Attitudes and Psychological Factors Associated With News Monitoring, Social Distancing, Disinfecting, and Hoarding Behaviors Among US Adolescents During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic
Open accessAbstract
Importance: As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spreads across the world, it is critical to understand the psychological factors associated with pandemic-related behaviors. This perspecitve may be especially important to study among adolescents, who are less likely to experience severe symptoms but contribute to the spread of the virus. Objective: To examine psychological factors associated with adolescents' behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: This self-reported survey conducted from March 20 to 22, 2020, recruited a population-based sample of adolescents via social media to complete an anonymous survey. Participants were eligible if they had internet access, lived in the United States, and were aged 13 to 18 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included COVID-19 news monitoring, social distancing, disinfecting, and hoarding behaviors during the 7 days after the United States declared a national emergency. The psychological factors were attitudes about COVID-19 severity, social responsibility values, social trust, and self-interest. The a priori hypotheses were that greater attitudes about the severity of COVID-19, greater social responsibility, and greater social trust would be associated with greater news monitoring, social distancing, and disinfecting, whereas greater self-interest would be associated with more hoarding. Results: The sample included 770 adolescents collected via convenience sampling (mean [SD] age, 16.3 [1.1] years; 575 girls [74.7%]). Many teens reported not engaging in pure social distancing (528 [68.6%]), but they were monitoring the news (688 [89.4%]) and disinfecting daily (676 [87.8%]). Some teens reported hoarding (152 [19.7%]). Attitudes about the greater severity of COVID-19 were associated with more social distancing (β = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.25), disinfecting (β = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.23), and news monitoring (β = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.33) but also more hoarding (β = 0.08; 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.16). Greater social responsibility was associated with more disinfecting (β = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.32) and news monitoring (β = 0.14; 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.22) and less hoarding (β = -0.07; 95% CI = -0.14 to -0.01). Greater self-interest values were associated with less social distancing (β = -0.08; 95% CI = -0.15 to -0.01) and more hoarding (β = 0.08; 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.15). Greater social trust was associated with less hoarding (β = -0.09; 95% CI, -0.16 to -0.02). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this survey study suggest that emphasizing the severity of COVID-19 and the social implications of pandemic-related behaviors may be important for teens, particularly for those who are not following preventive health behaviors or who are engaging in hoarding.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Greater perception of the risk and severity of COVID-19, greater news monitoring, and perceived scarcity were associated with more panic buying in recent surveys.
“recent surveys assessing individuals from the US, China, India, and Pakistan found that greater perception of the risk and severity of COVID-19, greater news monitoring, and perceived scarcity were associated with more panic buying (Clemens et al., 2020; Islam et al., 2020; Oosterhoff and Palmer, 2020; Zhang and Zhou, 2021).”
From Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19 (2021) · cites this paper as Oosterhoff and Palmer, 2020
The Results (page not available in our copy) associate greater perceived COVID-19 severity with more hoarding among US adolescents. The paper measures news monitoring separately but does not report that greater news monitoring predicts hoarding; it also does not report perceived scarcity as a predictor. Its findings therefore support only part of the multi-study claim attributed to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPanic buying during COVID-19 was related to greater self-interested values and feeling less responsible for others.
“Oosterhoff and Palmer (2020) found evidence that panic buying during COVID-19 was related to greater self-interested values and feeling less responsible for others.”
From Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19 (2021) · cites this paper as Oosterhoff and Palmer, 2020
The Results report that greater self-interest values were associated with more hoarding, while greater social responsibility values were associated with less hoarding. The study measured self-reported hoarding among US adolescents, however, so it does not establish the relationship for panic buying across the broader population. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOosterhoff and Palmer (2020) observed a trivial effect size between selfishness and panic buying (r = .09) using a non-validated measure of selfishness.
“Using a non-validated measure of selfishness, Oosterhoff and Palmer (2020) observed a trivial effect size between selfishness and panic buying ( r = .09)”
From Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19 (2021) · cites this paper as Oosterhoff and Palmer, 2020
The correlation table (labeled Conclusions; page unavailable) reports r = 0.09 between self-interest and hoarding, supporting the small association described as selfishness and panic buying. However, the Measures section says the community-attachment questions were taken from previously validated measures, so the claim that the self-interest measure was non-validated is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe study did not replicate previous research which found that selfishness was related to panic buying.
“We also did not replicate previous research which found that selfishness was related to panic buying (Oosterhoff and Palmer, 2020).”
From Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19 (2021) · cites this paper as Oosterhoff and Palmer, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Ursachi, G., Horodnic, I. A., & Zaiţ, A. (2015) · Procedia Economics and Finance · doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00123-9 · Cited by 1,466 · see citing works
Adolescent Development in Interpersonal and Societal Contexts
Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Metzger, A. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190124 · Cited by 1,264 · see citing works
Examining Trends in Adolescent Environmental Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors Across Three Decades
Wray‐Lake, L., Flanagan, C. A., & Osgood, D. W. (2009) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916509335163 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Developmental change in social responsibility during adolescence: An ecological perspective.
Wray‐Lake, L., Syvertsen, A. K., & Flanagan, C. A. (2015) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000067 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Metzger, A., Alvis, L. M., Oosterhoff, B. J., Babskie, E., Syvertsen, A. K., & Wray‐Lake, L. (2018) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-018-0842-5 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationWray‐Lake, L., Maggs, J. L., Johnston, L. D., Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2012) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.030 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Historical Trends in Concerns About Social Issues Across Four Decades Among U.S. Adolescents
Oosterhoff, B. J., Wray‐Lake, L., Palmer, C. A., & Kaplow, J. B. (2019) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12493 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19 among children in China. Pediatrics. Published online March 16, 2020. doi:10.1542/peds. 202q0-0702 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Functional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic
Harper, C. A., Satchell, L. P., Fido, D., & Latzman, R. D. (2021) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5 · Cited by 1,564 · see citing works
Adolescent psychiatric disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown
Guessoum, S. B., Lachal, J., Radjack, R., Carretier, E., Minassian, S., Benoit, L., & Moro, M. R. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113264 · Cited by 1,025 · see citing works
Oosterhoff, B., Palmer, C. A., Wilson, J., & Shook, N. (2020) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.004 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Self-citationJovančević, A., & Milićević, N. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110216 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
David, J., Visvalingam, S., & Norberg, M. M. (2021) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114062 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Espinoza, G., & Hernandez, H. L. (2022) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.2305 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Palmer, C. A., Oosterhoff, B., Massey, A., & Bawden, H. (2022) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.01.127 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Oosterhoff, B., & Palmer, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Montana State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Oosterhoff, Benjamin
- Venue
- JAMA Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2020-12-01
- Volume
- 174
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1184
- ISSN
- 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-6203
- PMC
- PMC7325067
- OpenAlex
- W3037625412
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 32
- FWCI
- 18.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM104417)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, adolescents, news monitoring, social distancing, hoarding behavior, social responsibility, social trust, self-interest, psychological factors, social media recruitment
- MeSH terms
- Hoarding Disorder, Physical Distancing, COVID-19, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Isolation, United States, Health Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review