Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of Exome Sequencing for Infants in Intensive Care Units: Ascertainment of Severe Single-Gene Disorders and Effect on Medical Management

Open access
Meng, Linyan, Pammi, Mohan, Saronwala, Anirudh, Magoulas, Pilar, Ghazi, Andrew Ray, Vetrini, Francesco, Zhang, Jing, He, Weimin, Dharmadhikari, Avinash V., Qu, Chunjing, Ward, Patricia, Braxton, Alicia, Narayanan, Swetha, Ge, Xiaoyan, Tokita, Mari J., Santiago-Sim, Teresa, Dai, Hongzheng, Chiang, Theodore, Smith, Hadley, Azamian, Mahshid S., Robak, Laurie, Bostwick, Bret L., Schaaf, Christian P., Potocki, Lorraine, Scaglia, Fernando, Bacino, Carlos A., Hanchard, Neil A., Wangler, Michael F., Scott, Daryl, Brown, Chester, Hu, Jianhong, Belmont, John W., Burrage, Lindsay C., Graham, Brett H., Sutton, Vernon Reid, Craigen, William J., Plon, Sharon E., Lupski, James R., Beaudet, Arthur L., Gibbs, Richard A., Muzny, Donna M., Miller, Marcus J., Wang, Xia, Leduc, Magalie S., Xiao, Rui, Liu, Pengfei, Shaw, Chad, Walkiewicz, Magdalena, Bi, Weimin, Xia, Fan, Lee, Brendan, Eng, Christine M., Yang, Yaping, Lalani, Seema R.·2017·JAMA Pediatrics

Abstract

Importance: While congenital malformations and genetic diseases are a leading cause of early infant death, to our knowledge, the contribution of single-gene disorders in this group is undetermined. Objective: To determine the diagnostic yield and use of clinical exome sequencing in critically ill infants. Design, Setting, and Participants: Clinical exome sequencing was performed for 278 unrelated infants within the first 100 days of life who were admitted to Texas Children's Hospital in Houston, Texas, during a 5-year period between December 2011 and January 2017. Exome sequencing types included proband exome, trio exome, and critical trio exome, a rapid genomic assay for seriously ill infants. Main Outcomes and Measures: Indications for testing, diagnostic yield of clinical exome sequencing, turnaround time, molecular findings, patient age at diagnosis, and effect on medical management among a group of critically ill infants who were suspected to have genetic disorders. Results: The mean (SEM) age for infants participating in the study was 28.5 (1.7) days; of these, the mean (SEM) age was 29.0 (2.2) days for infants undergoing proband exome sequencing, 31.5 (3.9) days for trio exome, and 22.7 (3.9) days for critical trio exome. Clinical indications for exome sequencing included a range of medical concerns. Overall, a molecular diagnosis was achieved in 102 infants (36.7%) by clinical exome sequencing, with relatively low yield for cardiovascular abnormalities. The diagnosis affected medical management for 53 infants (52.0%) and had a substantial effect on informed redirection of care, initiation of new subspecialist care, medication/dietary modifications, and furthering life-saving procedures in select patients. Critical trio exome sequencing revealed a molecular diagnosis in 32 of 63 infants (50.8%) at a mean (SEM) of 33.1 (5.6) days of life with a mean (SEM) turnaround time of 13.0 (0.4) days. Clinical care was altered by the diagnosis in 23 of 32 patients (71.9%). The diagnostic yield, patient age at diagnosis, and medical effect in the group that underwent critical trio exome sequencing were significantly different compared with the group who underwent regular exome testing. For deceased infants (n = 81), genetic disorders were molecularly diagnosed in 39 (48.1%) by exome sequencing, with implications for recurrence risk counseling. Conclusions and Relevance: Exome sequencing is a powerful tool for the diagnostic evaluation of critically ill infants with suspected monogenic disorders in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care units and its use has a notable effect on clinical decision making.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3438

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Meng, L., Pammi, M., Saronwala, A., Magoulas, P., Ghazi, A. R., Vetrini, F., Zhang, J., He, W., Dharmadhikari, A. V., Qu, C., Ward, P., Braxton, A., Narayanan, S., Ge, X., Tokita, M. J., Santiago-Sim, T., Dai, H., Chiang, T., Smith, H., Azamian, M. S., Robak, L., Bostwick, B. L., Schaaf, C. P., Potocki, L., Scaglia, F., Bacino, C. A., Hanchard, N. A., Wangler, M. F., Scott, D., Brown, C., Hu, J., Belmont, J. W., Burrage, L. C., Graham, B. H., Sutton, V. R., Craigen, W. J., Plon, S. E., Lupski, J. R., Beaudet, A. L., Gibbs, R. A., Muzny, D. M., Miller, M. J., Wang, X., Leduc, M. S., Xiao, R., Liu, P., Shaw, C., Walkiewicz, M., Bi, W., Xia, F., Lee, B., Eng, C. M., Yang, Y., & Lalani, S. R.
Venue
JAMA Pediatrics
Published
2017-12-04
Volume
171
Issue
12
Pages
e173438
ISSN
  • 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6203
OpenAlex
W2762508685
Cited by
431
References
2
FWCI
27.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Exome Sequencing for Infants in Intensive Care Units: Ascertainment of Severe Single-Gene Disorders and Effect on Medical Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3438
The paper
Meng, L., Pammi, M., Saronwala, A., Magoulas, P., Ghazi, A. R., Vetrini, F., Zhang, J., He, W., Dharmadhikari, A. V., Qu, C., Ward, P., Braxton, A., Narayanan, S., Ge, X., Tokita, M. J., Santiago-Sim, T., Dai, H., Chiang, T., Smith, H., . . . Lalani, S. R. (2017). Use of Exome Sequencing for Infants in Intensive Care Units: Ascertainment of Severe Single-Gene Disorders and Effect on Medical Management. JAMA Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3438

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.