The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relationship Between Parent Attitudes About Childhood Vaccines Survey Scores and Future Child Immunization Status: A Validation Study
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Acceptance of childhood vaccinations is waning, amplifying interest in developing and testing interventions that address parental barriers to immunization acceptance. OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive validity and test-retest reliability of the Parent Attitudes About Childhood Vaccines survey (PACV), a recently developed measure of vaccine hesitancy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort of English-speaking parents of children aged 2 months and born from July 10 through December 10, 2010, who belonged to an integrated health care delivery system based in Seattle and who returned a completed baseline PACV. Parents who completed a follow-up survey 8 weeks later were included in the reliability analysis. Parents who remained continuous members in the delivery system until their child was 19 months old were included in the validity analysis. EXPOSURE: The PACV, scored on a scale of 0 to 100 (100 indicates high vaccine hesitancy). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Child's immunization status as measured by the percentage of days underimmunized from birth to 19 months of age. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-seven parents completed the baseline PACV (response rate, 50.5%), and 220 (66.5%) completed the follow-up survey. Of the 437 parents who completed a baseline survey, 310 (70.9%) maintained continuous enrollment. Compared with parents who scored less than 50, parents who scored 50 to 69 on the survey had children who were underimmunized for 8.3% (95% CI, 3.6%-12.8%) more days from birth to 19 months of age; those who scored 70 to 100, 46.8% (40.3%-53.3%) more days. Baseline and 8-week follow-up PACV scores were highly concordant (ρ = 0.844). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Scores on the PACV predict childhood immunization status and have high reliability. Our results should be validated in different geographic and demographic samples of parents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.
Lin, L. I.-K. (1989) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532051 · Cited by 8,785
Goyder, J., & de Vaus, D. A. (1987) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3340954 · Cited by 2,269
Presser, S., Rossi, P. H., Wright, J. D., & Anderson, A. B. (1985) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578982 · Cited by 921
Parents With Doubts About Vaccines: Which Vaccines and Reasons Why
Gust, D. A., Darling, N., Kennedy, A., & Schwartz, B. (2008) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0538 · Cited by 611
Parental vaccine safety concerns in 2009
Freed, G. L., Clark, S. J., Butchart, A. T., Singer, D. C., & Davis, M. M. (2010) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-1962 · Cited by 503
Children Who Have Received No Vaccines: Who Are They and Where Do They Live?
Smith, P. J., Chu, S. Y., & Barker, L. E. (2004) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.114.1.187 · Cited by 435
Opel, D. J., Mangione-Smith, R., Taylor, J. A., Korfiatis, C., Wiese, C., Catz, S., & Martin, D. P. (2011) · Human Vaccines · doi:10.4161/hv.7.4.14120 · Cited by 432
Self-citationValidity and reliability of a survey to identify vaccine-hesitant parents
Opel, D. J., Taylor, J. A., Mangione-Smith, R., Solomon, C., Zhao, C., Catz, S., & Martin, D. (2011) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.115 · Cited by 409
Self-citationConfidence About Vaccines In The United States: Understanding Parents’ Perceptions
Kennedy, A., LaVail, K., Nowak, G., Basket, M., & Landry, S. (2011) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0396 · Cited by 384
Smith, P. J., Kennedy, A. M., Wooten, K., Gust, D. A., & Pickering, L. K. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-0923 · Cited by 378
Cited by
Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action
Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Rothman, A. J., Leask, J., & Kempe, A. (2017) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618760521 · Cited by 1,233
de Figueiredo, A., Simas, C., Karafillakis, E., Paterson, P., & Larson, H. J. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31558-0 · Cited by 1,143
Voo, J. Y. H., Lean, Q. Y., Ming, L. C., Md. Hanafiah, N. H., Al-Worafi, Y. M., & Ibrahim, B. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9111348 · Cited by 380
Vaccine Hesitancy: Clarifying a Theoretical Framework for an Ambiguous Notion
Peretti-Watel, P., Ward, J. K., Schulz, W. S., Verger, P., & Larson, H. J. (2015) · PLoS Currents · doi:10.1371/currents.outbreaks.6844c80ff9f5b273f34c91f71b7fc289 · Cited by 343
Comparisons of Vaccine Hesitancy across Five Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Wagner, A. L., Masters, N. B., Domek, G. J., Mathew, J. L., Sun, X., Asturias, E. J., Ren, J., Huang, Z., Contreras-Roldan, I. L., Gebremeskel, B., et al. (2019) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines7040155 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Opel, D. J., Taylor, J. A., Zhou, C., Catz, S., Myaing, M., & Mangione-Smith, R.
- Venue
- JAMA Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2013-11-01
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1065
- ISSN
- 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-6203
- OpenAlex
- W2062967862
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 10.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationship Between Parent Attitudes About Childhood Vaccines Survey Scores and Future Child Immunization Status: A Validation Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2483
- The paper
- Opel, D. J., Taylor, J. A., Zhou, C., Catz, S., Myaing, M., & Mangione-Smith, R. (2013). The Relationship Between Parent Attitudes About Childhood Vaccines Survey Scores and Future Child Immunization Status: A Validation Study. JAMA Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2483
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.