Cited by 589Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

Baseline Biomarkers for Outcome of Melanoma Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: Biomarkers for outcome after immune-checkpoint blockade are strongly needed as these may influence individual treatment selection or sequence. We aimed to identify baseline factors associated with overall survival (OS) after pembrolizumab treatment in melanoma patients. Experimental Design: Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), routine blood count parameters, and clinical characteristics were investigated in 616 patients. Endpoints were OS and best overall response following pembrolizumab treatment. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression were applied for survival analysis. Results: Relative eosinophil count (REC) ≥1.5%, relative lymphocyte count (RLC) ≥17.5%, ≤2.5-fold elevation of LDH, and the absence of metastasis other than soft-tissue/lung were associated with favorable OS in the discovery (n = 177) and the confirmation (n = 182) cohort and had independent positive impact (all P < 0.001). Their independent role was subsequently confirmed in the validation cohort (n = 257; all P < 0.01). The number of favorable factors was strongly associated with prognosis. One-year OS probabilities of 83.9% versus 14.7% and response rates of 58.3% versus 3.3% were observed in patients with four of four compared to those with none of four favorable baseline factors present, respectively. Conclusions: High REC and RLC, low LDH, and absence of metastasis other than soft-tissue/lung are independent baseline characteristics associated with favorable OS of patients with melanoma treated with pembrolizumab. Presence of four favorable factors in combination identifies a subgroup with excellent prognosis. In contrast, patients with no favorable factors present have a poor prognosis, despite pembrolizumab, and additional treatment advances are still needed. A potential predictive impact needs to be further investigated. Clin Cancer Res; 22(22); 5487–96. ©2016 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0127

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weide, B., Martens, A., Hassel, J. C., Berking, C., Postow, M. A., Bisschop, K., Simeone, E., Mangana, J., Schilling, B., Di Giacomo, A. M., Brenner, N., Kähler, K., Heinzerling, L., Gutzmer, R., Bender, A., Gebhardt, C., Romano, E., Meier, F., Martus, P., Maio, M., Blank, C., Schadendorf, D., Dummer, R., Ascierto, P. A., Hospers, G., Garbe, C., & Wolchok, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
  • 10Department of Dermatology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • 12Division of Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • University Hospital Cologne (DE)
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Institut Curie (FR)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Siena (IT)
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Weide, Benjamin
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2016-11-14
Volume
22
Issue
22
Pages
5487-5496
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2397854274
Cited by
589
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 14
FWCI
39.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
melanoma, pembrolizumab, immune checkpoint blockade, prognostic factors, overall survival, lactate dehydrogenase, eosinophil count, lymphocyte count, metastasis, best overall response, predictive biomarkers
MeSH terms
Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Female, Humans, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Male, Melanoma, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Skin Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Cohort Studies, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review