Analysis of the Prevalence of Microsatellite Instability in Prostate Cancer and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: The anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody pembrolizumab is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) solid tumors, but the prevalence of MSI-H/dMMR prostate cancer and the clinical utility of immune checkpoint blockade in this disease subset are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To define the prevalence of MSI-H/dMMR prostate cancer and the clinical benefit of anti-PD-1/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy in this molecularly defined population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this case series, 1551 tumors from 1346 patients with prostate cancer undergoing treatment at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were prospectively analyzed using a targeted sequencing assay from January 1, 2015, through January 31, 2018. Patients had a diagnosis of prostate cancer and consented to tumor molecular profiling when a tumor biopsy was planned or archival tissue was available. For each patient, clinical outcomes were reported, with follow-up until May 31, 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Tumor mutation burden and MSIsensor score, a quantitative measure of MSI, were calculated. Mutational signature analysis and immunohistochemistry for MMR protein expression were performed in select cases. RESULTS: Among the 1033 patients who had adequate tumor quality for MSIsensor analysis (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [9.3] years), 32 (3.1%) had MSI-H/dMMR prostate cancer. Twenty-three of 1033 patients (2.2%) had tumors with high MSIsensor scores, and an additional 9 had indeterminate scores with evidence of dMMR. Seven of the 32 MSI-H/dMMR patients (21.9%) had a pathogenic germline mutation in a Lynch syndrome-associated gene. Six patients had more than 1 tumor analyzed, 2 of whom displayed an acquired MSI-H phenotype later in their disease course. Eleven patients with MSI-H/dMMR castration-resistant prostate cancer received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Six of these (54.5%) had a greater than 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen levels, 4 of whom had radiographic responses. As of May 2018, 5 of the 6 responders (5 of 11 total [45.5%]) were still on therapy for as long as 89 weeks. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The MSI-H/dMMR molecular phenotype is uncommon yet therapeutically meaningful in prostate cancer and can be somatically acquired during disease evolution. Given the potential for durable responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, these findings support the use of prospective tumor sequencing to screen all patients with advanced prostate cancer for MSI-H/dMMR. Because not all patients with the MSI-H/dMMR phenotype respond, further studies should explore mechanisms of resistance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a retrospective case series of 11 patients with MSI-H/dMMR CRPC receiving anti-PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 therapy, 6 (54.5%) patients had a ≥50% PSA decline, and 4 (36.4%) demonstrated radiographic responses.
“In a retrospective case series of 11 patients with MSI-H/dMMR CRPC receiving anti-PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 therapy, 6 (54.5%) patients had a ≥50% PSA decline, and 4 (36.4%) demonstrated radiographic responses [68].”
From Navigating therapeutic sequencing in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patient journey (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
With the exception of PD-1 blockade in patients with mCRPC harboring MSI-H/dMMR or TMB-H tumors, PD-1 blockade in PC has provided limited survival benefit.
“With the exception of PD-1 blockade in patients with mCRPC harboring MSI-H/dMMR or TMB-H tumors, PD-1 blockade in PC has provided limited survival benefit, and ongoing strategies to understand immune evasion and increase the effectiveness of checkpoint blockade in mCRPC are needed [31, 68].”
