Cited by 285Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Heartbeat-evoked cortical responses: Underlying mechanisms, functional roles, and methodological considerations

Open access
Park, Hyeong-Dong, Blanke, Olaf·2019·NeuroImage

Abstract

The heart continuously and cyclically communicates with the brain. Beyond homeostatic regulation and sensing, recent neuroscience research has started to shed light on brain-heart interactions in diverse cognitive and emotional processes. In particular, neural responses to heartbeats, as measured with the so-called heartbeat-evoked potential, have been shown to be useful for investigating cortical activity processing cardiac signals. In this review, we first overview and discuss the basic properties of the HEP such as underlying physiological pathways, brain regions, and neural mechanisms. We then provide a systematic review of the mental processes associated with cortical HEP activations, notably heartbeat perception, emotional feelings, perceptual awareness, and self-consciousness, in healthy subjects and clinical populations. Finally, we discuss methodological issues regarding the experimental design and data analysis for separating genuine HEP components from physiological artifacts (e.g., cardiac field artifact, pulse artifact) or other neural activities that are not specifically associated with the heartbeat. Findings from this review suggest that when intrinsic limitations (e.g., artifacts) are carefully controlled, the HEP could provide a reliable neural measure for investigating brain-viscera interactions in diverse mental processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.081

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiac parameters themselves such as heart rate or stroke volume seem to have only a limited influence on HERs' variability.

    “So far, cardiac parameters themselves such as heart rate or stroke volume seem to have only a limited influence on HERs' variability 79-81 .”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [79]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, H.-D., & Blanke, O.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Park, Hyeong-Dong
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
197
Pages
502-511
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943182254
Cited by
285
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
13.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (320030_182497)
  • Fondation Bertarelli
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
heartbeat-evoked potentials, heart-brain interaction, cardiac signals, heartbeat perception, feelings, perceptual awareness, self-consciousness
MeSH terms
Brain, Heart, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review