Cited by 49Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsBone health and treatmentsChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research

Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance for Prevention of Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma in Patients With High-risk Smoldering Myeloma: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Kazandjian, Dickran, Hill, Elizabeth, Dew, Alexander, Morrison, Candis, Roswarski, Joseph, Korde, Neha, Emanuel, Michael, Petrosyan, Ani +26 more·2021·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: High-risk smoldering myeloma has a 5-year risk of progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma of approximately 75%. Treatment with lenalidomide decreases the risk of progression; however, novel triplet regimens are superior, and earlier disease may be more treatment sensitive. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) with lenalidomide maintenance therapy as early intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma and to determine the rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response (CR). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this single-arm, single-center, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial, responses were evaluated at every cycle during KRd treatment and every 3 cycles subsequently. Bone marrow biopsies and imaging were performed by cycle 8 and then annually. The study enrolled patients from May 29, 2012, to July 23, 2020, at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, a highly specialized tertiary cancer center. Patient key eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of high-risk smoldering myeloma based on the Mayo Clinic, Spanish, and/or Rajkumar, Mateos, and Landgren criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received eight 4-week cycles of intravenous carfilzomib 36 mg/m2 (first 2 doses, 20 mg/m2), dexamethasone (20 mg, cycles 1-4; 10 mg, cycles 5-8 twice weekly), and lenalidomide 25 mg (days 1-21) followed by twenty-four 28-day cycles of maintenance lenalidomide 10 mg (days 1-21). Stem cell harvest and storage were optional. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the MRD-negative CR rate. Key secondary outcomes included duration of MRD-negative CR and progression to multiple myeloma. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients (median age, 59 years [range, 40-79 years]; 30 men [55.6%]; and 2 Asian [3.7%], 15 Black [27.8%], 1 Hispanic [1.9%], and 36 White [66.7%] patients) were enrolled, with a median potential follow-up time of 31.9 months (range, 6.7-102.9 months). The MRD-negative CR rate was 70.4% (95% CI, 56.4%-82.0%), with a median sustained duration of 5.5 years (95% CI, 3.7 years to not estimable). The 8-year probability of being free from progression to multiple myeloma was 91.2% (95% CI, 67.4%-97.9%), and no deaths occurred. Nonhematologic grade 3 adverse events occurred in 21 patients (38.9%) and included thromboembolism, rash, and lung infection, with no grade 4 events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of this phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that treatment of high-risk smoldering myeloma with novel triplet regimens, such as KRd and lenalidomide maintenance therapy, may alter the natural history of smoldering myeloma by significantly delaying development of end-organ disease. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm this favorable benefit-to-risk profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01572480.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3971

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These third-group patients are well captured by integrating independent disease-burden-based prognostic scores (e.g., IMWG and PETHEMA).

    “Typically, these patients are well captured by integrating independent disease-burden-based prognostic scores (e.g., IMWG and PETHEMA).7,102,103”

    From Evolution of Multiple Myeloma from a Genomic Perspective (2026) · cites this paper as [103]