From Navigating therapeutic sequencing in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patient journey (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Cites
Integrative Clinical Genomics of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Robinson, D., Van Allen, E. M., Wu, Y.-M., Schultz, N., Lonigro, R. J., Mosquera, J.-M., Montgomery, B., Taplin, M.-E., Pritchard, C. C., Attard, G., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.001 · Cited by 3,645 · see citing works
Self-citationZehir, A., Benayed, R., Shah, R. H., Syed, A., Middha, S., Kim, H. R., Srinivasan, P., Gao, J., Chakravarty, D., Devlin, S. M., et al. (2017) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4333 · Cited by 3,380 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Parker, C., Castro, E., Fizazi, K., Heidenreich, A., Ost, P., Procopio, G., Tombal, B., & Gillessen, S. (2020) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.011 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
Microsatellite instability: a review of what the oncologist should know
Li, K., Luo, H., Huang, L., Luo, H., & Zhu, X. (2020) · Cancer Cell International · doi:10.1186/s12935-019-1091-8 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Sharma, P., Pachynski, R. K., Narayan, V., Fléchon, A., Gravis, G., Galsky, M. D., Mahammedi, H., Patnaik, A., Subudhi, S. K., Ciprotti, M., et al. (2020) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.08.007 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Current and future perspectives of PD-1/PDL-1 blockade in cancer immunotherapy
Makuku, R., Khalili, N., Razi, S., Keshavarz-Fathi, M., & Rezaei, N. (2021) · Journal of Immunology Research · doi:10.1155/2021/6661406 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
The role of biomarkers in personalized immunotherapy
Sankar, K., Ye, J. C., Li, Z., Zheng, L., Song, W., & Hu-Lieskovan, S. (2022) · Biomarker Research · doi:10.1186/s40364-022-00378-0 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Annala, M., Fu, S., Bacon, J. V. W., Sipola, J., Iqbal, N., Ferrario, C., Ong, M., Wadhwa, D., Hotte, S. J., Lo, G., et al. (2021) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.205 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
McManus, H. D., Dorff, T., Morgans, A. K., Sartor, O., Shore, N., & Armstrong, A. J. (2025) · Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases · doi:10.1038/s41391-024-00906-z · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“%) demonstrated radiographic responses [68].”
Influential
- Authors
- Abida, W., Cheng, M. L., Armenia, J., Middha, S., Autio, K. A., Vargas, H. A., Rathkopf, D., Morris, M. J., Danila, D. C., Slovin, S. F., Carbone, E., Barnett, E. S., Hullings, M., Hechtman, J. F., Zehir, A., Shia, J., Jonsson, P., Stadler, Z. K., Srinivasan, P., Laudone, V. P., Reuter, V., Wolchok, J. D., Socci, N. D., Taylor, B. S., Berger, M. F., Kantoff, P. W., Sawyers, C. L., Schultz, N., Solit, D. B., Gopalan, A., & Scher, H. I.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Abida, Wassim
- ORCID
- Abida, Wassim
- Cheng, Michael L.
- Armenia, Joshua
- Middha, Sumit
- Autio, Karen A.
- Vargas, Hebert Alberto
- Rathkopf, Dana
- Morris, Michael J.
- Danila, Daniel C.
- Slovin, Susan F.
- Carbone, Emily
- Hechtman, Jaclyn F.
- Zehir, Ahmet
- Shia, Jinru
- Jonsson, Philip
- Stadler, Zsofia K.
- Srinivasan, Preethi
- Laudone, Vincent P.
- Reuter, Victor
- Wolchok, Jedd D.
- Socci, Nicholas D.
- Taylor, Barry S.
- Berger, Michael F.
- Kantoff, Philip W.
- Sawyers, Charles L.
- Schultz, Nikolaus
- Solit, David B.
- Gopalan, Anuradha
- Scher, Howard I.
- Venue
- JAMA Oncology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-04-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 471
- ISSN
- 2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6459218
- OpenAlex
- W2908503672
- Cited by
- 667
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 23.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense
- Prostate Cancer Foundation (P30 CA008748)
- Amgen
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Pfizer
- Sanofi
- Celgene
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
- Array BioPharma
- Endocyte
- BioMarin Pharmaceutical
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- New England Research Institutes
- Clovis Oncology
- Tizona Therapeutics
- Foghorn Therapeutics
- Agios Pharmaceuticals
- Adaptive Biotechnologies
- BeiGene
- Tarveda Therapeutics
- Syndax Pharmaceuticals
- Alimera Sciences
- Ascentage Pharma
- Astellas Pharma
- Ono Pharmaceutical
- National Institutes of Health (5u54ca224079-04)
- Genentech
- Allergan
- Chugai Pharmaceutical
- Loxo Oncology
- Spark Therapeutics
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology
- National Cancer Institute (U54-CA224079, R01CA155169, P30CA008748, P50CA092629)
- Janssen Biotech
- DOD Prostate Cancer Research Program
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
- Keywords
- microsatellite instability, mismatch repair deficiency, prostate cancer, pembrolizumab, immune checkpoint blockade, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, castration-resistant prostate cancer, Lynch syndrome, germline mutations, tumor mutational burden, mutational signatures, PSA response, treatment response prediction, targeted sequencing, immunohistochemistry
- MeSH terms
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Phenotype, Prostatic Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Microsatellite Instability, DNA Mismatch Repair, B7-H1 Antigen, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review