Cited by 542Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareMachine Learning in Healthcare

Prediction Models for Suicide Attempts and Deaths: A Systematic Review and Simulation

Belsher, Bradley E., Smolenski, Derek J., Pruitt, Larry D., Bush, Nigel E., Beech, Erin H., Workman, Don E., Morgan, Rebecca L., Evatt, Daniel P. +2 more·2019·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

Importance: Suicide prediction models have the potential to improve the identification of patients at heightened suicide risk by using predictive algorithms on large-scale data sources. Suicide prediction models are being developed for use across enterprise-level health care systems including the US Department of Defense, US Department of Veterans Affairs, and Kaiser Permanente. Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of suicide prediction models in predicting suicide and suicide attempts and to simulate the effects of implementing suicide prediction models using population-level estimates of suicide rates. Evidence Review: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify research evaluating the predictive accuracy of suicide prediction models in identifying patients at high risk for a suicide attempt or death by suicide. Each database was searched from inception to August 21, 2018. The search strategy included search terms for suicidal behavior, risk prediction, and predictive modeling. Reference lists of included studies were also screened. Two reviewers independently screened and evaluated eligible studies. Findings: From a total of 7306 abstracts reviewed, 17 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 64 unique prediction models across 5 countries with more than 14 million participants. The research quality of the included studies was generally high. Global classification accuracy was good (≥0.80 in most models), while the predictive validity associated with a positive result for suicide mortality was extremely low (≤0.01 in most models). Simulations of the results suggest very low positive predictive values across a variety of population assessment characteristics. Conclusions and Relevance: To date, suicide prediction models produce accurate overall classification models, but their accuracy of predicting a future event is near 0. Several critical concerns remain unaddressed, precluding their readiness for clinical applications across health systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0174

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belsher, B. E., Smolenski, D. J., Pruitt, L. D., Bush, N. E., Beech, E. H., Workman, D. E., Morgan, R. L., Evatt, D. P., Tucker, J., & Skopp, N. A.
Affiliations
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
  • Defense Health Agency (US)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2019-06-01
Volume
76
Issue
6
Pages
642
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921616123
Cited by
540
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 81 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 31
FWCI
10.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
suicide attempts, suicide mortality, diagnostic accuracy, predictive validity, positive predictive value, risk prediction, clinical implementation, health care system
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review