Cited by 84Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNuclear Receptors and SignalingPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Association of Glycolysis-Enhancing α-1 Blockers With Risk of Developing Parkinson Disease

Open access
Simmering, Jacob E., Welsh, Michael J., Liu, Lei, Narayanan, Nandakumar S., Pottegård, Anton·2021·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

Importance: Parkinson disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease. A treatment that prevents or delays development of PD is a critical unmet need. Terazosin and closely related drugs were recently discovered to enhance glycolysis and reduce PD progression in animal models and human clinical databases. Objective: To determine whether use of terazosin, doxazosin, and alfuzosin is associated with a decreased risk of developing PD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used active comparator control and propensity score-matched data from Danish nationwide health registries, including the Danish National Prescription Registry, the Danish National Patient Registry, and the Danish Civil Registration System, from January 1996 to December 2017 and data from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan database from January 2001 to December 2017. Men without PD who newly initiated terazosin/doxazosin/alfuzosin therapy or tamsulosin therapy, which is used for a similar indication (benign prostatic hyperplasia or unspecified urinary problems) but does not enhance glycolysis, and had at least 1 year of follow-up after medication start were included. In Denmark, the database included all residents, while the Truven database is a compilation of insurance claims across the US. Data were analyzed from February 2019 to July 2020. Exposures: Patients who used terazosin/doxazosin/alfuzosin vs tamsulosin. Additional dose-response analyses were carried out. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in the hazard of developing PD identified by diagnoses or use of PD-specific medications between patients who ever used terazosin/doxazosin/alfuzosin or tamsulosin. Results: A cohort of 52 365 propensity score-matched pairs of terazosin/doxazosin/alfuzosin and tamsulosin users were identified in the Danish registries, of which all were male and the mean (SD) age was 67.9 (10.4) years, and 94 883 propensity score-matched pairs were identified in the Truven database, of which all were male and the mean (SD) age was 63.8 (11.1) years. Patients in the Danish cohort who used terazosin/doxazosin/alfuzosin had a hazard ratio (HR) for developing PD of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81-0.98), and patients in the Truven cohort had an HR of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.58-0.69). There was a dose-response association with short-duration, medium-duration, and long-duration use of terazosin/doxazosin/alfuzosin users having a decreasing HR in both the Danish cohort (short: HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.84-1.07; medium: HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.01; long: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95) and Truven cohort (short: HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.64-0.76; medium: HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.52-0.64; long: HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.57). Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that users of terazosin/doxazosin/alfuzosin are at lower hazard of developing PD compared with users of tamsulosin. Future work is needed to further assess this association.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5157

