Cited by 34Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeRetinal Imaging and Analysis

Lifetime outcomes of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Open access
Finger, Robert P., Puth, Marie-Therese, Schmid, Matthias, Barthelmes, Daniel, Guymer, Robyn H., Gillies, Mark·2020·JAMA Ophthalmology

Abstract

Importance: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), the largest single cause of irreversible severe vision loss in high-income countries, can now be treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, but to our knowledge, no data on lifetime outcomes are available. Objective: To determine visual acuity (VA) outcomes of anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD in both eyes for patients' remaining lifetime. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multistate modeling using real-world cohort data of 3192 patients with nAMD (>67 000 visits) treated in routine eye clinics in Australia, New Zealand, and Switzerland. Data were analyzed between 2007 and 2015. Exposures: Intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment at the treating physician's discretion and prospective data collection in standardized registry. Main Outcomes and Measures: Visual acuity in both eyes over the remaining lifetime. Results: For the mean remaining lifetime of 11 years, an estimated 12% (n = 371; 95% CI, 345-400) of the sample retained driving VA and an estimated 15% (n = 463; 95% CI, 434-495) reading VA in at least 1 eye. At that time, an estimated 82% of the sample (n = 2629; 95% CI, 2590-2660) had dropped out. Younger age at baseline and more injections during the first year of treatment were associated with better long-term outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Anti-VEGF treatment was associated with preserved useful visual acuity in almost 20% of patients over their average remaining lifetime. More than 80% of patients will cease treatment over that time, having likely experienced a deterioration of vision beforehand. This is a remarkable outcome compared with outcomes without intervention, which lead to legal blindness within 3 years of disease onset in 80% of those affected. These findings underline the public health necessity of providing anti-VEGF treatment to persons in need.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3989

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current nAMD therapeutic paradigm comes with a tremendous treatment burden of repeated intravitreal injections for the lifetime of the patient.

    “The current nAMD therapeutic paradigm comes with a tremendous treatment burden of repeated intravitreal injections for the lifetime of the patient.6,24”

    From Safety and efficacy of ixoberogene soroparvovec in neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the United States (OPTIC): a prospective, two-year, multicentre phase 1 study (2024) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Abstract describes regular intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and says treatment is long term, often continuing until it is no longer beneficial or the patient dies. But the Discussion reports that more than 80% of patients are no longer being treated toward the end of their remaining life expectancy, so the source does not support injections continuing for every patient’s lifetime. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finger, R. P., Puth, M.-T., Schmid, M., Barthelmes, D., Guymer, R. H., & Gillies, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Finger, Robert P.
Venue
JAMA Ophthalmology
Published
2020-12-01
Volume
138
Issue
12
Pages
1234
ISSN
2168-6165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092667339
Cited by
34
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
neovascular age-related macular degeneration, anti-VEGF therapy, visual acuity, remaining lifetime, treatment discontinuation, legal blindness, intravitreal injection, age at baseline, multi-state models
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Automobile Driving, Female, Humans, Male, Markov Chains, Middle Aged, Reading, Retrospective Studies, Visual Acuity, Treatment Outcome, Choroidal Neovascularization, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Wet Macular Degeneration, Intravitreal Injections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review