Cited by 120Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Evaluation of Drinking Risk Levels as Outcomes in Alcohol Pharmacotherapy Trials: A Secondary Analysis of 3 Randomized Clinical Trials

Open access
Falk, Daniel E., O’Malley, Stephanie S., Witkiewitz, Katie, Anton, Raymond F., Litten, Raye Z., Slater, Megan, Kranzler, Henry R., Mann, Karl F. +6 more·2019·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration recognizes total abstinence and no heavy drinking days as outcomes for pivotal pharmacotherapy trials for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Many patients have difficulty achieving these outcomes, which can discourage seeking treatment and has slowed the development of medications that affect alcohol use. Objective: To compare 2 drinking-reduction outcomes with total abstinence and no heavy drinking outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were obtained from 3 multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of medications for treating alcohol dependence (naltrexone, varenicline, and topiramate) in adults with DSM-IV-categorized alcohol dependence. Main Outcomes and Measures: Within each trial, the percentage of participants in active and placebo conditions who met responder definitions of abstinence, no heavy drinking days, a WHO 1-level reduction, and a WHO 2-level reduction was computed by month with corresponding effect sizes (Cohen h). Results: Across the 3 trials (N = 1169; mean [SD] age, 45 [10] years; 824 [70.5%] men), the percentage of participants classified as responders during the last 4 weeks of treatment was lowest for abstinence (naltrexone, 34.7% [100 of 288]; varenicline, 7.3% [7 of 96]; topiramate, 11.7% [21 of 179]) followed by no heavy drinking days (naltrexone, 51.0% [147 of 288]; varenicline, 24.0% [23 of 96]; topiramate, 20.7% [37 of 179]), WHO 2-level reduction (naltrexone, 75.0% [216 of 288]; varenicline, 55.2% [53 of 96]; topiramate, 44.7% [80 of 179]), and WHO 1-level reduction (naltrexone, 83.3% [240 of 288]; varenicline, 69.8 [67 of 96]; topiramate, 54.7% [98 of 179]) outcomes. Standardized treatment effects observed for the WHO 2-level reduction outcomes (naltrexone, Cohen h = 0.214 [95% CI, 0.053 -0.375]; varenicline, 0.273 [95% CI, -0.006 to 0.553]; topiramate, 0.230 [95% CI, 0.024-0.435]) and WHO 1-level reduction (naltrexone, Cohen h = 0.116 [95% CI, -0.046 to 0.277]; varenicline, 0.338 [95% CI, 0.058-0.617]; topiramate, 0.014 [95% CI, -0.192 to 0.219]) were comparable with those obtained using abstinence (naltrexone, Cohen h = 0.142 [95% CI, -0.020 to 0.303]; varenicline, 0.146 [95% CI, -0.133 to 0.426]; topiramate, 0.369 [95% CI, 0.163-0.574]) and no heavy drinking days (naltrexone, Cohen h = 0.140 [95% CI, -0.021 to 0.302]; varenicline, 0.232 [95% CI, -0.048 to 0.511]; topiramate, 0.207 [95% CI, 0.002-0.413]). Conclusions and Relevance: WHO drinking risk level reductions appear to be worthwhile indicators of treatment outcome in AUD pharmacotherapy trials. These outcomes may align with drinking reduction goals of many patients and capture clinically meaningful improvements experienced by more patients than either abstinence or no heavy drinking days. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00006206; NCT01146613; NCT00210925.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3079

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falk, D. E., O’Malley, S. S., Witkiewitz, K., Anton, R. F., Litten, R. Z., Slater, M., Kranzler, H. R., Mann, K. F., Hasin, D. S., Johnson, B., Meulien, D., Ryan, M., Fertig, J., & Workgroup, F. T. A. C. T. I. (.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • CSR, Incorporated
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Lundbeck (Denmark) (DK)
Corresponding author
Falk, Daniel E.
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
374
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921551456
Cited by
120
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
FWCI
12.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Indivior
  • Cerecor
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA025309, P50AA010761)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
alcoholism, alcohol pharmacotherapy, total abstinence, naltrexone, varenicline, topiramate, treatment response, outcome definitions, effect size, responder definition, relapse prevention, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Varenicline, Topiramate, Adult, Alcohol Deterrents, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Naltrexone, Risk Assessment, Alcohol Abstinence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review