The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual Impairment and Blindness in Adults in the United States: Demographic and Geographic Variations From 2015 to 2050
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: The number of individuals with visual impairment (VI) and blindness is increasing in the United States and around the globe as a result of shifting demographics and aging populations. Tracking the number and characteristics of individuals with VI and blindness is especially important given the negative effect of these conditions on physical and mental health. OBJECTIVES: To determine the demographic and geographic variations in VI and blindness in adults in the US population in 2015 and to estimate the projected prevalence through 2050. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this population-based, cross-sectional study, data were pooled from adults 40 years and older from 6 major population-based studies on VI and blindness in the United States. Prevalence of VI and blindness were reported by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and per capita prevalence by state using the US Census projections (January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2050). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence of VI and blindness. RESULTS: In 2015, a total of 1.02 million people were blind, and approximately 3.22 million people in the United States had VI (best-corrected visual acuity in the better-seeing eye), whereas up to 8.2 million people had VI due to uncorrected refractive error. By 2050, the numbers of these conditions are projected to double to approximately 2.01 million people with blindness, 6.95 million people with VI, and 16.4 million with VI due to uncorrected refractive error. The highest numbers of these conditions in 2015 were among non-Hispanic white individuals (2.28 million), women (1.84 million), and older adults (1.61 million), and these groups will remain the most affected through 2050. However, African American individuals experience the highest prevalence of visual impairment and blindness. By 2050, the highest prevalence of VI among minorities will shift from African American individuals (15.2% in 2015 to 16.3% in 2050) to Hispanic individuals (9.9% in 2015 to 20.3% in 2050). From 2015 to 2050, the states projected to have the highest per capita prevalence of VI are Florida (2.56% in 2015 to 3.98% in 2050) and Hawaii (2.35% in 2015 and 3.93% in 2050), and the states projected to have the highest projected per capita prevalence of blindness are Mississippi (0.83% in 2015 to 1.25% in 2050) and Louisiana (0.79% in 2015 to 1.20% in 2050). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These data suggest that vision screening for refractive error and early eye disease may reduce or prevent a high proportion of individuals from experiencing unnecessary vision loss and blindness, decrease associated costs to the US economy for medical services and lost productivity, and contribute to better quality of life. Targeted education and screening programs for non-Hispanic white women and minorities should become increasingly important because of the projected growth of these populations and their relative contribution to the overall numbers of these conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Causes and Prevalence of Visual Impairment Among Adults in the UnitedStates
(2004) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.122.4.477 · Cited by 2,616
Prevalence of Open-Angle Glaucoma Among Adults in the United States
(2004) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.122.4.532 · Cited by 1,110
Racial Differences in the Cause-Specific Prevalence of Blindness in East Baltimore
Sommer, A., Tielsch, J. M., Katz, J., Quigley, H. A., Gottsch, J. D., Javitt, J. C., Martone, J. F., Royall, R. M., Witt, K. A., & Ezrine, S. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199111143252004 · Cited by 764
Important Causes of Visual Impairment in the World Today
Congdon, N. G. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.15.2057 · Cited by 698
The Beaver Dam Eye Study: Visual Acuity
Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., Linton, K. L. P., & De Mets, D. L. (1991) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32137-7 · Cited by 663
The Economic Burden of Major Adult Visual Disorders in the United States
Rein, D. B. (2006) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.124.12.1754 · Cited by 635
Blindness and Visual Impairment in an American Urban Population: The Baltimore Eye Survey
Tielsch, J. M. (1990) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1990.01070040138048 · Cited by 608
Crews, J. E., & Campbell, V. A. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.5.823 · Cited by 587
Global Prevalence of Vision Impairment and Blindness
Stevens, G. A., White, R. A., Flaxman, S. R., Price, H., Jonas, J. B., Keeffe, J., Leasher, J., Naidoo, K., Pesudovs, K., Resnikoff, S., et al. (2013) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.025 · Cited by 510
Prevalence of Visual Impairment in the United States
Vitale, S., Cotch, M. F., & Sperduto, R. D. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.18.2158 · Cited by 376
Cited by
An augmented reality sign-reading assistant for users with reduced vision
Huang, J., Kinateder, M., Dunn, M. J., Jarosz, W., Yang, X.-D., & Cooper, E. A. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210630 · Cited by 75
Understanding the Power of Control in Autonomous Vehicles for People with Vision Impairment
Brewer, R. N., & Kameswaran, V. (2018) · Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3234695.3236347 · Cited by 72
Low vision and the risk of dementia: a nationwide population-based cohort study
Paik, J.-S., Ha, M., Jung, Y. H., Kim, G.-H., Han, K.-D., Kim, H.-S., Lim, D. H., & Na, K.-S. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66002-z · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Varma, R., Vajaranant, T. S., Burkemper, B., Wu, S., Torres, M., Hsu, C., Choudhury, F., & McKean-Cowdin, R.
- Venue
- JAMA Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2016-07-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 802
- ISSN
- 2168-6165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2402693112
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 20.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual Impairment and Blindness in Adults in the United States: Demographic and Geographic Variations From 2015 to 2050. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1284
- The paper
- Varma, R., Vajaranant, T. S., Burkemper, B., Wu, S., Torres, M., Hsu, C., Choudhury, F., & McKean-Cowdin, R. (2016). Visual Impairment and Blindness in Adults in the United States: Demographic and Geographic Variations From 2015 to 2050. JAMA Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1284
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.