Cited by 167Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Critical Appraisal of Guideline Recommendations on Systemic Therapies for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review

Open access
Cappuyns, Sarah, Corbett, Virginia, Yarchoan, Mark, Finn, Richard S., Llovet, Josep M.·2024·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

Importance: The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with antiangiogenic agents has revolutionized the treatment landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, due to rapid publication of new studies that attained their predefined primary end points, a lack of robust cross-trial comparison of first-line therapies, and diverging clinical guidelines, no clear-cut treatment flowchart and sequence of therapies are available. This critical analysis of the recommendations for the management of advanced HCC from the main scientific societies in the US and Europe adopted an integrated approach to provide information on the clinical benefit (overall survival and progression-free survival) and safety profile of these therapies using the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)–Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) score and an ad hoc network meta-analysis. Observations: There is a major consensus among guidelines that atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has a primacy as the recommended first-line treatment of choice in advanced HCC. On progression after immunotherapy-containing regimens and for patients with contraindications for immunotherapies, most guidelines maintain the established treatment hierarchy, recommending lenvatinib or sorafenib as the preferred options, followed by either regorafenib, cabozantinib, or ramucirumab. Thus far, the first-line immune-based regimen of tremelimumab plus durvalumab has been integrated only in the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidance document and the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and has particular utility for patients with a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Overall, in the first-line setting, both atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sintilimab plus IBI305 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) and durvalumab plus tremelimumab received the highest ESMO-MCBS score of 5, indicating a substantial magnitude of clinical benefit. In a network meta-analysis, no significant differences in overall survival were found among the various combination regimens. However, the newly reported combination of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib was associated with a significantly higher risk of treatment-related adverse events compared with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (relative risk, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.25-2.03; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This narrative review found that atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is regarded as the primary standard of care for advanced HCC in the first-line setting. These findings from integrating the recommendations from scientific societies’ guidelines for managing advanced HCC along with new data from cross-trial comparisons may aid clinicians in decision-making and guide them through a rapidly evolving and complex treatment landscape.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2677

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effective systemic therapies, especially immune-checkpoint inhibitors, have substantially improved outcomes for patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

    “Over the past two decades, the development of effective systemic therapies has substantially improved the outcomes of patients with advanced-stage HCC2–6.”
  • Approval of numerous new systemic agents for advanced HCC has left substantial knowledge gaps about optimal first-line regimen choice and sequencing after progression.

    “the approval of numerous new systemic agents for advanced-stage HCC has left substantial knowledge gaps in choosing the optimal first-line regimen and the subsequent sequencing of these agents after disease progression6.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Genentech. Genentech's Tecentriq plus avastin is the first treatment combination to reduce the risk of cancer returning in people with certain types of early-stage liver cancer in a phase III trial. Press release. January 18, 2023. Accessed February 16, 2023. https://www.gene.com/media/ press-releases/14981/2023-01-18/genentechs-tecentriq-plus-avastin-is-the

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cappuyns, S., Corbett, V., Yarchoan, M., Finn, R. S., & Llovet, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Tisch Cancer Institute (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2024-03-01
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
395
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385514156
Cited by
167
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 3
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Belgian American Educational Foundation
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Exelixis
  • Incyte
  • Seagen
  • Cancer Research UK (C9380/A268-13, A26813, 26813)
  • Fundación Científica Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (C9380/A26813)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (SGR‐1358, PID2019)
  • Eisai
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2019, PID2019-105378RB-I00)
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (A26813, C9380/A26813)
  • Vlaamse regering
  • Ipsen
  • National Institutes of Health (RO1DK56621)
  • Genentech
  • Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (SGR-1358)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA062924, R01CA285544)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R56DK056621, R01DK056621, R01DK128289)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, systemic therapy, first-line therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, lenvatinib, sorafenib, regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab, angiogenesis inhibitors
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Sorafenib, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Immunotherapy, Liver Neoplasms, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review