    The Strengths and Limitations section (page unavailable) says the authors used mutually inclusive criteria to define high-risk smoldering myeloma and that current risk models use disease-burden variables. It does not establish that integrating IMWG and PETHEMA scores captures these patients well; it instead notes substantial discordance between risk models. The paper uses IMWG criteria for myeloma-defining events, rather than identifying an IMWG prognostic score in that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood. 2009;113(22): 5412-5417. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-12-194241 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Landgren O, Hofmann JN, McShane CM, et al. Association of immune marker changes with progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to multiple myeloma. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(9):1293-1301. doi:10.1001/ jamaoncol.2019.1568 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Kyle RA, Remstein ED, Therneau TM, et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(25):2582-2590. doi:10.1056/ NEJMoa070389 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Dispenzieri A, Kyle RA, Katzmann JA, et al. Immunoglobulin free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008;111(2):785-789. doi:10.1182/blood- 2007-08-108357 · DOI
  5. Lakshman A, Rajkumar SV, Buadi FK, et al. Risk stratification of smoldering multiple myeloma incorporating revised IMWG diagnostic criteria. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8(6):59. doi:10.1038/s41408- 018-0077-4 · DOI
  6. Pérez-Persona E, Vidriales MB, Mateo G, et al. New criteria to identify risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smoldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells. Blood. 2007;110(7):2586-2592. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-05-088443 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Rajkumar SV, Landgren O, Mateos MV. Smoldering multiple myeloma. Blood. 2015;125(20): 3069-3075. doi:10.1182/blood-2014-09-568899 · DOI
  8. Hill E, Dew A, Kazandjian D. State of the science in smoldering myeloma: should we be treating in the clinic? Semin Oncol. 2019;46(2):112-120. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.03.001 · DOI
  9. Lonial S, Jacobus S, Fonseca R, et al. Randomized trial of lenalidomide versus observation in smoldering multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(11):1126-1137. doi:10.1200/ JCO.19.01740 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Stewart AK, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, et al; ASPIRE Investigators. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(2):142- 152. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411321 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kazandjian D, Korde N, Mailankody S, et al. Remission and progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone: five-year follow-up of a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(12):1781-1783. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5457 · DOI
  12. Korde N, Roschewski M, Zingone A, et al. Treatment with carfilzomib-lenalidomide- dexamethasone with lenalidomide extension in patients with smoldering or newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(6):746-754. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2010 · DOI
  13. Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538-e548. doi:10.1016/ S1470-2045(14)70442-5 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):e328-e346. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(16) 30206-6 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Roshal M, Flores-Montero JA, Gao Q, et al. MRD detection in multiple myeloma: comparison between MSKCC 10-color single-tube and EuroFlow 8-color 2-tube methods. Blood Adv. 2017;1(12):728- 732. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2016003715 · DOI
  16. Mateos MV, Kumar S, Dimopoulos MA, et al. International Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Blood Cancer J. 2020;10(10):102. doi:10.1038/s41408-020-00366-3 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Durie BGM, Hoering A, Sexton R, et al. Longer term follow-up of the randomized phase III trial SWOG S0777: bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone vs lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients (pts) with previously untreated multiple myeloma without an intent for immediate autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Blood Cancer J. 2020;10(5):53. doi:10.1038/ s41408-020-0311-8 · DOI
  18. Lomas OC, Ghobrial IM. Clinical controversies in the management of smoldering multiple myeloma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020;40(40):1-6. doi:10.1200/EDBK_278911 · DOI
  19. Mateos MV, Martinez-Lopez J, Rodriguez Otero P, et al. Curative strategy (GEM-CESAR) for high-risk smoldering myeloma (SMM): carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd) as induction followed by HDT-ASCT, consolidation with Krd and maintenance with Rd. Blood. 2019;134(suppl 1):781. doi:10.1182/ blood-2019-125204 · DOI
  20. Kumar SK, Abdallah AO, Badros AZ, et al. Aggressive smoldering curative approach evaluating novel therapies (ASCENT): a phase 2 trial of induction, consolidation and maintenance in subjects with high risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM): initial analysis of safety data. Blood. 2020;136(suppl 1):35-36. doi:10.1182/blood- 2020-142584 · DOI
  21. Hill E, Dew A, Morrison C, et al. Assessment of discordance among smoldering multiple myeloma risk models. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(1):132-134. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5585 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Maura F, Bolli N, Rustad EH, Hultcrantz M, Munshi N, Landgren O. Moving from cancer burden to cancer genomics for smoldering myeloma: a review. JAMA Oncology. 2020;6(3):425-432. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4659 · DOI
  23. Boyle EM, Deshpande S, Tytarenko R, et al. The molecular make up of smoldering myeloma highlights the evolutionary pathways leading to multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):293. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20524-2 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Oben B, Froyen G, Maclachlan KH, et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals progressive versus stable myeloma precursor conditions as two distinct entities. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1861. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22140-0 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kazandjian, D., Hill, E., Dew, A., Morrison, C., Roswarski, J., Korde, N., Emanuel, M., Petrosyan, A., Bhutani, M., Calvo, K. R., Dulau-Florea, A., Kwok, M., Lee, M.-J., Lee, S., Lindenberg, L., Mailankody, S., Manasanch, E., Maric, I., Mena, E., Patel, N., Tageja, N., Trepel, J. B., Turkbey, B., Wang, H.-W., Wang, W., Yuan, C., Zhang, Y., Braylan, R., Choyke, P., Stetler-Stevenson, M., Steinberg, S. M., Figg, W. D., Roschewski, M., & Landgren, O.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Hematology Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Corresponding author
Kazandjian, Dickran
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2021-11-01
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
1678
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3200999481
Cited by
49
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Celgene
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Keywords
carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, KRd, high-risk smoldering myeloma, lenalidomide maintenance, progression to multiple myeloma, minimal residual disease, progression-free survival
MeSH terms
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma, Lenalidomide, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dexamethasone, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Oligopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review