The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: The incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are thought to be rising, but updated epidemiologic data are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To explore the evolving epidemiology and investigate the effect of therapeutic advances on survival of patients with NETs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective, population-based study using nationally representative data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program was conducted to evaluate 64 971 patients with NETs from 1973 to 2012. Associated population data were used to determine annual age-adjusted incidence, limited-duration prevalence, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates. Trends in survival from 2000 to 2012 were evaluated for the entire cohort as well as specific subgroups, including distant-stage gastrointestinal NETs and pancreatic NETs. Analyses were conducted between December 2015, and February 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Neuroendocrine tumor incidence, prevalence, and OS rates. RESULTS: Of the 64 971 cases of NETs, 34 233 (52.7%) were women. The age-adjusted incidence rate increased 6.4-fold from 1973 (1.09 per 100 000) to 2012 (6.98 per 100 000). This increase occurred across all sites, stages, and grades. In the SEER 18 registry grouping (2000-2012), the highest incidence rates were 1.49 per 100 000 in the lung, 3.56 per 100 000 in gastroenteropancreatic sites, and 0.84 per 100 000 in NETs with an unknown primary site. The estimated 20-year limited-duration prevalence of NETs in the United States on January 1, 2014, was 171 321. On multivariable analyses, the median 5-year OS rate varied significantly by stage, grade, age at diagnosis, primary site, and time period of diagnosis. The OS rate for all NETs improved from the 2000-2004 period to the 2009-2012 period (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.85). Even larger increases in OS between these periods were noted in distant-stage gastrointestinal NETs (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.62-0.81) and distant-stage pancreatic NETs (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44-0.70). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The incidence and prevalence of NETs are steadily rising, possibly owing to detection of early-stage disease and stage migration. Survival for all NETs has improved over time, especially for distant-stage gastrointestinal NETs and pancreatic NETs in particular, reflecting improvement in therapies. These data will help to prioritize future research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Cited by
177 Lu-DOTATATE for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
Das, S., Al-Toubah, T., El-Haddad, G., & Strosberg, J. (2019) · Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1080/17474124.2019.1685381 · Cited by 135
“Article highlights ● 177Lu-DOTATATE is a radiolabeled somatostatin agonist (SSA), which is approved for the treatment of somatostatin receptor positive welldifferentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients in Europe, the United States, and Canada.”
BackgroundBaum, R. P., Zhang, J., Schuchardt, C., Müller, D., & Mäcke, H. (2021) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.120.258889 · Cited by 127
Shi, M., Jakobsson, V., Greifenstein, L., Khong, P.-L., Chen, X., Baum, R. P., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.1034315 · Cited by 68
Therapeutic strategies for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: current perspectives
Modica, R., Liccardi, A., Minotta, R., Cannavale, G., Benevento, E., & Colao, A. (2022) · Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1080/17446651.2022.2099840 · Cited by 37
Loharkar, S., & Basu, S. (2023) · Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development · doi:10.1080/23808993.2023.2211090 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Dasari, A., Shen, C., Halperin, D., Zhao, B., Zhou, S., Xu, Y., Shih, T., & Yao, J. C.
- Venue
- JAMA Oncology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-10-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1335
- ISSN
- 2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2608160487
- Cited by
- 3,447
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 164.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.