Cited by 19Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPsychiatric care and mental health services

Better suicide screening and prevention are possible

Hogan, Michael F.·2016·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

This Viewpoint discusses the Zero Suicide care model, which incorporates current evidence-based measures for predicting and preventing suicide, and proposes additional actions needed to reduce the increasing rate of suicide in the United States.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2411

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hogan, M. F.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Hogan, Michael F.
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2016-11-01
Volume
73
Issue
11
Pages
1111
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2527763602
Cited by
19
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
suicide risk screening, suicide prevention, suicide risk prediction, suicide rates, mental health services
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Mental Disorders, Humans, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review