The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical Representation of Afferent Bodily Signals in Borderline Personality Disorder: Neural Correlates and Relationship to Emotional Dysregulation
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: The ability to perceive and regulate one's own emotions has been tightly linked to the processing of afferent bodily signals (interoception). Thus, disturbed interoception might contribute to the core feature of emotional dysregulation in borderline personality disorder (BPD), as increased levels of depersonalization, body image disturbances, and reduced sensitivity to physical pain suggest poor body awareness in BPD. OBJECTIVE: To determine neural correlates of disturbed body awareness in BPD and its associations with emotional dysregulation and to explore improvements in body awareness with BPD symptom remission. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Case-control study performed at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Heartbeat evoked potentials (HEPs), an indicator of the cortical representation of afferent signals from the cardiovascular system, were investigated in 34 medication-free patients with BPD, 31 healthy volunteers, and 17 medication-free patients with BPD in remission. The HEPs were assessed using 5-minute resting-state electroencephalograms and parallel electrocardiograms. Core BPD symptoms, history of childhood traumatization, and psychiatric disorders were assessed by means of self-reports and structured interviews. To measure neural correlates of disturbed body awareness, high-resolution T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging scans were collected and analyzed using voxel-based morphometry and region-of-interest-based approaches. The study was performed between 2012 and 2014, and data analysis was performed in 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mean HEP amplitudes in resting-state electroencephalograms and their correlation with self-reported emotional dysregulation, as well as with gray matter volume. RESULTS: Patients with BPD had significantly reduced mean HEP amplitudes compared with healthy volunteers (F1,61 = 11.32, P = .001), whereas the mean HEP amplitudes of patients with BDP in remission lie somewhere in between these 2 groups of participants (P > .05). The HEP amplitudes were negatively correlated with emotional dysregulation (R = -0.30, P = .01) and positively associated with gray matter volume in the left anterior insula (R = 0.53, P < .05) and the bilateral dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (R = 0.47, P < .05), 2 structures that have been identified as core regions for interoception. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results indicate state-dependent deficits in the cortical processing of bodily signals in patients with BPD, which appear to be associated with core features of BPD. The analysis of patients with BPD in remission suggests an improvement in cortical representation of bodily signals with symptom remission. Results recommend the integration of techniques to strengthen bodily awareness in psychotherapeutic interventions of BPD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For instance, reduced amplitudes of heart evoked potential (HEP), an indicator of cortical processing of afferent bodily signals, were revealed in patients with bipolar personality disorder [50], while a reduced IAc was reported in anorexia nervosa patients [52].”
From Interoceptive Ability and Emotion Regulation in Mind–Body Interventions: An Integrative Review (2024) · cites this paper as [50]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1023/b:joba.0000007455.08539.94 · Cited by 8,942
(2008) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,477
(1993) · Cited by 7,136
How do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness
(Bud) Craig, A. D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2555 · Cited by 6,657
Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0046234 · Cited by 6,223
How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body
Craig, A. D. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn894 · Cited by 6,006
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9 · Cited by 5,055
Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness
Critchley, H. D., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Öhman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1176 · Cited by 3,406
Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1976) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986001001069 · Cited by 1,701
Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: Mentalization-based treatment
Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2004) · doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780198527664.001.0001 · Cited by 1,460
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [54]54. Fewtrell WD. Fewtrell Depersonalisation Scale (FDS). Leicester, England: APT Press; 2000.
- [62]62. Schulz A, Köster S, Beutel ME, et al. Altered patterns of heartbeat-evoked potentials in depersonalization/derealization disorder: neurophysiological evidence for impaired cortical representation of bodily signals. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(5):506-516.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Critchley, H. D., & Garfinkel, S. N. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.020 · Cited by 899
Borderline personality disorder
Gunderson, J. G., Herpertz, S. C., Skodol, A. E., Torgersen, S. O., & Zanarini, M. C. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2018.29 · Cited by 511
Self-citationTowards a comprehensive assessment of interoception in a multi-dimensional framework
Suksasilp, C., & Garfinkel, S. N. (2022) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108262 · Cited by 288
“…systole, electrocutaneous shocks produce reduced pain sensation (Wilkinson et al., 2013), loud auditory stimuli produce smaller startle responses (Müller et al., 2015; Schulz, Schilling, V ¨ ogele, & Sch ¨ achinger, 2019), and word stimuli are less well remembered relative to when presented at…”
Park, H.-D., & Blanke, O. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.081 · Cited by 285
“Patients with a borderline personality disorder, which commonly share overlapped symptomatology with depersonalization patients (Hedrick and Berlin, 2012), showed more positive HEP amplitude over central regions in the 400 to 600 ms post Rpeak time window during the resting state condition, compared to healthy control…”
InfluentialColl, M.-P., Hobson, H., Bird, G., & Murphy, J. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.012 · Cited by 262
“…Luft Bhattacharya,397 2015; Lutz et al., 2019; MacKinnon et al., 2013; Mai et al., 2018; Marshall et al., 2017, 2018,398 2019; Montoya et al., 1993; Müller et al., 2015; Pang et al., 2019; Park et al., 2016; Per-399 ogamvros et al., 2019; Petzschner et al., 2019; Pollatos et al., 2005, 2016;…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Müller, L. E., Schulz, A., Andermann, M., Gäbel, A., Gescher, D. M., Spohn, A., Herpertz, S. C., & Bertsch, K.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- University of Luxembourg (LU)
- Corresponding author
- Bertsch, Katja
- Venue
- JAMA Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2015-11-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1077
- ISSN
- 2168-622X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096930850
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Keywords
- borderline personality disorder, interoception, body awareness, emotional dysregulation, heartbeat-evoked potentials, heart rate variability, anterior insula, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, gray matter volume, symptom remission, childhood trauma, resting-state EEG, body image disturbance, depersonalization, pain sensitivity, emotion regulation, neuroplasticity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Afferent Pathways, Borderline Personality Disorder, Cerebral Cortex, Electrocardiography, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Evoked Potentials, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult, Interoception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review