The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Initiative
Abstract
A major challenge in value-based health care is the lack of standardized health outcomes measurements, hindering optimal monitoring and comparison of the quality of health care across different settings globally. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) assembled a multidisciplinary international working group, comprised of 26 health care providers and patient advocates, to develop a standard set of value-based patient-centered outcomes for breast cancer (BC). The working group convened via 8 teleconferences and completed a follow-up survey after each meeting. A modified 2-round Delphi method was used to achieve consensus on the outcomes and case-mix variables to be included. Patient focus group meetings (8 early or metastatic BC patients) and online anonymized surveys of 1225 multinational BC patients and survivors were also conducted to obtain patients' input. The standard set encompasses survival and cancer control, and disutility of care (eg, acute treatment complications) outcomes, to be collected through administrative data and/or clinical records. A combination of multiple patient-reported outcomes measurement (PROM) tools is recommended to capture long-term degree of health outcomes. Selected case-mix factors were recommended to be collected at baseline. The ICHOM will endeavor to achieve wide buy-in of this set and facilitate its implementation in routine clinical practice in various settings and institutions worldwide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005
Porter, M. E. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1011024 · Cited by 5,084
Basch, E., Deal, A. M., Kris, M. G., Scher, H. I., Hudis, C. A., Sabbatini, P., Rogak, L., Bennett, A. V., Dueck, A. C., Atkinson, T. M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.0830 · Cited by 2,593
Sprangers, M. A., Groenvold, M., Arraras, J. I., Franklin, J., te Velde, A., Muller, M., Franzini, L., Williams, A., de Haes, H. C., Hopwood, P., et al. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1996.14.10.2756 · Cited by 1,220
ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)
Cardoso, F., Costa, A., Norton, L., Senkus, E., Aapro, M., André, F., Barrios, C. H., Bergh, J., Biganzoli, L., Blackwell, K. L., et al. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu385 · Cited by 540
Self-citationDi Maio, M., Gallo, C., Leighl, N. B., Piccirillo, M. C., Daniele, G., Nuzzo, F., Gridelli, C., Gebbia, V., Ciardiello, F., De Placido, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.57.9334 · Cited by 497
Cited by
Integration of oncology and palliative care: a Lancet Oncology Commission
Kaasa, S., Loge, J. H., Aapro, M., Albreht, T., Anderson, R., Bruera, E., Brunelli, C., Caraceni, A., Cervantes, A., Currow, D. C., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30415-7 · Cited by 830
Nolte, S., Liegl, G., Petersen, M. A., Aaronson, N. K., Costantini, A., Fayers, P. M., Groenvold, M., Holzner, B., Johnson, C. D., Kemmler, G., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.024 · Cited by 462
Doherty, M., Miller-Sonet, E., Gardner, D., & Epstein, I. (2019) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347332.2018.1504851 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Ong, W. L., Schouwenburg, M. G., van Bommel, A. C. M., Stowell, C., Allison, K. H., Benn, K. E., Browne, J. P., Cooter, R. D., Delaney, G. P., Duhoux, F. P., Ganz, P. A., Hancock, P., Jagsi, R., Knaul, F. M., Knip, A. M., Koppert, L. B., Kuerer, H. M., McLaughin, S., Mureau, M. A. M., Partridge, A. H., Reid, D. P., Sheeran, L., Smith, T. J., Stoutjesdijk, M. J., Vrancken Peeters, M. J. T. F. D., Wengström, Y., Yip, C.-H., & Saunders, C.
- Venue
- JAMA Oncology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-05-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 677
- ISSN
- 2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2565247902
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 54.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Initiative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4851
- The paper
- Ong, W. L., Schouwenburg, M. G., van Bommel, A. C. M., Stowell, C., Allison, K. H., Benn, K. E., Browne, J. P., Cooter, R. D., Delaney, G. P., Duhoux, F. P., Ganz, P. A., Hancock, P., Jagsi, R., Knaul, F. M., Knip, A. M., Koppert, L. B., Kuerer, H. M., McLaughin, S., Mureau, M. A. M., . . . Saunders, C. (2017). A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Initiative. JAMA Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4851
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
