The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association of Autoimmune Encephalitis With Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Metastatic Cancer
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Paraneoplastic encephalitides usually precede a diagnosis of cancer and are often refractory to immunosuppressive therapy. Conversely, autoimmune encephalitides are reversible conditions that can occur in the presence or absence of cancer. OBJECTIVE: To report the induction of autoimmune encephalitis in 2 patients after treatment of metastatic cancer with a combination of the immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and ipilimumab. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective case study was conducted of the clinical and management course of 2 patients with progressive, treatment-refractory metastatic cancer who were treated with a single dose each (concomitantly) of the immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab, 1 mg/kg, and ipilimumab, 3 mg/kg. EXPOSURES: Nivolumab and ipilimumab. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The clinical response to immunosuppressive therapy in suspected autoimmune encephalitis in the setting of immune checkpoint inhibitor use. RESULTS: Autoantibody testing confirmed identification of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid of 1 patient. Withdrawal of immune checkpoint inhibitors and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy, consisting of intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate equivalent to 1000 mg of methylprednisolone for 5 days, 0.4 mg/kg/d of intravenous immunoglobulin for 5 days, and 2 doses of rituximab, 1000 mg, in 1 patient and oral prednisone, 60 mg/d, in the other patient, resulted in improved neurologic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Immune checkpoint inhibition may favor the development of immune responses against neuronal antigens, leading to autoimmune encephalitis. Early recognition and treatment of autoimmune encephalitis in patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade therapy will likely be essential for maximizing clinical recovery and minimizing the effect of drug-related toxic effects. The mechanisms by which immune checkpoint inhibition may contribute to autoimmune encephalitis require further study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies
Dalmau, J., Gleichman, A. J., Hughes, E. G., Rossi, J. E., Peng, X., Lai, M., Dessain, S. K., Rosenfeld, M. R., Balice-Gordon, R., & Lynch, D. R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70224-2 · Cited by 3,488
Self-citationTitulaer, M. J., McCracken, L., Gabilondo, I., Armangué, T., Glaser, C., Iizuka, T., Honig, L. S., Benseler, S. M., Kawachi, I., Martinez-Hernandez, E., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70310-1 · Cited by 3,165
Self-citationCellular and synaptic mechanisms of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis
Hughes, E. G., Peng, X., Gleichman, A. J., Lai, M., Zhou, L., Tsou, R., Parsons, T. D., Lynch, D. R., Dalmau, J., & Balice-Gordon, R. J. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0167-10.2010 · Cited by 1,143
Self-citation
Cited by
Brahmer, J. R., Lacchetti, C., Schneider, B. J., Atkins, M. B., Brassil, K. J., Caterino, J. M., Chau, I., Ernstoff, M. S., Gardner, J. M., Ginex, P., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.77.6385 · Cited by 3,713
Adverse effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: epidemiology, management and surveillance
Martins, F., Sofiya, L., Sykiotis, G. P., Lamine, F., Maillard, M., Fraga, M., Shabafrouz, K., Ribi, C., Cairoli, A., Guex-Crosier, Y., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-019-0218-0 · Cited by 2,314
Neurological adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Review of the literature
Cuzzubbo, S., Javeri, F., Tissier, M., Roumi, A., Barlog, C., Doridam, J., Lebbe, C., Belin, C., Ursu, R., & Carpentier, A. F. (2017) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.001 · Cited by 571
Thompson, J. A., Schneider, B. J., Brahmer, J., Andrews, S., Armand, P., Bhatia, S., Budde, L. E., Costa, L., Davies, M., Dunnington, D., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0013 · Cited by 570
Toi, Y., Sugawara, S., Sugisaka, J., Ono, H., Kawashima, Y., Aiba, T., Kawana, S., Saito, R., Aso, M., Tsurumi, K., et al. (2019) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5860 · Cited by 352
Toi, Y., Sugawara, S., Kawashima, Y., Aiba, T., Kawana, S., Saito, R., Tsurumi, K., Suzuki, K., Shimizu, H., Sugisaka, J., et al. (2018) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0384 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, T. J., Benavides, D. R., Patrice, K.-A., Dalmau, J. O., de Ávila, A. L. R., Le, D. T., Lipson, E. J., Probasco, J. C., & Mowry, E. M.
- Venue
- JAMA Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2016-08-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 928
- ISSN
- 2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2411407183
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 24.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
