The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy of Preoperative mFOLFIRINOX vs mFOLFIRINOX Plus Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Borderline Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas: The A021501 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
Importance: National guidelines endorse treatment with neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but the optimal strategy remains unclear. Objective: To compare treatment with neoadjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) with or without hypofractionated radiation therapy with historical data and establish standards for therapy in borderline resectable PDAC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multicenter, randomized phase 2 clinical trial conducted from February 2017 to January 2019 among member institutions of National Clinical Trials Network cooperative groups used standardized quality control measures and included 126 patients, of whom 70 (55.6%) were registered to arm 1 (systemic therapy; 54 randomized, 16 following closure of arm 2 at interim analysis) and 56 (44.4%) to arm 2 (systemic therapy and sequential hypofractionated radiotherapy; all randomized before closure). Data were analyzed by the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center during September 2021. Interventions: Arm 1: 8 treatment cycles of mFOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m 2 ; irinotecan, 180 mg/m 2 ; leucovorin, 400 mg/m 2 ; and infusional fluorouracil, 2400 mg/m 2 ) over 46 hours, administered every 2 weeks. Arm 2: 7 treatment cycles of mFOLFIRINOX followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (33-40 Gy in 5 fractions) or hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy (25 Gy in 5 fractions). Patients without disease progression underwent pancreatectomy, which was followed by 4 cycles of treatment with postoperative FOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m 2 ; leucovorin, 400 mg/m 2 ; bolus fluorouracil, 400 mg/m 2 ; and infusional fluorouracil, 2400 mg/m 2 over 46 hours). Main Outcomes and Measures: Each treatment arm’s 18-month overall survival (OS) rate was compared with a historical control rate of 50%. A planned interim analysis mandated closure of either arm for which 11 or fewer of the first 30 accrued patients underwent margin-negative (R0) resection. Results: Of 126 patients, 62 (49%) were women, and the median (range) age was 64 (37-83) years. Among the first 30 evaluable patients enrolled to each arm, 17 patients in arm 1 (57%) and 10 patients in arm 2 (33%) had undergone R0 resection, leading to closure of arm 2 but continuation to full enrollment in arm 1. The 18-month OS rate of evaluable patients was 66.7% (95% CI, 56.1%-79.4%) in arm 1 and 47.3% (95% CI 35.8%-62.5%) in arm 2. The median OS of evaluable patients in arm 1 and arm 2 was 29.8 (95% CI, 21.1-36.6) months and 17.1 (95% CI, 12.8-24.4) months, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that treatment with neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX alone was associated with favorable OS in patients with borderline resectable PDAC compared with mFOLFIRINOX treatment plus hypofractionated radiotherapy; thus, mFOLFIRINOX represents a reference regimen in this setting. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02839343
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Self-citationThe National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Present and future directions
McGivney, W. T. (1998) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10+<2057::aid-cncr14>3.0.co;2-a · Cited by 16,766
Edge, S. B., & Compton, C. C. (2010) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4 · Cited by 9,029
Egner, J. R. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1525 · Cited by 5,997
Acute Abdomen: A Rare Case of Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Gloor, S., Jensen, K. O., Breitenstein, S., Binkert, C. A., Angst, E., & Hetzer, F. H. (2017) · Case Reports in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1159/000463378 · Cited by 5,370
Versteijne, E., Suker, M., Groothuis, K., Akkermans-Vogelaar, J. M., Besselink, M. G., Bonsing, B. A., Buijsen, J., Busch, O. R., Creemers, G.-J. M., van Dam, R. M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.02274 · Cited by 1,082
Callery, M. P., Chang, K. J., Fishman, E. K., Talamonti, M. S., William Traverso, L., & Linehan, D. C. (2009) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0408-6 · Cited by 902
Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Definitions, Management, and Role of Preoperative Therapy
Varadhachary, G. R., Tamm, E. P., Abbruzzese, J. L., Xiong, H. Q., Crane, C. H., Wang, H., Lee, J. E., Pisters, P. W. T., Evans, D. B., & Wolff, R. A. (2006) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/aso.2006.08.011 · Cited by 876
Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The Importance of This Emerging Stage of Disease
Katz, M. H. G., Pisters, P. W. T., Evans, D. B., Sun, C. C., Lee, J. E., Fleming, J. B., Vauthey, N. J., Abdalla, E. K., Crane, C. H., Wolff, R. A., et al. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.020 · Cited by 827
Self-citation
Cited by
Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer
Springfeld, C., Ferrone, C. R., Katz, M. H. G., Philip, P. A., Hong, T. S., Hackert, T., Büchler, M. W., & Neoptolemos, J. (2023) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-023-00746-1 · Cited by 377
Self-citationGPT-4 for Information Retrieval and Comparison of Medical Oncology Guidelines
Ferber, D., Wiest, I. C., Wölflein, G., Ebert, M. P., Beutel, G., Eckardt, J.-N., Truhn, D., Springfeld, C., Jäger, D., & Kather, J. N. (2024) · NEJM AI · doi:10.1056/aics2300235 · Cited by 92
de Scordilli, M., Michelotti, A., Zara, D., Palmero, L., Alberti, M., Noto, C., Totaro, F., Foltran, L., Guardascione, M., Iacono, D., et al. (2023) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104013 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Katz, M. H. G., Shi, Q., Meyers, J., Herman, J. M., Chuong, M., Wolpin, B. M., Ahmad, S., Marsh, R., Schwartz, L., Behr, S., Frankel, W. L., Collisson, E., Leenstra, J., Williams, T. M., Vaccaro, G., Venook, A., Meyerhardt, J. A., & O’Reilly, E. M.
- Venue
- JAMA Oncology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2022-09-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1263
- ISSN
- 2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4285390129
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 22.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of Preoperative mFOLFIRINOX vs mFOLFIRINOX Plus Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Borderline Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas: The A021501 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2319
- The paper
- Katz, M. H. G., Shi, Q., Meyers, J., Herman, J. M., Chuong, M., Wolpin, B. M., Ahmad, S., Marsh, R., Schwartz, L., Behr, S., Frankel, W. L., Collisson, E., Leenstra, J., Williams, T. M., Vaccaro, G., Venook, A., Meyerhardt, J. A., & O’Reilly, E. M. (2022). Efficacy of Preoperative mFOLFIRINOX vs mFOLFIRINOX Plus Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Borderline Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas: The A021501 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.