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. [1]Ascherio A, Schwarzschild MA. The epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease: risk factors and prevention. Lancet Neurol. 2016; 15(12): 1257- 1272. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30230-7 27751556 · DOI
  2. [3]Hirsch L, Jette N, Frolkis A, Steeves T, Pringsheim T. The incidence of Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology. 2016; 46(4): 292- 300. doi: 10.1159/000445751 27105081 · DOI
  3. [4]Burghaus L, Hilker R, Thiel A,. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus reversibly deteriorates stuttering in advanced Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2006; 113(5): 625- 631. doi: 10.1007/s00702-005-0341-1 16075183 · DOI
  4. [5]Hilker R, Portman AT, Voges J,. Disease progression continues in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease and effective subthalamic nucleus stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005; 76(9): 1217- 1221. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.057893 16107354 PMC1739814 · DOI
  5. [6]Verschuur CVM, Suwijn SR, Boel JA,; LEAP Study Group. Randomized delayed-start trial of levodopa in Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(4): 315- 324. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809983 30673543 · DOI
  6. [7]Biglan KM, Oakes D, Lang AE,; Parkinson Study Group STEADY‐PD III Investigators. A novel design of a phase III trial of isradipine in early Parkinson disease (STEADY-PD III). Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017; 4(6): 360- 368. doi: 10.1002/acn3.412 28589163 PMC5454402 · DOI
  7. [8]Kalia LV, Kalia SK, Lang AE. Disease-modifying strategies for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2015; 30(11): 1442- 1450. doi: 10.1002/mds.26354 26208210 · DOI
  8. [9]LeWitt PA. Levodopa therapy for Parkinson’s disease: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Mov Disord. 2015; 30(1): 64- 72. doi: 10.1002/mds.26082 25449210 · DOI
  9. [10]Saxena U. Bioenergetics failure in neurodegenerative diseases: back to the future. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2012; 16(4): 351- 354. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2012.664135 22339293 · DOI
  10. [11]Hoyer S. Brain glucose and energy metabolism during normal aging. Aging (Milano). 1990; 2(3): 245- 258. doi: 10.1007/BF03323925 1982730 · DOI
  11. [12]Cunnane S, Nugent S, Roy M,. Brain fuel metabolism, aging, and Alzheimer’s disease. Nutrition. 2011; 27(1): 3- 20. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2010.07.021 21035308 PMC3478067 · DOI
  12. [13]Firbank MJ, Yarnall AJ, Lawson RA,. Cerebral glucose metabolism and cognition in newly diagnosed Parkinson’s disease: ICICLE-PD study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017; 88(4): 310- 316. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-313918 28315844 · DOI
  13. [14]Hattingen E, Magerkurth J, Pilatus U,. Phosphorus and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy demonstrates mitochondrial dysfunction in early and advanced Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2009; 132(pt 12): 3285- 3297. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp293 19952056 · DOI
  14. [15]Schapira AH, Mann VM, Cooper JM,. Anatomic and disease specificity of NADH CoQ1 reductase (complex I) deficiency in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem. 1990; 55(6): 2142- 2145. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1990.tb05809.x 2121905 · DOI
  15. [16]Schapira AH, Cooper JM, Dexter D, Clark JB, Jenner P, Marsden CD. Mitochondrial complex I deficiency in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem. 1990; 54(3): 823- 827. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1990.tb02325.x 2154550 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [17]Pyle A, Anugrha H, Kurzawa-Akanbi M, Yarnall A, Burn D, Hudson G. Reduced mitochondrial DNA copy number is a biomarker of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2016; 38: 216.e7- 216.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.10.033 26639155 PMC4759605 · DOI
  17. [18]Blesa J, Phani S, Jackson-Lewis V, Przedborski S. Classic and new animal models of Parkinson’s disease. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012; 2012: 845618. doi: 10.1155/2012/845618 22536024 PMC3321500 · DOI
  18. [19]Schapira AH. Mitochondria in the aetiology and pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7(1): 97- 109. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70327-7 18093566 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [20]Schapira AH. Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurochem Res. 2008; 33(12): 2502- 2509. doi: 10.1007/s11064-008-9855-x 18998208 · DOI
  20. [21]Chen X, Zhao C, Li X,. Terazosin activates Pgk1 and Hsp90 to promote stress resistance. Nat Chem Biol. 2015; 11(1): 19- 25. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1657 25383758 PMC4412158 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [22]Cai R, Zhang Y, Simmering JE,. Enhancing glycolysis attenuates Parkinson’s disease progression in models and clinical databases. J Clin Invest. 2019; 129(10): 4539- 4549. doi: 10.1172/JCI129987 31524631 PMC6763248 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [23]Achari R, Laddu A. Terazosin: a new alpha adrenoceptor blocking drug. J Clin Pharmacol. 1992; 32(6): 520- 523. doi: 10.1177/009127009203200605 1353083 · DOI
  23. [24]de Groat WC, Yoshiyama M, Ramage AG, Yamamoto T, Somogyi GT. Modulation of voiding and storage reflexes by activation of α1-adrenoceptors. Eur Urol. 1999; 36(suppl 1): 68- 73. doi: 10.1159/000052324 10393477 · DOI
  24. [25]Pottegård A, Schmidt SAJ, Wallach-Kildemoes H, Sørensen HT, Hallas J, Schmidt M. Data resource profile: the Danish National Prescription registry. Int J Epidemiol. 2017; 46(3): 798- 798f. 27789670 PMC5837522
  25. [26]Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish National Patient registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 7: 449- 490. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S91125 26604824 PMC4655913 · DOI
  26. [27]Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014; 29(8): 541- 549. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3 24965263 · DOI
  27. [29]St Germaine-Smith C, Metcalfe A, Pringsheim T,. Recommendations for optimal ICD codes to study neurologic conditions: a systematic review. Neurology. 2012; 79(10): 1049- 1055. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182684707 22914826 PMC3430709 · DOI
  28. [30]Szumski NR, Cheng EM. Optimizing algorithms to identify Parkinson’s disease cases within an administrative database. Mov Disord. 2009; 24(1): 51- 56. doi: 10.1002/mds.22283 18816696 PMC2647991 · DOI
  29. [32]Stürmer T, Wyss R, Glynn RJ, Brookhart MA. Propensity scores for confounder adjustment when assessing the effects of medical interventions using nonexperimental study designs. J Intern Med. 2014; 275(6): 570- 580. doi: 10.1111/joim.12197 24520806 PMC4037382 · DOI
  30. [33]Surmeier DJ. Determinants of dopaminergic neuron loss in Parkinson’s disease. FEBS J. 2018; 285(19): 3657- 3668. doi: 10.1111/febs.14607 30028088 PMC6546423 · DOI
  31. [34]Spillantini MG, Crowther RA, Jakes R, Hasegawa M, Goedert M. alpha-Synuclein in filamentous inclusions of Lewy bodies from Parkinson’s disease and dementia with lewy bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(11): 6469- 6473. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6469 9600990 PMC27806 · DOI
  32. [35]Singleton AB, Farrer M, Johnson J,. alpha-Synuclein locus triplication causes Parkinson’s disease. Science. 2003; 302(5646): 841. doi: 10.1126/science.1090278 14593171 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [36]Patel A, Malinovska L, Saha S,. ATP as a biological hydrotrope. Science. 2017; 356(6339): 753- 756. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6846 28522535 · DOI
  34. [37]Hayes MH, Peuchen EH, Dovichi NJ, Weeks DL. Dual roles for ATP in the regulation of phase separated protein aggregates in Xenopus oocyte nucleoli. Elife. 2018; 7: 7. doi: 10.7554/eLife.35224 30015615 PMC6050040 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simmering, J. E., Welsh, M. J., Liu, L., Narayanan, N. S., & Pottegård, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Simmering, Jacob E.
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2021-04-01
Volume
78
Issue
4
Pages
407
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128588498
Cited by
84
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002537)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS100849)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES005605)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, terazosin, doxazosin, alfuzosin, tamsulosin, alpha-1 adrenergic blockers, disease risk reduction, drug repurposing, benign prostatic hyperplasia, dose-response relationship, neurodegeneration prevention, drug safety and efficacy, propensity score matching, pharmacoepidemiology
MeSH terms
Tamsulosin, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Denmark, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycolysis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Prazosin, Quinazolines, Registries, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Databases, Factual, Doxazosin, Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review