Cited by 134Intraocular Surgery and LensesHealthcare Policy and ManagementOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

Geographic variation in the rate and timing of cataract surgery among US communities

Open access
Kauh, Courtney Y., Blachley, Taylor S., Lichter, Paul R., Lee, Paul P., Stein, Joshua D.·2016·JAMA Ophthalmology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Previous studies using data from the 1980s found relatively little geographic variation in cataract surgery rates across the United States. We do not know whether similar patterns hold true today, nor do we know the patient- and community-level factors that might explain any recent geographic variations in the rate and timing of cataract surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of geographic variation in patient age at initial cataract surgery and the age-standardized cataract surgery rate in a large group of insured US patients with cataracts. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cross-sectional study of 1 050 815 beneficiaries older than 40 years of age with cataracts who were enrolled in a nationwide managed-care network during the period from 2001 to 2011. The data analysis was started in 2014 and refined in 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Median age at initial cataract extraction, age-standardized cataract surgery rate, and time from initial diagnosis to first surgery for patients with cataracts were compared among 306 US communities. Multivariable regression modeling generated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs identifying factors associated with patients' likelihood of undergoing cataract surgery. RESULTS: A total of 243 104 patients with cataracts (23.1%) underwent 1 or more surgical procedures (55.1% were female patients). Communities with the youngest and oldest patients at initial surgery differed in age by nearly 20 years (59.9-60.1 years in Lansing, Michigan, and Aurora, Illinois, vs 77.0-79.6 years in Marquette, Michigan; Rochester, New York; and Binghamton, New York). The highest age-standardized cataract surgery rate (37.3% in Lake Charles, Louisiana) was 5-fold higher than the lowest (7.5% in Honolulu, Hawaii). The median time from initial cataract diagnosis to date of first surgery ranged from 17 days (Victoria, Texas) to 367 days (Yakima, Washington). Compared with white patients, black patients had a 15% decreased hazard of surgery (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.83-0.87]), while Latino patients (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.05-1.10]) and Asian patients (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.05-1.12]) had an increased hazard. For every 1° higher latitude, the hazard of surgery decreased by 1% (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-0.99]). For every additional optometrist per 100 000 enrollees in a community, the hazard of surgery increased 0.1% (HR, 1.001 [95% CI, 1.001-1.001]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In recent years, patient age at first cataract surgery and the age-standardized surgery rate have varied considerably among some US communities. Future research should explore the extent to which such variations may affect patient outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.5322

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With 3.8 million cataract procedures performed every year in the United States, medications potentially totaling $560 million are needlessly discarded.

    “With 3.8 million cataract procedures performed every year in the United States, medications potentially totaling $560 million are needlessly discarded.76,77”

    From How Ophthalmologists Can Decarbonize Eye Care (2023) · cites this paper as [77]

    The Results report cataract surgeries among enrollees in a managed-care network, not an annual US total. Searches for 3.8 million procedures and $560 million in discarded medications found no passage addressing either figure or medication waste; the cited paper cannot verify this claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Rothman KJ Greenland S Lash TL Modern Epidemiology 3 Philadelphia, PA Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kauh, C. Y., Blachley, T. S., Lichter, P. R., Lee, P. P., & Stein, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Stein, Joshua D.
Venue
JAMA Ophthalmology
Published
2016-03-01
Volume
134
Issue
3
Pages
267
ISSN
2168-6165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2221645771
Cited by
134
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Research to Prevent Blindness (1K23EY019511)
  • W.K. Kellogg Foundation
  • National Eye Institute (K23EY019511)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Keywords
cataract surgery, regional variation, age at surgery, time to surgery, cataract diagnosis, racial disparities, Hispanic patients, managed care, Medicare beneficiaries, health care utilization, community factors, insurance status, urban-rural differences, quality of care
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cataract, Cataract Extraction, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethnicity, Female, Geography, Humans, Male, Managed Care Programs, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, United States, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review