CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 363Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologySuicide and Self-Harm StudiesReligion and Society Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association Between Religious Service Attendance and Lower Suicide Rates Among US Women

Open access
VanderWeele, Tyler J., Li, Shanshan, Tsai, Alexander C., Kawachi, Ichiro·2016·JAMA Psychiatry
DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1243PMC PMC7228478
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Previous studies have linked suicide risk with religious participation, but the majority have used ecologic, cross-sectional, or case-control data. OBJECTIVE: To examine the longitudinal association between religious service attendance and suicide and the joint associations of suicide with service attendance and religious affiliation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We evaluated associations between religious service attendance and suicide from 1996 through June 2010 in a large, long-term prospective cohort, the Nurses' Health Study, in an analysis that included 89 708 women. Religious service attendance was self-reported in 1992 and 1996. Data analysis was conducted from 1996 through 2010. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine the association between religious service attendance and suicide, adjusting for demographic covariates, lifestyle factors, medical history, depressive symptoms, and social integration measures. We performed sensitivity analyses to examine the influence of unmeasured confounding. RESULTS: Among 89 708 women aged 30 to 55 years who participated in the Nurses' Health Study, attendance at religious services once per week or more was associated with an approximately 5-fold lower rate of suicide compared with never attending religious services (hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06-0.46). Service attendance once or more per week vs less frequent attendance was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.05 (95% CI, 0.006-0.48) for Catholics but only 0.34 (95% CI, 0.10-1.10) for Protestants (P = .05 for heterogeneity). Results were robust in sensitivity analysis and to exclusions of persons who were previously depressed or had a history of cancer or cardiovascular disease. There was evidence that social integration, depressive symptoms, and alcohol consumption partially mediated the association among those occasionally attending services, but not for those attending frequently. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort of US women, frequent religious service attendance was associated with a significantly lower rate of suicide.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1243

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]Durkheim E Suicide: a study in sociology. (1st Free Press paperback ed.) New York: Free Press 1966.
  2. [29]Church Catholic. Catechism of the Catholic Church. Libreria Editrice Vaticana Loyola University Press, Vatican City: Chicago, Ill. 2 Ed 2000.
  3. [30]Selvin HC. Durkheim’s Suicide: Further Thoughts on a Methodological Classic. Émile Durkheim, Greenwood Press, Westport, Conn 1965, pp 113– 136.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 363

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
VanderWeele, T. J., Li, S., Tsai, A. C., & Kawachi, I.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
VanderWeele, Tyler J.
ORCID
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2016-08-01
Volume
73
Issue
8
Pages
845
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1243
PMC
PMC7228478
OpenAlex
W2461556580
Cited by
363
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 8
FWCI
35.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (UM1CA186107)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religious service attendance, suicide, religious affiliation, women, Catholicism, Protestantism, social integration, depressive symptoms, alcohol consumption, suicide risk factors, Nurses' Health Study
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adult, Cause of Death, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Religion and Psychology, Risk, Sex Factors, Statistics as Topic, Suicide, United States, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review