Cited by 41Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseMental Health Treatment and Access

Clinical epidemiological research on suicide-related behaviors—where we are and where we need to go

Kessler, Ronald C.·2019·JAMA Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1238

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kessler, R. C.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kessler, Ronald C.
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
76
Issue
8
Pages
777
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951805042
Cited by
41
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
suicide-related behaviors, suicide risk, clinical epidemiology, suicide prevention, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Humans, Veterans, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review