Cited by 972Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods and Applications

Research Commentary —Too Big to Fail: Large Samples and the p -Value Problem

Lin, Mingfeng, Lucas, Henry C., Shmueli, Galit·2013·Information Systems Research

Abstract

The Internet has provided IS researchers with the opportunity to conduct studies with extremely large samples, frequently well over 10,000 observations. There are many advantages to large samples, but researchers using statistical inference must be aware of the p-value problem associated with them. In very large samples, p-values go quickly to zero, and solely relying on p-values can lead the researcher to claim support for results of no practical significance. In a survey of large sample IS research, we found that a significant number of papers rely on a low p-value and the sign of a regression coefficient alone to support their hypotheses. This research commentary recommends a series of actions the researcher can take to mitigate the p-value problem in large samples and illustrates them with an example of over 300,000 camera sales on eBay. We believe that addressing the p-value problem will increase the credibility of large sample IS research as well as provide more insights for readers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.2013.0480

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Owing to the very large sample sizes, P values were not calculated since they can be very small even if differences between cohorts are of no clinical significance.

    “Owing to the very large sample sizes in this study, P values were not calculated since they can be very small even if differences between cohorts are of no clinical significance.49”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, M., Lucas, H. C., & Shmueli, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Srini Raju Centre for IT & the Networked Economy, Indian School of Business, Hyderabad 500 032, India
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
2013-12
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
906-917
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W1991208598
Cited by
972
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
48.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Eprints Services at ISB (DESI) (Indian School of Business) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Eprints Services at ISB (DESI) (Indian School of Business) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of South Florida
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
large sample size, statistical significance, practical significance, hypothesis testing, regression coefficients, research credibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review