The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progression of Myopia in School-Aged Children After COVID-19 Home Confinement
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Time spent in outdoor activities has decreased owing to home confinement for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Concerns have been raised about whether home confinement may have worsened the burden of myopia owing to substantially decreased time spent outdoors and increased screen time at home. Objective: To investigate the refractive changes and prevalence of myopia in school-aged children during the COVID-19 home confinement. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cross-sectional study using school-based photoscreenings in 123 535 children aged 6 to 13 years from 10 elementary schools in Feicheng, China, was conducted. The study was performed during 6 consecutive years (2015-2020). Data were analyzed in July 2020. Exposures: Noncycloplegic photorefraction was examined using a photoscreener device. Main Outcomes and Measures: The spherical equivalent refraction was recorded for each child and the prevalence of myopia for each age group during each year was calculated. The mean spherical equivalent refraction and prevalence of myopia were compared between 2020 (after home confinement) and the previous 5 years for each age group. Results: Of the 123 535 children included in the study, 64 335 (52.1%) were boys. A total of 194 904 test results (389 808 eyes) were included in the analysis. A substantial myopic shift (approximately -0.3 diopters [D]) was found in the 2020 school-based photoscreenings compared with previous years (2015-2019) for younger children aged 6 (-0.32 D), 7 (-0.28 D), and 8 (-0.29 D) years. The prevalence of myopia in the 2020 photoscreenings was higher than the highest prevalence of myopia within 2015-2019 for children aged 6 (21.5% vs 5.7%), 7 (26.2% vs 16.2%), and 8 (37.2% vs 27.7%) years. The differences in spherical equivalent refraction and the prevalence of myopia between 2020 and previous years were minimal in children aged 9 to 13 years. Conclusions and Relevance: Home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic appeared to be associated with a significant myopic shift for children aged 6 to 8 years according to 2020 school-based photoscreenings. However, numerous limitations warrant caution in the interpretation of these associations, including use of noncycloplegic refractions and lack of orthokeratology history or ocular biometry data. Younger children's refractive status may be more sensitive to environmental changes than older ages, given the younger children are in a critical period for the development of myopia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cook, R. J., Dickens, B. M., & Fathalla, M. F. (2003) · Reproductive Health and Human Rights · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199241323.003.0025 · Cited by 10,769
Mitigate the effects of home confinement on children during the COVID-19 outbreak
Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., Zhang, J., & Jiang, F. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30547-x · Cited by 2,148
Self-citationMorgan, I. G., Ohno-Matsui, K., & Saw, S.-M. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60272-4 · Cited by 1,871
He, M., Xiang, F., Zeng, Y., Mai, J., Chen, Q., Zhang, J., Smith, W., Rose, K., & Morgan, I. G. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.10803 · Cited by 1,076
Research Commentary —Too Big to Fail: Large Samples and the p -Value Problem
Lin, M., Lucas, H. C., & Shmueli, G. (2013) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0480 · Cited by 972
Axial length growth and the risk of developing myopia in European children
Tideman, J. W. L., Polling, J. R., Vingerling, J. R., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Williams, C., Guggenheim, J. A., & Klaver, C. C. W. (2018) · Acta Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1111/aos.13603 · Cited by 348
Ocular Component Data in Schoolchildren as a Function of Age and Gender
Zadnik, K., Manny, R. E., Yu, J. A., Mitchell, G. L., Cotter, S. A., Quiralte, J. C., Shipp, M. D., Friedman, N. E., Kleinstein, R. N., Walker, T. W., et al. (2003) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.2003.tb01623.x · Cited by 253
Hyman, L. (2005) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.123.7.977 · Cited by 250
Dayan, Y. B., Levin, A., Morad, Y., et al. (2005) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0260 · Cited by 207
Cited by
The COVID-19 pandemic and its potential enduring impact on children
Irwin, M., Lazarevic, B., Soled, D., & Adesman, A. (2022) · Current Opinion in Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/mop.0000000000001097 · Cited by 72
“4–3-fold increase in the prevalence of myopia in children 6–8 years of age [16].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., Li, Y., Musch, D. C., Wei, N., Qi, X., Ding, G., Li, X., Li, J., Song, L., Zhang, Y., Ning, Y., Zeng, X., Hua, N., Li, S., & Qian, X.
- Venue
- JAMA Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2021-03-01
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 293
- ISSN
- 2168-6165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3119326312
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 62.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progression of Myopia in School-Aged Children After COVID-19 Home Confinement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.6239
- The paper
- Wang, J., Li, Y., Musch, D. C., Wei, N., Qi, X., Ding, G., Li, X., Li, J., Song, L., Zhang, Y., Ning, Y., Zeng, X., Hua, N., Li, S., & Qian, X. (2021). Progression of Myopia in School-Aged Children After COVID-19 Home Confinement. JAMA Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.6239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.