The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Biomarker Analyses of Atezolizumab Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase 1 Study
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Atezolizumab (anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 [PD-L1]) is well tolerated and clinically active in multiple cancer types. Its safety and clinical activity in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) has not been reported. Objective: To evaluate the safety, clinical activity, and biomarkers associated with the use of single-agent atezolizumab in patients with mTNBC. Design, Setting, and Participants: Women with mTNBC (defined by investigator assessment) were enrolled between January 2013 and February 2016 in a multicohort open-label, phase 1 study at US and European academic medical centers. Median follow-up was 25.3 months (range, 0.4-45.6 months). Eligible patients regardless of line of therapy had measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1; and a representative tumor sample for assessment of immune cell (IC) PD-L1 expression. Interventions: Atezolizumab was given intravenously every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxic effects or loss of clinical benefit. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was safety and tolerability. Activity and exploratory outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were assessed in all patients and in key patient subgroups. Results: Among 116 evaluable patients (median age, 53 years [range, 29-82 years]), treatment-related adverse events occurred in 73 (63%); 58 (79%) were grade 1 to 2. Most adverse events occurred within the first treatment year. The ORRs were numerically higher in first-line (5 of 21 [24%]) than in second-line or greater patients (6 of 94 [6%]). Median duration of response was 21 months (range, 3 to ≥38 months). Median PFS was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.3-1.6) months by RECIST and 1.9 (95% CI, 1.4-2.5) months by irRC. In first-line patients, median OS was 17.6 months (95% CI, 10.2 months to not estimable). Patients with PD-L1 expression of at least 1% tumor-infiltrating ICs had higher ORRs and longer OS (12% [11 of 91]; 10.1 [95% CI, 7.0-13.8] months, respectively) than those with less than 1% ICs (0 of 21; 6.0 [95% CI, 2.6-12.6] months, respectively). High levels of ICs (>10%) were independently associated with higher ORRs and longer OS. Conclusions and Relevance: Single-agent atezolizumab was well tolerated and provided durable clinical benefit in patients with mTNBC with stable or responding disease and in earlier lines of treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01375842.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle.
Chen, D. S., & Mellman, I. (2013) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.012 · Cited by 6,929
Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients
Herbst, R. S., Soria, J.-C., Kowanetz, M., Fine, G. D., Hamid, O., Gordon, M. S., Sosman, J. A., McDermott, D. F., Powderly, J. D., Gettinger, S. N., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14011 · Cited by 5,231
Self-citationFehrenbacher, L., Spira, A., Ballinger, M., Kowanetz, M., Vansteenkiste, J., Mazieres, J., Park, K., Smith, D., Artal-Cortes, A., Lewanski, C., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00587-0 · Cited by 2,756
Self-citationBalar, A. V., Galsky, M. D., Rosenberg, J. E., Powles, T., Petrylak, D. P., Bellmunt, J., Loriot, Y., Necchi, A., Hoffman-Censits, J., Perez-Gracia, J. L., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32455-2 · Cited by 2,199
Inhibitory B7-family molecules in the tumour microenvironment
Zou, W., & Chen, L. (2008) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2326 · Cited by 1,608
Baseline Biomarkers for Outcome of Melanoma Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab
Weide, B., Martens, A., Hassel, J. C., Berking, C., Postow, M. A., Bisschop, K., Simeone, E., Mangana, J., Schilling, B., Di Giacomo, A. M., et al. (2016) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0127 · Cited by 589
Vinayak, S., Tolaney, S. M., Schwartzberg, L. S., Mita, M. M., McCann, G. A.-L., Tan, A. R., Wahner Hendrickson, A. E., Forero-Torres, A., Anders, C. K., Wulf, G. M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.1011 · Cited by 77 · cited 2×
“(%) [95% CI] 5 (24) [8-47] 10 (11) [5-19] 0 [0-17] 15 (16) [10-26]”
Self-citation
Cited by
Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer
Schmid, P., Adams, S., Rugo, H. S., Schneeweiss, A., Barrios, C. H., Iwata, H., Diéras, V., Hegg, R., Im, S.-A., Shaw Wright, G., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1809615 · Cited by 4,350
Self-citationTreatment landscape of triple-negative breast cancer — expanded options, evolving needs
Bianchini, G., De Angelis, C., Licata, L., & Gianni, L. (2022) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00565-2 · Cited by 1,382
Schmid, P., Rugo, H. S., Adams, S., Schneeweiss, A., Barrios, C. H., Iwata, H., Diéras, V., Henschel, V., Molinero, L., Chui, S. Y., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30689-8 · Cited by 1,216
Self-citationRecent advances in therapeutic strategies for triple-negative breast cancer
Li, Y., Zhang, H., Merkher, Y., Chen, L., Liu, N., Leonov, S., & Chen, Y. (2022) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-022-01341-0 · Cited by 956
Adams, S., Schmid, P., Rugo, H. S., Winer, E. P., Loirat, D., Awada, A., Cescon, D. W., Iwata, H., Campone, M., Nanda, R., et al. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy517 · Cited by 807
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Emens, L. A., Cruz, C., Eder, J. P., Braiteh, F., Chung, C., Tolaney, S. M., Kuter, I., Nanda, R., Cassier, P. A., Delord, J.-P., Gordon, M. S., ElGabry, E., Chang, C.-W., Sarkar, I., Grossman, W., O’Hear, C., Fassò, M., Molinero, L., & Schmid, P.
- Venue
- JAMA Oncology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-01-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74
- ISSN
- 2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889746019
- Cited by
- 766
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 27.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Biomarker Analyses of Atezolizumab Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase 1 Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4224
- The paper
- Emens, L. A., Cruz, C., Eder, J. P., Braiteh, F., Chung, C., Tolaney, S. M., Kuter, I., Nanda, R., Cassier, P. A., Delord, J.-P., Gordon, M. S., ElGabry, E., Chang, C.-W., Sarkar, I., Grossman, W., O’Hear, C., Fassò, M., Molinero, L., & Schmid, P. (2019). Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Biomarker Analyses of Atezolizumab Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase 1 Study. JAMA Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.