Cited by 60Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Detection of Brain Tau Pathology in Down Syndrome Using Plasma Biomarkers

Open access
Janelidze, Shorena, Christian, Bradley T., Price, Julie, Laymon, Charles, Schupf, Nicole, Klunk, William E., Lott, Ira, Silverman, Wayne +7 more·2022·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

Importance: Novel plasma biomarkers, especially phosphorylated tau (p-tau), can detect brain tau aggregates in Alzheimer disease. Objective: To determine which plasma biomarker combinations can accurately detect tau pathological brain changes in Down syndrome (DS). Design, Setting, and Participants: The cross-sectional, multicenter Alzheimer's Biomarker Consortium-Down Syndrome study included adults with DS and a control group of siblings without DS. All participants with plasma, positron emission tomography (PET), and cognitive measures available by the time of data freeze 1.0 were included. Participants were enrolled between 2016 and 2019, and data were analyzed from August 2021 to April 2022. Exposures: Plasma p-tau217, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), amyloid β42/40 (Aβ42/Aβ40), neurofilament light (NfL), and total tau (t-tau); tau positron emission tomography (tau-PET) and Aβ-PET. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was tau-PET status. Secondary outcomes included Aβ-PET status and cognitive performance. Results: Among 300 participants with DS and a control group of 37 non-DS siblings, mean (SD) age was 45.0 (10.1) years, and 167 (49.6%) were men. Among participants with DS who all underwent plasma p-tau217 and GFAP analyses, 258 had other plasma biomarker data available and 119, 213, and 288 participants had tau-PET, Aβ-PET, and cognitive assessments, respectively. Plasma p-tau217 and t-tau were significantly increased in Aβ-PET-positive tau-PET-positive (A+T+) DS and A+T- DS compared with A-T- DS while GFAP was only increased in A+T+ DS. Plasma p-tau217 levels were also significantly higher in A+T+ DS than A+T- DS. In participants with DS, plasma p-tau217 and GFAP (but not other plasma biomarkers) were consistently associated with abnormal tau-PET and Aβ-PET status in models covaried for age (odds ratio range, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.05-2.40] to 2.32 [95% CI, 1.36-3.96]; P < .03). A combination of p-tau217 and age performed best when detecting tau-PET abnormality in temporal and neocortical regions (area under the curve [AUC] range, 0.96-0.99). The most parsimonious model for Aβ-PET status included p-tau217, t-tau, and age (AUC range, 0.93-0.95). In multivariable models, higher p-tau217 levels but not other biomarkers were associated with worse performance on DS Mental Status Examination (β, -0.24, 95% CI, -0.36 to -0.12; P < .001) and Cued Recall Test (β, -0.40; 95% CI, -0.53 to -0.26; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Plasma p-tau217 is a very accurate blood-based biomarker of both tau and Aβ pathological brain changes in DS that could help guide screening and enrichment strategies for inclusion of individuals with DS in future AD clinical trials, especially when it is combined with age as a covariate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1740

Cites

41 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This relationship is observed across the AD continuum, including the asymptomatic phase in sporadic and genetic forms of AD.

    “This relationship is observed across the AD continuum, including the asymptomatic phase in sporadic and genetic forms of AD.11,12,13,14”

    From Diagnostic Accuracy of a Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 Immunoassay for Alzheimer Disease Pathology (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results (Plasma Biomarkers by Diagnostic Groups and PET Status; page not specified) report biomarker differences in cognitively stable participants with Down syndrome, supporting an observation before cognitive symptoms in a genetic form of AD. The Introduction discusses related findings in sporadic AD, but this study does not establish that the same relationship is observed across the full AD continuum, including the asymptomatic phase of sporadic AD. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janelidze, S., Christian, B. T., Price, J., Laymon, C., Schupf, N., Klunk, W. E., Lott, I., Silverman, W., Rosas, H. D., Zaman, S., Mapstone, M., Lai, F., Ances, B. M., Handen, B. L., & Hansson, O.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
  • Janelidze, Shorena
  • Handen, Benjamin L.
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2022-08-01
Volume
79
Issue
8
Pages
797
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283826849
Cited by
60
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2016-00906)
  • Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond
  • National Institute on Aging (U01AG051406, U19AG068054, P30AG062715, U24AG021886)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Down syndrome, tau pathology, phosphorylated tau, plasma biomarkers, tau PET, amyloid PET, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament light chain, amyloid-beta, total tau, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive performance, combined biomarker detection
MeSH terms
Adult, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Positron-Emission Tomography, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review