Diego Portales University, Santiago, Chile3National Scientific and Technical Research Council, Buenos
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Favaloro University (AR)
  • Western University (CA)
  • Universidad Diego Portales (CL)
  • Universidad Javeriana, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Envejecimiento, Departamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Centro de Memoria y Cognición, Hospital San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia8Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia
  • Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (CO)
  • Hospital del Salvador (CL)
  • Australian Research Council (AU)
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2014-09-01
Volume
71
Issue
9
Pages
1172
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078651530
Cited by
93
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repositorio Institucional (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
moral judgment, frontotemporal dementia, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, social cognition, prefrontal lesions, vascular lesions, neurodegenerative diseases, moral reasoning
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Humans, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Morals, Social Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Stroke, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review